These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7780274)

  • 1. [Sensitivity and specificity of masked field campimetry].
    Schiefer U; Pfau U; Selbmann HK; Wilhelm H; Zrenner E
    Ophthalmologe; 1995 Apr; 92(2):156-67. PubMed ID: 7780274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [White noise field campimetry. A new form of perimetric examination].
    Aulhorn E; Köst G
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1988 Apr; 192(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 3404938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [White-noise field campimetry before and after artificial increase of intraocular pressure. Possible applications in diagnosis and evaluation of glaucoma].
    Schiefer U; Ulrich WD; Ulrich C; Wilhelm H; Aulhorn E
    Ophthalmologe; 1992 Dec; 89(6):477-88. PubMed ID: 1486264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Detection of glaucomatous visual field defects using masking campimetry].
    Damm G; Lachenmayr BJ; Vivell PM
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1991; 88(6):838-42. PubMed ID: 1794816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Sensitivity of noise field campimetry as a screening method for glaucoma].
    Gramer E; Roesen B; Siebert M
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1991; 88(5):538-45. PubMed ID: 1757045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Results of Rauschfeld examinations with the Tübingen electronic campimeter. A comparison with current perimetry procedures].
    Schiefer U; Köst G; Aulhorn E
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1990; 87(5):508-15. PubMed ID: 2272584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Component perimetry: a fast method to detect visual field defects caused by brain lesions.
    Bachmann G; Fahle M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Sep; 41(10):2870-86. PubMed ID: 10967040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Perception of the blind spot with Rauschfeld campimetry. An additional diagnostic criterion in papillary changes].
    Aulhorn E; Schiefer U; Herzau V
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1990; 87(5):516-20. PubMed ID: 2272585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scotoma perception in white-noise-field campimetry and postchiasmal visual pathway lesions.
    Kolb M; Petersen D; Schiefer U; Kolb R; Skalej M
    Ger J Ophthalmol; 1995 Jul; 4(4):228-33. PubMed ID: 7492935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Evaluation of extensive visual field defects with computer-assisted kinetic perimetry].
    Schiefer U; Schiller J; Paetzold J; Dietrich TJ; Vonthein R; Besch D
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2001 Jan; 218(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 11225394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Correlation between glaucomatous hemifield scotomas in white-on-white perimetry and blue-on-yellow perimetry using the oculus twinfield perimeter].
    Denk PO; Markovic M; Knorr M
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 Feb; 221(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 14986209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Noise field findings in 24 patients with coronary heart disease].
    Erb C; Hettesheimer H; Stübiger N; Voelker W
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2000 Nov; 217(5):274-7. PubMed ID: 11146825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feasibility of saccadic vector optokinetic perimetry: a method of automated static perimetry for children using eye tracking.
    Murray IC; Fleck BW; Brash HM; Macrae ME; Tan LL; Minns RA
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Oct; 116(10):2017-26. PubMed ID: 19560207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Fundus-oriented perimetry. Evaluation of a new visual field examination method for detecting angioscotoma].
    Schiefer U; Stercken-Sorrenti G; Dietrich TJ; Friedrich M; Benda N
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1996; 209(2-3):62-71. PubMed ID: 8992085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Documentation of glaucomatous visual field defects in threshold and suprathreshold perimetry].
    Stark H
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1992 Mar; 200(3):187-98. PubMed ID: 1578877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Automated perimetry in ptosis and blepharochalasis].
    Klingele J; Kaiser HJ; Hatt M
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1995 May; 206(5):401-4. PubMed ID: 7609399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency doubling perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic disorders: a comparison with conventional automated perimetry.
    Wall M; Neahring RK; Woodward KR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Apr; 43(4):1277-83. PubMed ID: 11923276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [A new white-noise campimeter].
    Schiefer U; Stercken-Sorrenti G
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1993 Jan; 202(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 8464208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fundus perimetry with the Micro Perimeter 1 in normal individuals: comparison with conventional threshold perimetry.
    Springer C; Bültmann S; Völcker HE; Rohrschneider K
    Ophthalmology; 2005 May; 112(5):848-54. PubMed ID: 15878065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study.
    Iwase A; Tomidokoro A; Araie M; Shirato S; Shimizu H; Kitazawa Y;
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.