These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7781572)

  • 1. Comparison between median and ulnar sensitive action potential (SAP) obtained with two different stimulation methods.
    Premoselli S; Galimberti V; Cerri C
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1995 Mar; 35(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 7781572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Median and ulnar muscle and sensory evoked potentials.
    Felsenthal G
    Am J Phys Med; 1978 Aug; 57(4):167-82. PubMed ID: 696811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the antidromic sensory nerve action potentials obtained from all fingers on the same hand.
    Wee AS
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Mar; 42(2):125-8. PubMed ID: 11938595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Orthodromic vs antidromic sensory nerve latencies in healthy persons.
    Chodoroff G; Tashjian EA; Ellenberg MR
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1985 Sep; 66(9):589-91. PubMed ID: 4038022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Magnetic stimulation F-responses.
    Gominak S; Cros D; Shahani B
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990 Dec; 30(8):491-4. PubMed ID: 2286174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The consequences of stimulus intensity on sensory nerve action potentials.
    Nashed J; Calder K; Trachter R; McLean L
    J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Dec; 185(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 19772874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neuronal conduction studies of the median nerve in non-impaired humans: a comparison of accepted techniques.
    Nelson RM; Kaur H; Muniz E; Gasiewska E; Lugo J; Agro J; Nelson AJ; Rothman J
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2004; 44(5):281-7. PubMed ID: 15378867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of wrist thickness on amplitudes of sensory nerve action potentials.
    Chira-Adisai W; Yan K; Turan B
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Dec; 39(8):485-8. PubMed ID: 10627934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Averaged axillary F-loop latency of median and ulnar nerves.
    Hong CZ; Batkin F; Yu J; San Luis EB
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1988 Sep; 69(9):685-8. PubMed ID: 2844135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Recording of sensory action potential of digital nerves using needle electrodes].
    Müller HR; Muheim G
    Rev Neurol (Paris); 1969 Jun; 120(6):432-5. PubMed ID: 5379330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Somatosensory evoked potentials following stimulation of digital nerves.
    Kwast-Rabben O; Libelius R; Heikkilä H
    Muscle Nerve; 2002 Oct; 26(4):533-8. PubMed ID: 12362420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The relationship between skin temperature and neuronal characteristics in the median, ulnar and radial nerves of non-impaired individuals.
    Moses B; Nelson RM; Nelson AJ; Cheifetz P
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2007; 47(7-8):351-60. PubMed ID: 18051629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of prolonged repetitive stimulation of median, ulnar and peroneal nerves.
    Baumann F; Henderson RD; Tremayne F; Hutchinson N; McCombe PA
    Muscle Nerve; 2010 Jun; 41(6):785-93. PubMed ID: 20169590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contribution of reference electrode to the compound muscle action potential.
    Nandedkar SD; Barkhaus PE
    Muscle Nerve; 2007 Jul; 36(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 17455266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cortical characterization and inter-dipole distance between unilateral median versus ulnar nerve stimulation of both hands in MEG.
    Theuvenet PJ; van Dijk BW; Peters MJ; van Ree JM; Lopes da Silva FL; Chen AC
    Brain Topogr; 2006; 19(1-2):29-42. PubMed ID: 16977490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Inter-examiner reliability of nerve conduction measurements].
    Hasegawa O; Mimura E; Kirigaya N; Wada N; Tsumura M; Iino M; Matsumoto S
    No To Shinkei; 1999 Dec; 51(12):1029-32. PubMed ID: 10654297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Median/ulnar premotor potential identification and localization.
    Dumitru D; King JC
    Muscle Nerve; 1995 May; 18(5):518-25. PubMed ID: 7739639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparison of mixed latency of ulnar and median nerve between wrist and elbow as diagnostic test of ulnar neuropathy in elbow].
    Poza JJ
    Neurologia; 2005 Mar; 20(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 15726472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of sensitivity of transcarpal median motor conduction velocity and conventional conduction techniques in electrodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.
    Chang MH; Liu LH; Lee YC; Wei SJ; Chiang HL; Hsieh PF
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 May; 117(5):984-91. PubMed ID: 16551510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensory potentials evoked by magnetic stimulation of the cervical spine.
    Zwarts MJ
    Muscle Nerve; 1993 Mar; 16(3):289-93. PubMed ID: 8446127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.