These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. CONVERTING THE 'RIGHT TO LIFE' TO THE 'RIGHT TO PHYSICIAN-ASSISTED SUICIDE AND EUTHANASIA': AN ANALYSIS OF CARTER V CANADA (ATTORNEY GENERAL), SUPREME COURT OF CANADA. Chan B; Somerville M Med Law Rev; 2016; 24(2):143-75. PubMed ID: 27099364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Assisted suicide laws create discriminatory double standard for who gets suicide prevention and who gets suicide assistance: Not Dead Yet responds to Autonomy, Inc. Coleman D Disabil Health J; 2010 Jan; 3(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 21122767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The right to die. N Y Times Web; 2005 Oct; ():A26. PubMed ID: 16231462 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Who decides if there is "triumph in the ultimate agony?" Constitutional theory and the emerging right to die with dignity. Goebel BC William Mary Law Rev; 1996; 37(2):827-901. PubMed ID: 12173637 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Washington v. Glucksberg and Vacco v. Quill prohibitions on assisted suicide do not violate the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Kawamura A J Contemp Law; 1998; 24(1):167-77. PubMed ID: 14628852 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Whose life is it anyway?: an analysis and commentary on the emerging law of physician-assisted suicide. Gaumer CP; Griffith PR S D Law Rev; 1997; 42(3):357-98. PubMed ID: 16086516 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. An Illinois Physician-Assisted Suicide Act: a merciful end to a terminally ill criminal tradition. Daniels PG Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 1997; 28(4):763-837. PubMed ID: 16523578 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Assisted suicide, the Supreme Court, and the constitutive function of the law. Kaveny MC Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(5):29-34. PubMed ID: 9383665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. The constitutionality of statutes prohibiting and permitting physician-assisted suicide. Rosenn JR Univ Miami Law Rev; 1997 Apr; 51(3):875-905. PubMed ID: 12953670 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Kevorkian v. Arnett. United States. District Court. Central District Court of California Fed Suppl; 1996; 939():725-32. PubMed ID: 16285108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. A democratic decision. No constitutional support for assisted suicide. Burns LP Mich Health Hosp; 1997; 33(5):24. PubMed ID: 10173293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Can the right to autonomy be resuscitated after Glucksberg? Safranek JP; Safranek SJ Univ Colo Law Rev; 1998; 69(3):731-57. PubMed ID: 16086508 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Physician-assisted suicide: new protocol for a rightful death. O'Brien CN; Madek GA Neb Law Rev; 1998; 77(2):229-80. PubMed ID: 12769108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Prohibition on assisting a suicide is interference with rights of severely disabled people, UK Supreme Court is told. Dyer C BMJ; 2013 Dec; 347():f7589. PubMed ID: 24352939 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Constitutional tragedy in dying: responses to some common arguments against the constitutional right to die. Fleming JE Fordham Urban Law J; 1997; 24(4):881-9. PubMed ID: 12455518 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Kevorkian again not guilty of aiding suicide. Lessenberry J N Y Times Web; 1996 Mar; ():7. PubMed ID: 11647123 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. The court upholds a state law prohibiting physician-assisted suicide. Feinberg B J Crim Law Criminol; 1998; 88(3):847-76. PubMed ID: 12455522 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]