These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7780436)

  • 1. Outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy monotherapy for large renal calculi: effect of stone and collecting system surface areas and cost-effectiveness of treatment.
    Murray MJ; Chandhoke PS; Berman CJ; Sankey NE
    J Endourol; 1995 Feb; 9(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 7780436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness and efficiency of shockwave lithotripsy vs flexible ureteroscopic holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole renal calculi.
    Koo V; Young M; Thompson T; Duggan B
    BJU Int; 2011 Dec; 108(11):1913-6. PubMed ID: 21453346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative results of shockwave lithotripsy for renal calculi in upper, middle, and lower calices.
    Turna B; Ekren F; Nazli O; Akbay K; Altay B; Ozyurt C; Cikili N
    J Endourol; 2007 Sep; 21(9):951-6. PubMed ID: 17941767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of treatment modalities for renal calculi between 100 and 300 mm2: are shockwave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy equivalent?
    Wiesenthal JD; Ghiculete D; D'A Honey RJ; Pace KT
    J Endourol; 2011 Mar; 25(3):481-5. PubMed ID: 21351888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Primary SWL Is an Efficient and Cost-Effective Treatment for Lower Pole Renal Stones Between 10 and 20 mm in Size: A Large Single Center Study.
    Chan LH; Good DW; Laing K; Phipps S; Thomas BG; Keanie JY; Tolley DA; Cutress ML
    J Endourol; 2017 May; 31(5):510-516. PubMed ID: 28355100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Which is more important in predicting the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of solitary renal stones: stone location or stone burden?
    Khalil MM
    J Endourol; 2012 May; 26(5):535-9. PubMed ID: 22050487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones in pediatric patients: a multivariate analysis model for estimating the stone-free probability.
    El-Nahas AR; El-Assmy AM; Awad BA; Elhalwagy SM; Elshal AM; Sheir KZ
    Int J Urol; 2013 Dec; 20(12):1205-10. PubMed ID: 23441845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is stone radiodensity a useful parameter for predicting outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for stones < or = 2 cm?
    Krishnamurthy MS; Ferucci PG; Sankey N; Chandhoke PS
    Int Braz J Urol; 2005; 31(1):3-8; discussion 9. PubMed ID: 15763001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does Previous Open Renal Stone Surgery Affect the Outcome of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Treatment in Adults with Renal Stones?
    Gültekin MH; Türegün FA; Ozkan B; Tülü B; Güleç GG; Tansu N; Demirdağ Ç; Kendigelen P; Erözenci A; Önal B
    J Endourol; 2017 Dec; 31(12):1295-1300. PubMed ID: 28891311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness of different treatment options for staghorn calculi.
    Chandhoke PS
    J Urol; 1996 Nov; 156(5):1567-71. PubMed ID: 8863539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Dornier Compact Delta lithotripter: the first 500 renal calculi.
    Lalak NJ; Moussa SA; Smith G; Tolley DA
    J Endourol; 2002 Feb; 16(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 11890447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High burden stones: the role of SWL.
    Zanetti G; Paparella S; Ferruti M; Gelosa M; Abed D; Rocco F
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2010 Mar; 82(1):43-4. PubMed ID: 20593719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness comparison of renal calculi treated with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy versus shockwave lithotripsy.
    Cone EB; Eisner BH; Ursiny M; Pareek G
    J Endourol; 2014 Jun; 28(6):639-43. PubMed ID: 24444144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for solitary lower pole renal calculi.
    May DJ; Chandhoke PS
    J Urol; 1998 Jan; 159(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 9400429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combined ureterorenoscopy and shockwave lithotripsy for large renal stone burden: an alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy?
    Hafron J; Fogarty JD; Boczko J; Hoenig DM
    J Endourol; 2005 May; 19(4):464-8. PubMed ID: 15910257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative follow-up of patients with acute and obtuse infundibulum-pelvic angle submitted to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for lower caliceal stones: preliminary report and proposed study design.
    Sampaio FJ; D'Anunciação AL; Silva EC
    J Endourol; 1997 Jun; 11(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 9181441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy in patients with solitary upper-caliceal stone influenced by anatomic differences in the pelvicaliceal system?
    Küpeli B; Acar C; Gürocak S; Güneri C; Karaoglan U; Bozkirli I
    J Endourol; 2007 Jan; 21(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 17263602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The success of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) in treating moderate-sized (10-20 mm) renal stones.
    Chung VY; Turney BW
    Urolithiasis; 2016 Oct; 44(5):441-4. PubMed ID: 26743071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of 2000 urinary calculi with the modulith SL-20: success and failure according to size and location of stones.
    Coz F; Orvieto M; Bustos M; Lyng R; Stein C; Hinrichs A; San Francisco I
    J Endourol; 2000 Apr; 14(3):239-46. PubMed ID: 10795612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Management of lower pole renal calculi: shock wave lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy.
    Preminger GM
    Urol Res; 2006 Apr; 34(2):108-11. PubMed ID: 16463145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.