150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7772476)
1. Electrical impedance measured to five skin depths in mild irritant dermatitis induced by sodium lauryl sulphate.
Nicander I; Ollmar S; Rozell BL; Eek A; Emtestam L
Br J Dermatol; 1995 May; 132(5):718-24. PubMed ID: 7772476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electrical impedance index in human skin: measurements after occlusion, in 5 anatomical regions and in mild irritant contact dermatitis.
Emtestam L; Ollmar S
Contact Dermatitis; 1993 Feb; 28(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 8458202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electrical impedance compared with other non-invasive bioengineering techniques and visual scoring for detection of irritation in human skin.
Ollmar S; Nyrén M; Nicander I; Emtestam L
Br J Dermatol; 1994 Jan; 130(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 8305313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electrical impedance applied to non-invasive detection of irritation in skin.
Ollmar S; Emtestam L
Contact Dermatitis; 1992 Jul; 27(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 1424589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Instrumental measurement of the Mantoux test: differential effects of tuberculin and sodium lauryl sulphate on impedance response patterns in human skin.
Nyrén M; Hagströmer L; Emtestam L
Dermatology; 2000; 201(3):212-7. PubMed ID: 11096191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Basal electrical impedance in relation to sodium lauryl sulphate-induced skin reactions--a comparison of patients with eczema and healthy controls.
Kuzmina N; Hagströmer L; Nyrén M; Emtestam L
Skin Res Technol; 2003 Nov; 9(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 14641887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mild and below threshold skin responses to sodium lauryl sulphate assessed by depth controlled electrical impedance.
Nicander I; Ollmar S
Skin Res Technol; 1997 Nov; 3(4):259-63. PubMed ID: 27333586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Increased stratum corneum turnover induced by subclinical irritant dermatitis.
Wilhelm KP; Saunders JC; Maibach HI
Br J Dermatol; 1990 Jun; 122(6):793-8. PubMed ID: 2369560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation of impedance response patterns to histological findings in irritant skin reactions induced by various surfactants.
Nicander I; Ollmar S; Eek A; Lundh Rozell B; Emtestam L
Br J Dermatol; 1996 Feb; 134(2):221-8. PubMed ID: 8746333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Artificial disruption of skin barrier prior to irritant patch testing does not improve test design.
Gebhard KL; Effendy I; Löffler H
Br J Dermatol; 2004 Jan; 150(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 14746620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measurement of oedema in irritant-exposed skin by a dielectric technique.
Miettinen M; Mönkkönen J; Lahtinen MR; Nuutinen J; Lahtinen T
Skin Res Technol; 2006 Nov; 12(4):235-40. PubMed ID: 17026653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Basal transepidermal water loss, skin thickness, skin blood flow and skin colour in relation to sodium-lauryl-sulphate-induced irritation in normal skin.
Agner T
Contact Dermatitis; 1991 Aug; 25(2):108-14. PubMed ID: 1935039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electrical impedance as a potential tool to distinguish between allergic and irritant contact dermatitis.
Nyrén M; Kuzmina N; Emtestam L
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2003 Mar; 48(3):394-400. PubMed ID: 12637919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acute irritant contact dermatitis: recovery time in man.
Lee JY; Effendy I; Maibach HI
Contact Dermatitis; 1997 Jun; 36(6):285-90. PubMed ID: 9237006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Different skin irritation abilities of different qualities of sodium lauryl sulphate.
Agner T; Serup J; Handlos V; Batsberg W
Contact Dermatitis; 1989 Sep; 21(3):184-8. PubMed ID: 2791543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electrical impedance model for evaluation of skin irritation in rabbits and humans.
Ferreira DM; Silva CS; Souza MN
Skin Res Technol; 2007 Aug; 13(3):259-67. PubMed ID: 17610647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of surfactant mixtures on irritant contact dermatitis potential in man: sodium lauroyl glutamate and sodium lauryl sulphate.
Lee CH; Kawasaki Y; Maibach HI
Contact Dermatitis; 1994 Apr; 30(4):205-9. PubMed ID: 8033544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Potential for irritation increases from the wrist to the cubital fossa.
Van der Valk PG; Maibach HI
Br J Dermatol; 1989 Dec; 121(6):709-12. PubMed ID: 2611122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The ability of betaine to reduce the irritating effects of detergents assessed visually, histologically and by bioengineering methods.
Nicander I; Rantanen I; Rozell BL; Söderling E; Ollmar S
Skin Res Technol; 2003 Feb; 9(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 12535285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Skin irritant reactivity following experimental cumulative irritant contact dermatitis.
Widmer J; Elsner P; Burg G
Contact Dermatitis; 1994 Jan; 30(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 8156760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
