These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7776723)
61. Right-to-die debate continues in legislatures and courts. Hosp Ethics; 1993; 9(3):9-10. PubMed ID: 10125692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Justices explore U.S. authority over states in assisted suicide. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 2005 Oct; ():A1, A32. PubMed ID: 16231463 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
63. The Supreme Court and physician-assisted suicide--the ultimate right. Angell M N Engl J Med; 1997 Jan; 336(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 8970940 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
64. Medically assisted suicide in Italy: the recent judgment of the Constitutional Court. Delbon P; Maghin F; Conti A Clin Ter; 2021 May; 172(3):193-196. PubMed ID: 33956035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. The last best place to die: physician-assisted suicide and Montana's constitutional right to personal autonomy privacy. Fisk SA Mont Law Rev; 1998; 59(2):301-41. PubMed ID: 14631926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. Physician-assisted suicide: should Texas be different? Trenaman-Molin L Houst Law Rev; 1997; 33(5):1475-520. PubMed ID: 12627557 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
67. Is there a right to physician-assisted suicide? Bleich JD Fordham Urban Law J; 1997; 24(4):795-815. PubMed ID: 12455512 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
70. Disorder in the court: physician-assisted suicide and the Constitution. Burt RA Minn Law Rev; 1998 Apr; 82(4):965-81. PubMed ID: 11865918 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
71. "We just happen to live here": two social workers share their stories about Oregon's Death with Dignity Law. Miller PJ; Hedlund SC J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care; 2005; 1(1):71-86. PubMed ID: 17387057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Vacco v. Quill. Coleson RE Issues Law Med; 1997; 13(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 9479885 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. Punishing assisted suicide: where legislators should fear to tread. Rogers JK Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1994; 20(3):647-58. PubMed ID: 12199244 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. The role of courts in the debate on assisted suicide: a communitarian approach. Beschle DL Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1995; 9(2):367-405. PubMed ID: 11653000 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
76. MPs back guidance on assisted suicide in first Commons debate for 40 years. Dyer C BMJ; 2012 Mar; 344():e2424. PubMed ID: 22461495 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
77. The right to assisted suicide and euthanasia. Gorsuch NM Harv J Law Public Policy; 2000; 23(2):599-710. PubMed ID: 12524693 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. Washington v. Glucksberg. Coleson RE Issues Law Med; 1997; 13(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 9479884 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
79. Michigan versus Kevorkian. Kaplan KJ; McKeon C Omega (Westport); 1999-2000; 40(1):271-4. PubMed ID: 12580200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. The Oregon Death with Dignity Act: a successful model or a legal anomaly vulnerable to attack? Boyle B Houst Law Rev; 2004; 40(5):1387-421. PubMed ID: 16189902 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]