These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7776157)

  • 1. Detection of periodontal probing change by analysis of distribution mean and skew.
    Cohen ME
    J Periodontal Res; 1995 Mar; 30(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 7776157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability of single and double probing attachment level measurements.
    Zappa U; Simona C; Graf H; Case D; Thomas J
    J Clin Periodontol; 1995 Oct; 22(10):764-71. PubMed ID: 8682923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A quantile plot for simultaneous representation of clinical and statistical attributes of probing change: application to early identification of the downhill patient.
    Cohen ME; Horning GM
    J Periodontal Res; 1998 May; 33(4):187-95. PubMed ID: 9689614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Site-specific attachment level change detected by physical probing in untreated chronic adult periodontitis: review of studies 1982-1997.
    Breen HJ; Johnson NW; Rogers PA
    J Periodontol; 1999 Mar; 70(3):312-28. PubMed ID: 10225549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Periodontal disease progression.
    Reddy MS; Geurs NC; Jeffcoat RL; Proskin H; Jeffcoat MK
    J Periodontol; 2000 Oct; 71(10):1583-90. PubMed ID: 11063391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Option-4 algorithm for third generation disc probe: agreement of selected site-specific relative attachment level measurements and detection of longitudinal site-specific attachment level change.
    Breen HJ; Rogers PA; Slaney RE; Gillett IR; Johnson NW
    J Periodontol; 1999 Feb; 70(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 10102553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship between crevicular aspartate aminotransferase levels and periodontal disease progression.
    Oringer RJ; Howell TH; Nevins ML; Reasner DS; Davis GH; Sekler J; Fiorellini JP
    J Periodontol; 2001 Jan; 72(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 11210069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A study of the reliability of a no disease progression conclusion.
    Hujoel PP
    J Periodontol; 1997 Feb; 68(2):152-7. PubMed ID: 9058333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction and diagnosis of attachment loss by enhanced chemiluminescent assay of crevicular fluid alkaline phosphatase levels.
    Chapple IL; Garner I; Saxby MS; Moscrop H; Matthews JB
    J Clin Periodontol; 1999 Mar; 26(3):190-8. PubMed ID: 10100046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating the validity of probing attachment loss as a surrogate for tooth mortality in a clinical trial on the elderly.
    Hujoel PP; Leroux BG; DeRouen TA; Powell LV; Kiyak HA
    J Dent Res; 1997 Apr; 76(4):858-66. PubMed ID: 9126182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Current interpretations of periodontal probing evaluations: diagnostic and therapeutic implications.
    Greenstein G
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2005 Jun; 26(6):381-2, 384, 387-90 passim; quiz 398-9. PubMed ID: 16021957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The strategy and advantage in use of an electronic probe for attachment measurement.
    Clark WB; Magnusson I; Namgung YY; Yang MC
    Adv Dent Res; 1993 Aug; 7(2):152-7. PubMed ID: 8260002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identifying losing sites at periodontal reevaluation.
    O'Reilly PG; Claffey NM
    Curr Opin Periodontol; 1996; 3():68-77. PubMed ID: 8624571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is loss of attachment due to root planning and scaling in sites with minimal probing depths a statistical or real occurrence?
    Gunsolley JC; Yeung GM; Butler JH; Waldrop TC
    J Periodontol; 2001 Mar; 72(3):349-53. PubMed ID: 11327062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Option-4 algorithm for automated disc probe: reduction in the variance of site-specific relative attachment level measurements.
    Breen HJ; Rogers PA; Slaney RE; Lawless HC; Austin JS; Gillett IR; Johnson NW
    J Periodontol; 1997 May; 68(5):456-66. PubMed ID: 9182741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How to evaluate a diagnostic test.
    Eckert SE; Goldstein GR; Koka S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Apr; 83(4):386-91. PubMed ID: 10756286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Studies on the relationship between changes in radiographic bone height and probing attachment.
    Hausmann E; Allen K; Norderyd J; Ren W; Shibly O; Machtei E
    J Clin Periodontol; 1994 Feb; 21(2):128-32. PubMed ID: 8144732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improvements in methods of periodontal probing: comparison of relative attachment level data selected by outlier reduction protocols from Florida disc probe measurements.
    Breen HJ; Rogers PA; Johnson NW
    J Clin Periodontol; 2002 Aug; 29(8):679-87. PubMed ID: 12390563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Class enumeration false positive in skew-t family of continuous growth mixture models.
    Guerra-Peña K; García-Batista ZE; Depaoli S; Garrido LE
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231525. PubMed ID: 32302350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reproducibility of clinical attachment level and probing depth of a manual probe and a computerized electronic probe.
    Alves Rde V; Machion L; Andia DC; Casati MZ; Sallum AW; Sallum EA
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2005 Jan; 7(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 15736893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.