These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7779167)

  • 1. Beyond Moore: issues of law and policy impacting human cell and genetic research in the age of biotechnology.
    Hartman RG
    J Leg Med; 1993 Sep; 14(3):463-77. PubMed ID: 7779167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Moore v. Regents of the University of California: patients, property rights, and public policy.
    Biagi KG
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1991; 35(2):433-62. PubMed ID: 16144099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patient autonomy and biomedical research: judicial compromise in Moore v. Regents of the University of California.
    LoBiondo AR
    Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1991; 1():277-305. PubMed ID: 16281328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Moore v. Regents of the University of California: expanded disclosure, limited property rights.
    Potts J
    Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1992; 86(2):453-96. PubMed ID: 11659500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recognizing property interests in bodily tissues. A need for legislative guidance.
    Parker PM
    J Leg Med; 1989 Jun; 10(2):357-75. PubMed ID: 2760536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outrageous fortune: selling other people's cells.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(6):36-9. PubMed ID: 2283288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Moore v. The Regents of the University of California: an ethical debate on informed consent and property rights in a patient's cells.
    Prowda JB
    J Pat Trademark Off Soc; 1995 Aug; 77(8):611-39. PubMed ID: 11658094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Living tissue and organ donors and property law: more on Moore.
    Dickens BM
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1992; 8():73-93. PubMed ID: 10183665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biotechnology, patients' rights, and the Moore case.
    Howard JJ
    Food Drug Cosmet Law J; 1989 Jul; 44(4):331-58. PubMed ID: 11659209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Controlling conflicts of interest in the doctor-patient relationship: lessons from Moore v. Regents of the University of California.
    Healey JM; Dowling KL
    Mercer Law Rev; 1991; 42(3):989-1005. PubMed ID: 11651440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biotechnology and the commercial use of human cells: toward an organic view of life and technology.
    Martin PA; Lagod ML
    Santa Clara Comput High Technol Law J; 1989 Jun; 5(2):211-61. PubMed ID: 11659674
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. From control over one's body to control over one's body parts: extending the doctrine of informed consent.
    Perley SN
    N Y Univ Law Rev; 1992 May; 67(2):335-65. PubMed ID: 11659626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biotechnology: a challenge for Hippocrates.
    Huynen S
    Auckl Univ Law Rev; 1991; 6(4):534-51. PubMed ID: 16127862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Proprietary rights in body parts: the relevance of Moore's case in Australia.
    Mortimer D
    Monash Univ Law Rev; 1993; 19(1):217-25. PubMed ID: 17333577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Second thoughts about U.S. Patent #4,438,032.
    Burrows B
    Bull Med Ethics; 1997 Jan; No. 124():11-4. PubMed ID: 11655049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The commercialization of human tissue -- the source of legal, ethical and social problems: an area better suited to legislative resolution.
    O'Connor JJ
    Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1990 Nov; 24(1):115-69. PubMed ID: 11659354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ethical considerations in informed consent for potential future use of human tissue samples.
    Adams M; Prentice ED; Oki GS
    IRB; 1996; 18(2):6-7. PubMed ID: 11654756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do the dead have interests? Policy issues for research after life.
    Nelkin D; Andrews L
    Am J Law Med; 1998; 24(2-3):261-91. PubMed ID: 9702275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An institutional policy on the right to benefit from the commercialization of human biological material.
    Prentice ED; Wiltse JC; Sharp JG; Antonson DL
    Law Med Health Care; 1990; 18(1-2):162-7. PubMed ID: 2374448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Whose waste is it anyway? The case of John Moore.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1988; 18(5):37-9. PubMed ID: 3066788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.