These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7781718)

  • 21. Esthetic evaluation of the facial profile in rehabilitated adults with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Ferrari Júnior FM; Ayub PV; Capelozza Filho L; Pereira Lauris JR; Garib DG
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 73(1):169.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25511967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Ranking facial attractiveness.
    Knight H; Keith O
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):340-8. PubMed ID: 16043472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Aesthetic evaluation of profile incisor inclination.
    Ghaleb N; Bouserhal J; Bassil-Nassif N
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Jun; 33(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 20716642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Facial esthetics in adolescents and its relationship to "ideal" ratios and angles.
    Kiekens RM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; van 't Hof MA; van 't Hof BE; Straatman H; Maltha JC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):188.e1-8. PubMed ID: 18249280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The aesthetic unit principle of facial aging.
    Tan SL; Brandt MG; Yeung JC; Doyle PC; Moore CC
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2015; 17(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 25411772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Development and Validation of a Clinical Assessment Tool for Platysmal Banding in Cervicomental Aesthetics of the Female Neck.
    Gupta S; Biskup N; Mattison G; Leis A
    Aesthet Surg J; 2015 Aug; 35(6):NP141-6. PubMed ID: 26229133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effects of computer-aided anteroposterior maxillary incisor movement on ratings of facial attractiveness.
    Schlosser JB; Preston CB; Lampasso J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jan; 127(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 15643410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of the aesthetic component of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need by Swedish orthodontists.
    Johansson AM; Follin ME
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Apr; 27(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 15817623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A new approach for the analysis of facial growth and age estimation: Iris ratio.
    Machado CEP; Flores MRP; Lima LNC; Tinoco RLR; Franco A; Bezerra ACB; Evison MP; Guimarães MA
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180330. PubMed ID: 28686631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessed facial normality after Twin Block therapy.
    Sattarzadeh AP; Lee RT
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):363-70. PubMed ID: 20133514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Development of the Cleft Aesthetic Rating Scale: A New Rating Scale for the Assessment of Nasolabial Appearance in Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients.
    Mosmuller DGM; Mennes LM; Prahl C; Kramer GJC; Disse MA; van Couwelaar GM; Niessen FB; Griot JPWD
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2017 Sep; 54(5):555-561. PubMed ID: 27537493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of facial esthetics by a panel of professionals and a lay panel.
    Ousehal L; Lazrak L; Serrhini I; Elquars F
    Int Orthod; 2011 Jun; 9(2):224-34. PubMed ID: 21498140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Facial attractiveness of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate and of controls assessed by laypersons and professionals.
    Eichenberger M; Staudt CB; Pandis N; Gnoinski W; Eliades T
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Jun; 36(3):284-9. PubMed ID: 23832974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Esthetic preferences of orthodontists, oral surgeons, and laypersons for Persian facial profiles.
    Imani MM; Sanei E; Niaki EA; Shahroudi AS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Sep; 154(3):412-420. PubMed ID: 30173845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An appraisal of three methods of rating facial deformity in patients with repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Al-Omari I; Millett DT; Ayoub A; Bock M; Ray A; Dunaway D; Crampin L
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2003 Sep; 40(5):530-7. PubMed ID: 12943433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Orthodontic treatment needs and indications assessed with IONT].
    Grzywacz I
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2004; 50(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 16871750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Is there a difference in judgement of facial appearance depending on ethnic background? Photographic evaluation of facial appearance in orthognathic surgery.
    Bengtsson M; Loh JSP; Wall G; Becktor JP; Rasmusson L
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Sep; 58(7):812-818. PubMed ID: 32409131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reproducibility of the pink esthetic score--rating soft tissue esthetics around single-implant restorations with regard to dental observer specialization.
    Gehrke P; Lobert M; Dhom G
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(6):375-84; discussion 385. PubMed ID: 19120783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [The effect of orthodontic treatment on facial profile of patients with Class II division 1 malocclusions].
    Yi S; Lin XP; Hu RD; Ni ZY
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2012 Feb; 21(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 22431053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The perception of dental aesthetics and orthodontic treatment need by 10- to 11-year-old children.
    Singh V; Hamdan A; Rock P
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Oct; 34(5):646-51. PubMed ID: 21808073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.