These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7774766)

  • 41. Speech-evoked cognitive P300 potentials in cochlear implant recipients.
    Micco AG; Kraus N; Koch DB; McGee TJ; Carrell TD; Sharma A; Nicol T; Wiet RJ
    Am J Otol; 1995 Jul; 16(4):514-20. PubMed ID: 8588653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Objective assessment of electrode discrimination with the auditory change complex in adult cochlear implant users.
    Mathew R; Undurraga J; Li G; Meerton L; Boyle P; Shaida A; Selvadurai D; Jiang D; Vickers D
    Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():86-101. PubMed ID: 28826636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Visualization of stimulation patterns in cochlear implants: application to event-related potentials (P300) in cochlear implant users.
    Mühler R; Ziese M; Kevanishvili Z; Schmidt M; von Specht H
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):186-90. PubMed ID: 15064663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Auditory brainstem activity and development evoked by apical versus basal cochlear implant electrode stimulation in children.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Aug; 118(8):1671-84. PubMed ID: 17588811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Representations of Time-Varying Cochlear Implant Stimulation in Auditory Cortex of Awake Marmosets (
    Johnson LA; Della Santina CC; Wang X
    J Neurosci; 2017 Jul; 37(29):7008-7022. PubMed ID: 28634306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Unilateral cochlear implant use promotes normal-like loudness perception in adolescents with childhood deafness.
    Steel MM; Abbasalipour P; Salloum CA; Hasek D; Papsin BC; Gordon KA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):e291-301. PubMed ID: 25072236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Electric-acoustic pitch comparisons in single-sided-deaf cochlear implant users: frequency-place functions and rate pitch.
    Schatzer R; Vermeire K; Visser D; Krenmayr A; Kals M; Voormolen M; Van de Heyning P; Zierhofer C
    Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():26-35. PubMed ID: 24252455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Electrophysiological evidence for altered visual, but not auditory, selective attention in adolescent cochlear implant users.
    Harris J; Kamke MR
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Nov; 78(11):1908-16. PubMed ID: 25242699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Perceptual changes with monopolar and phantom electrode stimulation.
    Klawitter S; Landsberger DM; Büchner A; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():64-75. PubMed ID: 29325874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Development of electrophysiological and behavioural measures of electrode discrimination in adult cochlear implant users.
    Mathew R; Vickers D; Boyle P; Shaida A; Selvadurai D; Jiang D; Undurraga J
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():74-87. PubMed ID: 30031354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Incidence and characteristics of facial nerve stimulation in children with cochlear implants.
    Cushing SL; Papsin BC; Gordon KA
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Oct; 116(10):1787-91. PubMed ID: 17003731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A potential neurophysiological correlate of electric-acoustic pitch matching in adult cochlear implant users: Pilot data.
    Tan CT; Martin BA; Svirsky MA
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 Jul; 19(4):198-209. PubMed ID: 29508662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Delayed low frequency hearing loss caused by cochlear implantation interventions via the round window but not cochleostomy.
    Rowe D; Chambers S; Hampson A; Eastwood H; Campbell L; O'Leary S
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():49-57. PubMed ID: 26739790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A Cochlear Implant Performance Prognostic Test Based on Electrical Field Interactions Evaluated by eABR (Electrical Auditory Brainstem Responses).
    Guevara N; Hoen M; Truy E; Gallego S
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155008. PubMed ID: 27149268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Lateralization of interimplant timing and level differences in children who use bilateral cochlear implants.
    Salloum CA; Valero J; Wong DD; Papsin BC; van Hoesel R; Gordon KA
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):441-56. PubMed ID: 20489647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Characterizing responses from auditory cortex in young people with several years of cochlear implant experience.
    Gordon KA; Tanaka S; Wong DD; Papsin BC
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Oct; 119(10):2347-62. PubMed ID: 18752993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Spectro-temporal cues enhance modulation sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
    Zheng Y; Escabí M; Litovsky RY
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():45-54. PubMed ID: 28601530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing.
    Gantz BJ; Turner C; Gfeller KE; Lowder MW
    Laryngoscope; 2005 May; 115(5):796-802. PubMed ID: 15867642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Bilateral cochlear implants in children: localization acuity measured with minimum audible angle.
    Litovsky RY; Johnstone PM; Godar S; Agrawal S; Parkinson A; Peters R; Lake J
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):43-59. PubMed ID: 16446564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.