These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7777040)

  • 21. Science policy. Peer-review critic gets NIH 'rejects'.
    Malakoff D
    Science; 2001 Nov; 294(5545):1255-7. PubMed ID: 11701895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Researchers face 'Catch-22' grants trap.
    Ibáñez CF
    Nature; 1999 Mar; 398(6725):280. PubMed ID: 10192324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Research funding: peer review at NIH.
    Scarpa T
    Science; 2006 Jan; 311(5757):41. PubMed ID: 16400135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. National Institutes of Health. Zerhouni's parting message: make room for young scientists.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2008 Nov; 322(5903):834-5. PubMed ID: 18988813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. National Institutes of Health. Changes in peer review target young scientists, heavyweights.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2008 Jun; 320(5882):1404. PubMed ID: 18556519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Recent changes in NIH peer review system.
    Demsey A
    Physiologist; 1988 Dec; 31(6):155-6. PubMed ID: 3237781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Enhancing NIH grant peer review: a broader perspective.
    Bonetta L
    Cell; 2008 Oct; 135(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 18957192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Biomedical research. NIH plans new grants for innovative minds.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2003 Aug; 301(5635):902. PubMed ID: 12920271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. NIH response to open letter.
    Fauci AS; Zerhouni EA
    Science; 2005 Apr; 308(5718):49. PubMed ID: 15802584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Shorter NIH grant form launches.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2010 Jan; 463(7277):12-3. PubMed ID: 20054365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. American Idol and NIH Grant Review.
    Pagano M
    Cell; 2006 Aug; 126(4):637-8. PubMed ID: 16923379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. American Idol and NIH grant review--redux.
    Munger K
    Cell; 2006 Nov; 127(4):661-2; author reply 664-5. PubMed ID: 17110320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Biomedical politics. NIH roiled by inquiries over grants hit list.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2003 Oct; 302(5646):758. PubMed ID: 14593135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Biomedical policy. NIH wins an exemption from HHS peer-review overhaul.
    Marshall E
    Science; 2001 Aug; 293(5533):1234. PubMed ID: 11509695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. NIH: grants revamp needs grounding in evidence.
    Hannun YA
    Nature; 2008 Apr; 452(7189):811. PubMed ID: 18421328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. NIH peer review: time for some changes.
    Nat Biotechnol; 1998 May; 16(5):395. PubMed ID: 9592372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. NIH rating system.
    Gibson AR
    Science; 1996 Aug; 273(5275):562. PubMed ID: 8701302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Early success claimed for Zerhouni's NIH roadmap.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2004 Oct; 431(7011):886. PubMed ID: 15496879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. AIDS office opposes outside planning.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1996 May; 381(6577):5. PubMed ID: 8609987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Understanding the NIH review process: a brief guide to writing grant proposals in neurotoxicology.
    Audesirk G; Burbacher T; Guilarte TR; Laughlin NK; Lopachin R; Suszkiw J; Tilson H
    Neurotoxicology; 1999 Feb; 20(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 10091862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.