BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7780759)

  • 1. A midwifery team for high-risk pregnancies.
    Bradshaw C; Lewis P; Steer P
    Mod Midwife; 1995 May; 5(5):26-9. PubMed ID: 7780759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Round table discussion. High-risk pregnancies. Cooperative work between the puericulturists and the midwives].
    Duron-Alirol M
    Soins Gynecol Obstet Pueric Pediatr; 1990 Oct; (113):37-40. PubMed ID: 2094048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of partnership caseload midwifery care with conventional team midwifery care: labour and birth outcomes.
    Benjamin Y; Walsh D; Taub N
    Midwifery; 2001 Sep; 17(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 11502143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An evaluation of Midwifery Group Practice. Part II: women's satisfaction.
    Fereday J; Collins C; Turnbull D; Pincombe J; Oster C
    Women Birth; 2009 Mar; 22(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 18926788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A model for the future. Certified nurse-midwives replace residents and house staff in hospitals.
    Ament LA; Hanson L
    Nurs Health Care Perspect; 1998; 19(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 10446546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Antenatal, delivery and postnatal comparisons of maternal satisfaction with two pilot Changing Childbirth schemes compared with a traditional model of care.
    Spurgeon P; Hicks C; Barwell F
    Midwifery; 2001 Jun; 17(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 11399133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Continuity of care in maternity services: women's views of one team midwifery scheme.
    Farquhar M; Camilleri-Ferrante C; Todd C
    Midwifery; 2000 Mar; 16(1):35-47. PubMed ID: 11139860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of Midwifery Group Practice. Part I: clinical effectiveness.
    Turnbull D; Baghurst P; Collins C; Cornwell C; Nixon A; Donnelan-Fernandez R; Antoniou G
    Women Birth; 2009 Mar; 22(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 19101219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. One-to-one midwifery.
    Farmer E; Chipperfield C
    Mod Midwife; 1996 Apr; 6(4):19-21. PubMed ID: 8788902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Swedish midwives' care of women who are at high obstetric risk or who have obstetric complications.
    Berg M; Dahlberg K
    Midwifery; 2001 Dec; 17(4):259-66. PubMed ID: 11749058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An exploration of midwives' views of the current system of maternity care in England.
    Lavender T; Chapple J
    Midwifery; 2004 Dec; 20(4):324-34. PubMed ID: 15571881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Goole midwifery suite.
    Smethurst G
    Pract Midwife; 1998 Oct; 1(10):21-3. PubMed ID: 10026581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Understanding grief. Grief and the concept of loss in midwifery practice. Part 2. Grief in obstetrics and midwifery.
    Powell A
    Prof Care Mother Child; 1997; 7(3):76-8. PubMed ID: 9277266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Obstetricians' resistance to independent, private practice by nurse-midwives in Washington, D.C. hospitals.
    Langton PA
    Women Health; 1994; 22(1):27-48. PubMed ID: 7900402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Eight midwives: balance in practice.
    Jonquil SG
    Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 1999; (49):19-20. PubMed ID: 10488309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of the birthplace and models of care on midwifery practice for the management of women in labour.
    Freeman LM; Adair V; Timperley H; West SH
    Women Birth; 2006 Dec; 19(4):97-105. PubMed ID: 17070742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conflicting ideologies as a source of emotion work in midwifery.
    Hunter B
    Midwifery; 2004 Sep; 20(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 15337282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A survey of midwives' views on providing aspects of antenatal care in Estonia.
    Lazarus JV; Rull K; Wyn Huws D; Rasch V; Liljestrand J
    Midwifery; 2008 Dec; 24(4):399-404. PubMed ID: 17881101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Collaborative practice. Characteristics, barriers, benefits, and implications for midwifery.
    Keleher KC
    J Nurse Midwifery; 1998; 43(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 9489285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. One-to-one midwifery.
    Beake S; Mulvaney-Carberry C
    Mod Midwife; 1996 Mar; 6(3):25-7. PubMed ID: 8696810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.