These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7779485)
1. Paperless medical records--approval still awaited. Lyle P Br J Gen Pract; 1995 Jan; 45(390):54. PubMed ID: 7779485 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Doctors and computers. . . . While limited and uncoordinated development of information technology curtails general practitioners. Bland M BMJ; 2003 Jan; 326(7382):220. PubMed ID: 12549439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. On shared records. Burns F Health Serv J; 2007 May; 117(6057):suppl 8. PubMed ID: 17582833 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Primary care. Net values. Mitchell P Health Serv J; 1998 Oct; 108(5628):suppl 2-5. PubMed ID: 10187505 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The English patient's EMR. Lowes R Med Econ; 2004 Apr; 81(7):23-4. PubMed ID: 15124295 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The paperless general practice. Purves IN BMJ; 1996 May; 312(7039):1112-3. PubMed ID: 8620119 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Why general practitioners use computers and hospital doctors do not--Part 2: scalability. Benson T BMJ; 2002 Nov; 325(7372):1090-3. PubMed ID: 12424172 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. What are the Read Codes? Booth N Health Libr Rev; 1994 Sep; 11(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 10139676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ten ways to improve information technology in the NHS. Majeed A BMJ; 2003 Jan; 326(7382):202-6. PubMed ID: 12543838 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Why general practitioners use computers and hospital doctors do not--Part 1: incentives. Benson T BMJ; 2002 Nov; 325(7372):1086-9. PubMed ID: 12424171 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Links between services. Stamp of approval. Cross M Health Serv J; 1993 Jul; 103(5363):33-4. PubMed ID: 10128112 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. To what extent are practices 'paperless' and what are the constraints to them becoming more so? Waring N Br J Gen Pract; 2000 Jan; 50(450):46-7. PubMed ID: 10695068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The electronic patient record in primary care--regression or progression? A cross sectional study. Hippisley-Cox J; Pringle M; Cater R; Wynn A; Hammersley V; Coupland C; Hapgood R; Horsfield P; Teasdale S; Johnson C BMJ; 2003 Jun; 326(7404):1439-43. PubMed ID: 12829558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. IT update/EPR. For the record. Cross M Health Serv J; 1997 Jan; 107(5538):suppl 7-8. PubMed ID: 10165728 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Change at the grass roots. Huntington J Health Serv J; 1990 Mar; 100(5190):324-5. PubMed ID: 10103969 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. GP data transfer could take 18 years. Carlisle D Health Serv J; 2005 Apr; 115(5953):15. PubMed ID: 15898237 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The electronic medical record in multi-site family practice. Part II: The implementation phase. Blair D; Schutte PC J Med Pract Manage; 2003; 19(3):131-6. PubMed ID: 14730816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. IT update/patient information. Fountain of knowledge. Hunter S Health Serv J; 1998 Mar; 108(5596):suppl 12-3. PubMed ID: 10179068 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. General practice records should be kept on CDs. Charlton J BMJ; 1996 Sep; 313(7057):628-9. PubMed ID: 8845725 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. General practice computerisation: lessons from the United Kingdom. Ellis NT; Kidd MR Med J Aust; 2000 Jan; 172(1):22-4. PubMed ID: 10682012 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]