These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7780426)

  • 1. Evaluation of optimal stent size after endourologic incision of ureteral strictures.
    Moon YT; Kerbl K; Pearle MS; Gardner SM; McDougall EM; Humphrey P; Clayman RV
    J Endourol; 1995 Feb; 9(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 7780426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative study of ureteral stents following endoureterotomy in the porcine model: 3 vs 6 weeks and 7F vs 14F.
    Soria F; Sánchez FM; Sun F; Ezquerra J; Durán E; Usón J
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2005; 28(6):773-8. PubMed ID: 16059765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of stent duration on ureteral healing following endoureterotomy in an animal model.
    Kerbl K; Chandhoke PS; Figenshau RS; Stone AM; Clayman RV
    J Urol; 1993 Oct; 150(4):1302-5. PubMed ID: 8371418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of acucise endopyelotomy and endoballoon rupture for management of secondary proximal ureteral stricture in the porcine model.
    Nakada SY; Soble JJ; Gardner SM; Wolf JS; Figenshau RS; Pearle MS; Humphrey PA; Clayman RV
    J Endourol; 1996 Aug; 10(4):311-8. PubMed ID: 8872726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The unintubated ureterotomy endourologically revisited.
    Gardner SM; Wolf JS; Nakada SY; Moon YT; Figenshau RS; Pearle MS; Soble JJ; Humphrey PA; Clayman RV
    J Urol; 1996 Sep; 156(3):1160-3. PubMed ID: 8709338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of optimal stent size after antegrade endopyelotomy: an experimental study in the porcine model.
    Anidjar M; Meria P; Cochand-Priollet B; Cussenot O; Desgrandchamps F; Cortesse A; Teillac P; Le Duc A
    Eur Urol; 1997; 32(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 9286661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Endourologic treatment of ureteral strictures. Experimental comparative study].
    Soria Gálvez F; Rioja Sanz LA; Blas Marín M; Durán Flores ME; Usón Gargallo J
    Actas Urol Esp; 2005 Mar; 29(3):296-304. PubMed ID: 15945257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-Term Outcomes of Two Ipsilateral
    Mohyelden K; Hussein HA; El Helaly HA; Ibrahem H; Abdelwahab H
    J Endourol; 2021 Jun; 35(6):775-780. PubMed ID: 33096946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Metallic ureteral stents versus endoureterotomy as a therapeutic approach for experimental ureteral stricture.
    Soria F; Sun F; Durán E; Sánchez FM; Usón J
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2005 Apr; 16(4):521-9. PubMed ID: 15802452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Single Versus Double Ureteral Stent Placement After Laser Endoureterotomy for the Management of Benign Ureteral Strictures: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Ibrahim HM; Mohyelden K; Abdel-Bary A; Al-Kandari AM
    J Endourol; 2015 Oct; 29(10):1204-9. PubMed ID: 26102617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The 'buoy' stent: evaluation of a prototype indwelling ureteric stent in a porcine model.
    Krebs A; Deane LA; Borin JF; Edwards RA; Sala LG; Khan F; Abdelshehid C; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
    BJU Int; 2009 Jul; 104(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 19154469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Treatment of experimental ureteral strictures by endourological ureterotomy and implantation of stents in the porcine animal model.
    Soria F; Sun F; Sánchez FM; Ezquerra LJ; Díaz-Güemes I; Usón J
    Res Vet Sci; 2004 Feb; 76(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 14659732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Percutaneous endoscopic management of upper ureteral stricture size of stent.
    Hwang TK; Yoon JY; Ahn JH; Park YH
    J Urol; 1996 Mar; 155(3):882-4. PubMed ID: 8583598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Holmium:YAG laser endoureterotomy for treatment of ureteral stricture.
    Singal RK; Denstedt JD; Razvi HA; Chun SS
    Urology; 1997 Dec; 50(6):875-80. PubMed ID: 9426717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of retrograde endo-pyelotomy and endo-balloon rupture of the ureteropelvic junction in a porcine model.
    Pearle MS; Moon YT; Endicott RC; Gardner SM; Humphrey P; Clayman RV
    J Urol; 1994 Dec; 152(6 Pt 2):2232-9. PubMed ID: 7966717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Antireflux ureteral stent proof of concept assessment after minimally invasive treatment of obstructive uropathy in animal model.
    Soria F; Morcillo E; de la Cruz JE; Serrano A; Estebanez J; Sanz JL; Chicharro J; Pamplona M; Sanchez-Margallo FM
    Arch Esp Urol; 2018 Sep; 71(7):607-613. PubMed ID: 30198852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the use of a biodegradable ureteral stent after retrograde endopyelotomy in a porcine model.
    Olweny EO; Landman J; Andreoni C; Collyer W; Kerbl K; Onciu M; Välimaa T; Clayman RV
    J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):2198-202. PubMed ID: 11956478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Endoscopic treatment of ureteric strictures: acucise, cold-knife endoureterotomy and wall stents as a salvage approach.
    Erdogru T; Kutlu O; Koksal T; Danisman A; Usta MF; Kukul E; Baykara M
    Urol Int; 2005; 74(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 15756066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Success of laser endoureterotomy of ureteral strictures associated with ureteral stones is related to stone impaction.
    Gdor Y; Gabr AH; Faerber GJ; Roberts WW; Wolf JS
    J Endourol; 2008 Nov; 22(11):2507-11. PubMed ID: 19046090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanism of ureteral stent flow: a comparative in vivo study.
    Brewer AV; Elbahnasy AM; Bercowsky E; Maxwell KL; Shalhav AL; Kahn SA; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
    J Endourol; 1999 May; 13(4):269-71. PubMed ID: 10405904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.