BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7775118)

  • 1. The statistical interpretation of blue-on-yellow visual field loss.
    Wild JM; Moss ID; Whitaker D; O'Neill EC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Jun; 36(7):1398-410. PubMed ID: 7775118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Blue-on-yellow visual field and retinal nerve fiber layer in ocular hypertension and glaucoma.
    Teesalu P; Airaksinen PJ; Tuulonen A
    Ophthalmology; 1998 Nov; 105(11):2077-81. PubMed ID: 9818609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correlation of blue-on-yellow visual fields with scanning confocal laser optic disc measurements.
    Teesalu P; Vihanninjoki K; Airaksinen PJ; Tuulonen A; Läärä E
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Nov; 38(12):2452-9. PubMed ID: 9375562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of age-related cataract on blue-on-yellow perimetry.
    Moss ID; Wild JM; Whitaker DJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Apr; 36(5):764-73. PubMed ID: 7706024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Correlation between glaucomatous hemifield scotomas in white-on-white perimetry and blue-on-yellow perimetry using the oculus twinfield perimeter].
    Denk PO; Markovic M; Knorr M
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 Feb; 221(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 14986209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence for a learning effect in short-wavelength automated perimetry.
    Wild JM; Kim LS; Pacey IE; Cunliffe IA
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 16458091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fluorometry of the crystalline lens for correcting blue-on-yellow perimetry results.
    Teesalu P; Airaksinen PJ; Tuulonen A; Nieminen H; Alanko H
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Mar; 38(3):697-703. PubMed ID: 9071224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Short-wavelength perimetry in diagnosis of early glaucoma: comparison with standard automated perimetry].
    Qi S; Jiang Y
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Jan; 38(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 11955298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects.
    Chauhan BC; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Mar; 40(3):648-56. PubMed ID: 10067968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
    Bozkurt B; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M
    J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frequency doubling technology perimetry in open-angle glaucoma eyes with hemifield visual field damage: comparison of high-tension and normal-tension groups.
    Murata H; Tomidokoro A; Matsuo H; Tomita G; Araie M
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 17224743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Corneal thickness measurements and frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities in ocular hypertensive eyes.
    Medeiros FA; Sample PA; Weinreb RN
    Ophthalmology; 2003 Oct; 110(10):1903-8. PubMed ID: 14522761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Repeatability of the Glaucoma Hemifield Test in automated perimetry.
    Katz J; Quigley HA; Sommer A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Jul; 36(8):1658-64. PubMed ID: 7601645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contrasting blue-on-yellow with white-on-white visual fields: Roles of visual adaptation for healthy peri- or postmenopausal women younger than 70 years of age.
    Eisner A; Toomey MD; Incognito LJ; O'malley JP; Samples JR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5605-14. PubMed ID: 17122155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computer-assisted interpretation of visual fields in glaucoma.
    Asman P
    Acta Ophthalmol Suppl (1985); 1992; (206):1-47. PubMed ID: 1467748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term fluctuation in short-wavelength automated perimetry in glaucoma suspects and glaucoma patients.
    Hutchings N; Hosking SL; Wild JM; Flanagan JG
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Sep; 42(10):2332-7. PubMed ID: 11527947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testing for glaucoma with frequency-doubling perimetry in normals, ocular hypertensives, and glaucoma patients.
    Horn FK; Wakili N; Jünemann AM; Korth M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 240(8):658-65. PubMed ID: 12192460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistical aspects of the normal visual field in short-wavelength automated perimetry.
    Wild JM; Cubbidge RP; Pacey IE; Robinson R
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1998 Jan; 39(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 9430545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of two fast strategies, SITA Fast and TOP, for the assessment of visual fields in glaucoma patients.
    King AJ; Taguri A; Wadood AC; Azuara-Blanco A
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Jun; 240(6):481-7. PubMed ID: 12107516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.