These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7772206)

  • 1. Revised NIOSH equation for manual lifting: a method for job evaluation.
    Garg A
    AAOHN J; 1995 Apr; 43(4):211-6; quiz 217-8. PubMed ID: 7772206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An evaluation of methods assessing the physical demands of manual lifting in scaffolding.
    van der Beek AJ; Erik Mathiassen S; Windhorst J; Burdorf A
    Appl Ergon; 2005 Mar; 36(2):213-22. PubMed ID: 15694076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When is it safe to manually lift a patient?
    Waters TR
    Am J Nurs; 2007 Aug; 107(8):53-8; quiz 59. PubMed ID: 17667392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New procedure for assessing sequential manual lifting jobs using the revised NIOSH lifting equation.
    Waters TR; Lu ML; Occhipinti E
    Ergonomics; 2007 Nov; 50(11):1761-70. PubMed ID: 17972201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks.
    Waters TR; Putz-Anderson V; Garg A; Fine LJ
    Ergonomics; 1993 Jul; 36(7):749-76. PubMed ID: 8339717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The revised NIOSH lifting guidelines. Application in a hospital setting.
    Steinbrecher SM
    AAOHN J; 1994 Feb; 42(2):62-6. PubMed ID: 8147989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Usability of the revised NIOSH lifting equation.
    Dempsey PG
    Ergonomics; 2002 Oct; 45(12):817-28. PubMed ID: 12487684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of measurements for the revised NIOSH lifting equation. Applied Ergonomics 29(6) 433-438.
    Burdorf A; van der Beek A
    Appl Ergon; 1999 Aug; 30(4):369-71. PubMed ID: 10416850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Progress in research on evaluation method of lifting equation of National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health of USA].
    Cao L; He LH; Wang S
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2010 Dec; 28(12):936-9. PubMed ID: 21241613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A cross-validation of the NIOSH limits for manual lifting.
    Hidalgo J; Genaidy A; Karwowski W; Christensen D; Huston R; Stambough J
    Ergonomics; 1995 Dec; 38(12):2455-64. PubMed ID: 8586075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of asymmetry on psychophysical lifting capacity for three lifting types.
    Han B; Stobbe TJ; Hobbs GR
    Ergonomics; 2005 Mar; 48(4):364-79. PubMed ID: 15804846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comprehensive lifting model: beyond the NIOSH lifting equation.
    Hidalgo J; Genaidy A; Karwowski W; Christensen D; Huston R; Stambough J
    Ergonomics; 1997 Sep; 40(9):916-27. PubMed ID: 9306742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ergonomics evaluation of zinc pot skimming.
    Habes DJ
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2001 Apr; 16(4):419-25. PubMed ID: 11318382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effectiveness of commonly used lifting assessment methods to identify industrial jobs associated with elevated risk of low-back disorders.
    Marras WS; Fine LJ; Ferguson SA; Waters TR
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):229-45. PubMed ID: 9973881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnosis: work pain. Prescription: practical job redesign.
    McCormack J
    Mater Manag Health Care; 1994 Dec; 3(12):22-6. PubMed ID: 10139116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Back to basics.
    Geyer S
    Mater Manag Health Care; 2003 Dec; 12(12):24-6. PubMed ID: 14710675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relationship between low back discomfort ratings and the NIOSH lifting index.
    Wang MJ; Garg A; Chang YC; Shih YC; Yeh WY; Lee CL
    Hum Factors; 1998 Sep; 40(3):509-15. PubMed ID: 9849108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methods for assessing the physical demands of manual lifting: a review and case study from warehousing.
    Waters TR; Putz-Anderson V; Baron S
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 Dec; 59(12):871-81. PubMed ID: 9866167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preventing musculoskeletal injuries in nurses: directions for future research.
    Nelson A; Gross C; Lloyd J
    SCI Nurs; 1997 Jun; 14(2):45-51. PubMed ID: 9295751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An evaluation of the NIOSH Lifting Equation: a psychophysical and biomechanical investigation.
    Elfeituri FE; Taboun SM
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2002; 8(2):243-58. PubMed ID: 12067513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.