BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7775058)

  • 1. Shifting attention in visual space: the effects of peripheral cueing on brain cortical potentials.
    Anllo-Vento L
    Int J Neurosci; 1995; 80(1-4):353-70. PubMed ID: 7775058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of temporal predictability on exogenous attentional modulation of feedforward processing in the striate cortex.
    Dassanayake TL; Michie PT; Fulham R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Jul; 105():9-16. PubMed ID: 27114044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The time course of the effects of central and peripheral cues on visual processing: an event-related potentials study.
    Doallo S; Lorenzo-López L; Vizoso C; Rodríguez Holguín S; Amenedo E; Bará S; Cadaveira F
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jan; 115(1):199-210. PubMed ID: 14706489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Deconstructing Reorienting of Attention: Cue Predictiveness Modulates the Inhibition of the No-target Side and the Hemispheric Distribution of the P1 Response to Invalid Targets.
    Doricchi F; Pellegrino M; Marson F; Pinto M; Caratelli L; Cestari V; Rossi-Arnaud C; Lasaponara S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Jun; 32(6):1046-1060. PubMed ID: 31967519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electroencephalographic activity associated with shifts of visuospatial attention.
    Yamaguchi S; Tsuchiya H; Kobayashi S
    Brain; 1994 Jun; 117 ( Pt 3)():553-62. PubMed ID: 8032865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Changes in predictive cuing modulate the hemispheric distribution of the P1 inhibitory response to attentional targets.
    Lasaponara S; D' Onofrio M; Dragone A; Pinto M; Caratelli L; Doricchi F
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 May; 99():156-164. PubMed ID: 28283318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrophysiological correlates to cued attentional shifts in the visual and auditory modalities.
    Hugdahl K; Nordby H
    Behav Neural Biol; 1994 Jul; 62(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 7945141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ERP evidence for selective drop in attentional costs in uncertain environments: challenging a purely premotor account of covert orienting of attention.
    Lasaponara S; Chica AB; Lecce F; Lupianez J; Doricchi F
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jul; 49(9):2648-57. PubMed ID: 21640737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cueing effects on semantic and perceptual categorization: ERPs reveal differential effects of validity as a function of processing stage.
    Lai G; Mangels JA
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 May; 45(9):2038-50. PubMed ID: 17382975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamics of the spatial scale of visual attention revealed by brain event-related potentials.
    Luo YJ; Greenwood PM; Parasuraman R
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2001 Dec; 12(3):371-81. PubMed ID: 11689297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial cueing, sensory gating and selective response preparation: an ERP study on visuo-spatial orienting.
    Eimer M
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993; 88(5):408-20. PubMed ID: 7691565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The attentional effects of peripheral cueing as revealed by two event-related potential studies.
    Fu S; Fan S; Chen L; Zhuo Y
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Jan; 112(1):172-85. PubMed ID: 11137676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microsaccade-related brain potentials signal the focus of visuospatial attention.
    Meyberg S; Werkle-Bergner M; Sommer W; Dimigen O
    Neuroimage; 2015 Jan; 104():79-88. PubMed ID: 25285375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Express attentional re-engagement but delayed entry into consciousness following invalid spatial cues in visual search.
    Brisson B; Jolicoeur P
    PLoS One; 2008; 3(12):e3967. PubMed ID: 19088847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of aging on visuospatial attention: an ERP study.
    Curran T; Hills A; Patterson MB; Strauss ME
    Neuropsychologia; 2001; 39(3):288-301. PubMed ID: 11163607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modulation of Neuronal Responses by Exogenous Attention in Macaque Primary Visual Cortex.
    Wang F; Chen M; Yan Y; Zhaoping L; Li W
    J Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 35(39):13419-29. PubMed ID: 26424888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Deficient inhibition of return for emotional faces in depression.
    Dai Q; Feng Z
    Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry; 2009 Aug; 33(6):921-32. PubMed ID: 19394388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bias for the left visual field in rapid serial visual presentation: effects of additional salient cues suggest a critical role of attention.
    Śmigasiewicz K; Asanowicz D; Westphal N; Verleger R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Feb; 27(2):266-79. PubMed ID: 25203275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perception of static eye gaze direction facilitates subsequent early visual processing.
    Schuller AM; Rossion B
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 May; 115(5):1161-8. PubMed ID: 15066541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrophysiologic correlates of age effects on visuospatial attention shift.
    Yamaguchi S; Tsuchiya H; Kobayashi S
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 1995 Dec; 3(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 8719021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.