These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7777849)

  • 1. Russia readies its first gene law.
    Allakhverdov A
    Science; 1995 Jun; 268(5217):1558. PubMed ID: 7777849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Europe/Japan face up to legal hurdles to cloning.
    Michael A
    Nat Biotechnol; 1997 Jul; 15(7):609-10. PubMed ID: 9219253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Britain opens biotech regulation to greater public involvement.
    Masood E
    Nature; 1999 May; 399(6734):287-8. PubMed ID: 10360555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Regulation as facilitation: negotiating the genetic revolution.
    Black J
    Mod Law Rev; 1998 Sep; 61(5):621-60. PubMed ID: 14518446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genetic engineering. New law needs changes made.
    Dickman S
    Nature; 1990 Jan; 343(6256):298. PubMed ID: 2300178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cloning sparks calls for new laws.
    Williams N
    Science; 1997 Mar; 275(5305):1415. PubMed ID: 9072803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The governance of human genetics: policy discourse and constructions of public trust.
    Jones M; Salter B
    New Genet Soc; 2003 Apr; 22(1):21-41. PubMed ID: 15282897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genetic engineering. New advisory board approved.
    McGourty C
    Nature; 1989 Oct; 341(6244):681. PubMed ID: 2797199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Who's afraid of biotechnology?
    Tait J
    New Sci; 1992 Jun; 134(1827):49. PubMed ID: 16044585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Cambridge model: how public oversight of biotech is good for everyone--even business.
    Lipson S
    Genewatch; 2003; 16(5):7-10. PubMed ID: 15025120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biologists mobilize against anti-genetics referendum.
    Koenig R
    Science; 1997 Jan; 275(5300):607-8. PubMed ID: 9019813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bio-patents, law and ethics. Critical analysis of the EU biotechnology directive.
    Van Overwalle G
    Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2003; (19):187-203. PubMed ID: 15032104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Panel weighs a law against cloning.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1997 May; 276(5316):1185-6. PubMed ID: 9182324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Britain regulates organism release.
    Webb B
    Nature; 1989 Oct; 341(6244):681. PubMed ID: 2797198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. EU ends 10-year battle over biopatents.
    Gavaghan H
    Science; 1998 May; 280(5367):1188. PubMed ID: 9634397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinton urges outlawing human cloning.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1997 Jun; 276(5319):1640. PubMed ID: 9206825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Put human cloning on hold, say bioethicists.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1997 Jul; 278(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 9207322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Short-circuit to be avoided by bioethics committees.
    Nature; 1997 May; 387(6631):321. PubMed ID: 9163403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The sanctity of life in a brave new world: a manifesto on biotechnology and human dignity.
    Council for Biotechnology Policy, USA
    Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 2003; 9(2):36-7. PubMed ID: 14964213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. European debate on biotech highlights policy differences.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 1996 Jan; 379(6562):197. PubMed ID: 8538779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.