153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7774766)
21. On the clinical relevance of mismatch negativity: results from subjects with normal hearing and cochlear implant users.
Groenen P; Snik A; van den Broek P
Audiol Neurootol; 1996; 1(2):112-24. PubMed ID: 9390795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Place dependent stimulation rates improve pitch perception in cochlear implantees with single-sided deafness.
Rader T; Döge J; Adel Y; Weissgerber T; Baumann U
Hear Res; 2016 Sep; 339():94-103. PubMed ID: 27374479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Adult Cochlear Implant Users Are Able to Discriminate Basic Tonal Features in Musical Patterns: Evidence From Event-related Potentials.
Hahne A; Mainka A; Leuner A; Mürbe D
Otol Neurotol; 2016 Oct; 37(9):e360-8. PubMed ID: 27631660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Processing of interaural time differences in normal-hearing subjects and cochlear implant users with FSP and HDCIS coding strategy].
Heidekrüger N; Rahne T; Wagner L
HNO; 2019 Nov; 67(11):855-862. PubMed ID: 31201511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Auditory steady-state responses in cochlear implant users: Effect of modulation frequency and stimulation artifacts.
Gransier R; Deprez H; Hofmann M; Moonen M; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():149-160. PubMed ID: 26994660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Using a multi-feature paradigm to measure mismatch responses to minimal sound contrasts in children with cochlear implants and hearing aids.
Uhlén I; Engström E; Kallioinen P; Nakeva von Mentzer C; Lyxell B; Sahlén B; Lindgren M; Ors M
Scand J Psychol; 2017 Oct; 58(5):409-421. PubMed ID: 28901574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Electrophysiological Evidence of the Basilar-Membrane Travelling Wave and Frequency Place Coding of Sound in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Campbell L; Bester C; Iseli C; Sly D; Dragovic A; Gummer AW; O'Leary S
Audiol Neurootol; 2017; 22(3):180-189. PubMed ID: 29084395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Relationship between auditory perception skills and mismatch negativity recorded in free field in cochlear-implant users.
Roman S; Canévet G; Marquis P; Triglia JM; Liégeois-Chauvel C
Hear Res; 2005 Mar; 201(1-2):10-20. PubMed ID: 15721556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Delayed changes in auditory status in cochlear implant users with preserved acoustic hearing.
Scheperle RA; Tejani VD; Omtvedt JK; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Hansen MR; Gantz BJ; Oleson JJ; Ozanne MV
Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():45-57. PubMed ID: 28432874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Psychophysical measures from electrical stimulation of the human cochlear nucleus.
Shannon RV; Otto SR
Hear Res; 1990 Aug; 47(1-2):159-68. PubMed ID: 2228792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Recorded From Nucleus Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.
Brown CJ; Jeon EK; Chiou LK; Kirby B; Karsten SA; Turner CW; Abbas PJ
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):723-32. PubMed ID: 26295607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A preliminary study to identify a neurophysiological correlate of electroacoustic pitch matching in cochlear implant users.
Chin-Tuan Tan
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2017 Jul; 2017():1162-1165. PubMed ID: 29060081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Residual neural processing of musical sound features in adult cochlear implant users.
Timm L; Vuust P; Brattico E; Agrawal D; Debener S; Büchner A; Dengler R; Wittfoth M
Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():181. PubMed ID: 24772074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
Kelly AS; Purdy SC; Thorne PR
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Auditory Performance and Electrical Stimulation Measures in Cochlear Implant Recipients With Auditory Neuropathy Compared With Severe to Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
Attias J; Greenstein T; Peled M; Ulanovski D; Wohlgelernter J; Raveh E
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):184-193. PubMed ID: 28225734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
Xu J; Shepherd RK; Millard RE; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Detection of gaps in sinusoids and pulse trains by patients with cochlear implants.
Shannon RV
J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jun; 85(6):2587-92. PubMed ID: 2745882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Electrically evoked compound action potentials are different depending on the site of cochlear stimulation.
van de Heyning P; Arauz SL; Atlas M; Baumgartner WD; Caversaccio M; Chester-Browne R; Estienne P; Gavilan J; Godey B; Gstöttner W; Han D; Hagen R; Kompis M; Kuzovkov V; Lassaletta L; Lefevre F; Li Y; Müller J; Parnes L; Kleine Punte A; Raine C; Rajan G; Rivas A; Rivas JA; Royle N; Sprinzl G; Stephan K; Walkowiak A; Yanov Y; Zimmermann K; Zorowka P; Skarzynski H
Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Nov; 17(6):251-262. PubMed ID: 27900916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Auditory event-related potentials and mismatch negativity in children with hearing loss using hearing aids or cochlear implants - A three-year follow-up study.
Engström E; Kallioinen P; Nakeva von Mentzer C; Lindgren M; Sahlén B; Lyxell B; Ors M; Uhlén I
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Jan; 140():110519. PubMed ID: 33268013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Central auditory development after long-term cochlear implant use.
Jiwani S; Papsin BC; Gordon KA
Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 Sep; 124(9):1868-80. PubMed ID: 23680008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
