153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7774766)
1. The mismatch negativity in cochlear implant users.
Ponton CW; Don M
Ear Hear; 1995 Feb; 16(1):131-46. PubMed ID: 7774766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mismatch negativity (MMN) objectively reflects timbre discrimination thresholds in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
Rahne T; Plontke SK; Wagner L
Brain Res; 2014 Oct; 1586():143-51. PubMed ID: 25152464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cortical encoding of timbre changes in cochlear implant users.
Zhang F; Benson C; Cahn SJ
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jan; 24(1):46-58. PubMed ID: 23231816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The mismatch negativity cortical evoked potential elicited by speech in cochlear-implant users.
Kraus N; Micco AG; Koch DB; McGee T; Carrell T; Sharma A; Wiet RJ; Weingarten CZ
Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):118-24. PubMed ID: 8458744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Neurophysiologic bases of speech discrimination.
Kraus N; McGee T; Carrell TD; Sharma A
Ear Hear; 1995 Feb; 16(1):19-37. PubMed ID: 7774767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cortical auditory evoked potentials in cochlear implant listeners via single electrode stimulation in relation to speech perception.
Liebscher T; Alberter K; Hoppe U
Int J Audiol; 2018 Dec; 57(12):933-940. PubMed ID: 30295156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The MMN as a viable and objective marker of auditory development in CI users.
Näätänen R; Petersen B; Torppa R; Lonka E; Vuust P
Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():57-75. PubMed ID: 28800468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using Neural Response Telemetry to Monitor Physiological Responses to Acoustic Stimulation in Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.
Abbas PJ; Tejani VD; Scheperle RA; Brown CJ
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):409-425. PubMed ID: 28085738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Maturation of the mismatch negativity: effects of profound deafness and cochlear implant use.
Ponton CW; Eggermont JJ; Don M; Waring MD; Kwong B; Cunningham J; Trautwein P
Audiol Neurootol; 2000; 5(3-4):167-85. PubMed ID: 10859411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Acoustic Cue Weighting by Adults with Cochlear Implants: A Mismatch Negativity Study.
Moberly AC; Bhat J; Shahin AJ
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):465-72. PubMed ID: 26655914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An objective auditory measure to assess speech recognition in adult cochlear implant users.
Turgeon C; Lazzouni L; Lepore F; Ellemberg D
Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Apr; 125(4):827-835. PubMed ID: 24209981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-assisted reading intervention for children with hearing impairment using cochlear implants: Effects on auditory event-related potentials and mismatch negativity.
Engström E; Kallioinen P; Lindgren M; Nakeva von Mentzer C; Sahlén B; Lyxell B; Uhlén I
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Oct; 137():110229. PubMed ID: 32896345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pure-Tone Masking Patterns for Monopolar and Phantom Electrical Stimulation in Cochlear Implants.
Saoji AA; Koka K; Litvak LM; Finley CC
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):124-130. PubMed ID: 28700446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electrically evoked mismatch negativity responses to loudness and pitch cues in cochlear implant users.
Wagner L; Ladek AS; Plontke SK; Rahne T
Sci Rep; 2023 Feb; 13(1):2413. PubMed ID: 36765122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mismatch negativity: a tool for the assessment of stimuli discrimination in cochlear implant subjects.
Wable J; van den Abbeele T; Gallégo S; Frachet B
Clin Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 111(4):743-51. PubMed ID: 10727926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Auditory mismatch negativity in cochlear implant users: a window to spectral discrimination.
Lopez-Valdes A; Mc Laughlin M; Viani L; Walshe P; Smith J; Zeng FG; Reilly RB
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():3555-8. PubMed ID: 24110497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Simultaneous masking between electric and acoustic stimulation in cochlear implant users with residual low-frequency hearing.
Krüger B; Büchner A; Nogueira W
Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():185-196. PubMed ID: 28688755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Saliency of Vowel Features in Neural Responses of Cochlear Implant Users.
Prévost F; Lehmann A
Clin EEG Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 49(6):388-397. PubMed ID: 29690785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An overview of cochlear implant electrode array designs.
Dhanasingh A; Jolly C
Hear Res; 2017 Dec; 356():93-103. PubMed ID: 29102129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. New parallel stimulation strategies revisited: effect of synchronous multi electrode stimulation on rate discrimination in cochlear implant users.
Bahmer A; Baumann U
Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Jun; 14(3):142-9. PubMed ID: 22733121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
