599 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7776666)
21. Aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 70 years: improved outcome with mechanical versus biologic prostheses.
Brown ML; Schaff HV; Lahr BD; Mullany CJ; Sundt TM; Dearani JA; McGregor CG; Orszulak TA
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Apr; 135(4):878-84; discussion 884. PubMed ID: 18374773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Long-term performance of the Hancock porcine bioprosthesis in the tricuspid position. A review of forty-five patients with fourteen-year follow-up.
Guerra F; Bortolotti U; Thiene G; Milano A; Mazzucco A; Talenti E; Stellin G; Gallucci V
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1990 May; 99(5):838-45. PubMed ID: 2329821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Replacement of the tricuspid valve in children with congenital cardiac malformations.
Kawahira Y; Yagihara T; Uemura H; Yoshizumi K; Yoshikawa Y; Kitamura S
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Sep; 9(5):636-40. PubMed ID: 11041177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. An eight-year experience with porcine bioprosthetic cardiac valves.
Hartz RS; Fisher EB; Finkelmeier B; DeBoer A; Sanders JH; Moran JM; Michaelis LL
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Jun; 91(6):910-7. PubMed ID: 3713240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The risk and outcomes of reoperative tricuspid valve surgery.
Jeganathan R; Armstrong S; Al-Alao B; David T
Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Jan; 95(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 23103002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Twenty-five year outcomes of tricuspid valve replacement comparing mechanical and biologic prostheses.
Garatti A; Nano G; Bruschi G; Canziani A; Colombo T; Frigiola A; Martinelli L; Menicanti L
Ann Thorac Surg; 2012 Apr; 93(4):1146-53. PubMed ID: 22342993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Tricuspid valve prosthetic replacement. Early and late results with the Starr-Edwards prosthesis.
Sanfelippo PM; Giuliani ER; Danielson GK; Wallace RB; Pluth JR; McGoon DC
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1976 Mar; 71(3):441-5. PubMed ID: 1249978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Effect of surgical treatment of tricuspid regurgitation late after valve replacement of left heart].
Hou XT; Meng X; Li W; Wang JG
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Dec; 85(47):3362-4. PubMed ID: 16409846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Prosthetic replacement of the tricuspid valve: biological or mechanical?
Rizzoli G; De Perini L; Bottio T; Minutolo G; Thiene G; Casarotto D
Ann Thorac Surg; 1998 Dec; 66(6 Suppl):S62-7. PubMed ID: 9930419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Early and late prognosis after reoperation for prosthetic valve replacement.
Bosch X; Pomar JL; Pelletier LC
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Oct; 88(4):567-72. PubMed ID: 6482488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Long-term results of porcine bioprostheses in the tricuspid position.
Jegaden O; Perinetti M; Barthelet M; Vedrinne C; Delahaye F; Montagna P; Mikaeloff PH
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6(5):256-60. PubMed ID: 1610594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Bioprosthetic versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in the elderly.
Davis EA; Greene PS; Cameron DE; Gott VI; Laschinger JC; Stuart RS; Sussman MS; Watkins L; Baumgartner WA
Circulation; 1996 Nov; 94(9 Suppl):II121-5. PubMed ID: 8901731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Prosthetic replacement of tricuspid valve: bioprosthetic or mechanical.
Kaplan M; Kut MS; Demirtas MM; Cimen S; Ozler A
Ann Thorac Surg; 2002 Feb; 73(2):467-73. PubMed ID: 11845861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Long-term outcomes of tricuspid valve replacement in the current era.
Filsoufi F; Anyanwu AC; Salzberg SP; Frankel T; Cohn LH; Adams DH
Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Sep; 80(3):845-50. PubMed ID: 16122441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Repair of tricuspid valve insufficiency in patients undergoing double (aortic and mitral) valve replacement. Perioperative mortality and long-term (1 to 20 years) follow-up in 109 patients.
Mullany CJ; Gersh BJ; Orszulak TA; Schaff HV; Puga FJ; Ilstrup DM; Pluth JR; Danielson GK
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Nov; 94(5):740-8. PubMed ID: 3669702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Long term results comparing mechanical and biological prostheses in the tricuspid valve position: which valve types are better--mechanical or biological prostheses?
Songur CM; Simsek E; Ozen A; Kocabeyoglu S; Donmez TA
Heart Lung Circ; 2014 Dec; 23(12):1175-8. PubMed ID: 25153357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The St. Jude Medical bileaflet valve prosthesis. A 5 year experience.
Chaux A; Czer LS; Matloff JM; DeRobertis MA; Stewart ME; Bateman TM; Kass RM; Lee ME; Gray RJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Nov; 88(5 Pt 1):706-17. PubMed ID: 6492839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Isolated tricuspid valve replacement. Long-term results].
Do QB; Pellerin M; Carrier M; Cartier R; Hébert Y; Pagé P; Perrault LP; Pelletier LC
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 2000 Sep; 93(9):1119-24. PubMed ID: 11055003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Mid-term clinical and echocardiographic follow up of patients with CarboMedics valves in the tricuspid position.
Shapira Y; Nili M; Hirsch R; Vaturi M; Vidne B; Sagie A
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):396-402. PubMed ID: 10888097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Mechanical valve replacement in congenital heart disease in children.
Lubiszewska B; Rozanski J; Szufladowicz M; Szaroszyk W; Hoffman P; Ksiezycka E; Rydlewska-Sadowska W; Ruzyllo W
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 10096487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
