These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7781718)

  • 41. Dental aesthetics perception and eating behavior in adolescence.
    Settineri S; Rizzo A; Ottanà A; Liotta M; Mento C
    Int J Adolesc Med Health; 2015 Aug; 27(3):311-7. PubMed ID: 25720040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Standardized standing pelvis-to-floor photographs for the assessment of lower-extremity alignment.
    Sheehy L; Cooke TD; McLean L; Culham E
    Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2015 Mar; 23(3):379-82. PubMed ID: 25528105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Maxillary arch width and buccal corridor changes with orthodontic treatment. Part 2: attractiveness of the frontal facial smile in extraction and nonextraction outcomes.
    Meyer AH; Woods MG; Manton DJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):296-304. PubMed ID: 24582021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The importance of using the entire face to assess facial profile attractiveness.
    Tauk A; Bassil-Nassif N; Mouhanna-Fattal C; Bouserhal J
    Int Orthod; 2016 Mar; 14(1):65-79. PubMed ID: 26867684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Facial Impairment Scales for Clefts.
    Tobiasen JM; Hiebert JM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1994 Jan; 93(1):31-41; discussion 42-3. PubMed ID: 8278483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Long-term function of single-implant restorations: a 17- to 19-year follow-up study on implant infraposition related to the shape of the face and patients' satisfaction.
    Andersson B; Bergenblock S; Fürst B; Jemt T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Aug; 15(4):471-80. PubMed ID: 21834859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Orthodontists' and laypersons' aesthetic assessment of Class III subjects referred for orthognathic surgery.
    Fabré M; Mossaz C; Christou P; Kiliaridis S
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 19395371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The Influence of Clinical Experience and Photographic Presentation on Age Assessment of Women.
    Nielsen BR; Linneberg A; Christensen K; Forman JL; Schwarz P
    Gerontology; 2016; 62(2):191-9. PubMed ID: 26382945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Significance of the soft tissue profile on facial esthetics.
    Spyropoulos MN; Halazonetis DJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):464-71. PubMed ID: 11343017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Development and reproducibility of a 3D stereophotogrammetric reference frame for facial soft tissue growth of babies and young children with and without orofacial clefts.
    Brons S; van Beusichem ME; Maal TJ; Plooij JM; Bronkhorst EM; Bergé SJ; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 42(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 22920646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Orthodontic treatment planning: do orthodontists treat to cephalometric norms?
    Al-Balkhi KM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2003 Nov; 4(4):12-27. PubMed ID: 14625592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Objective method for evaluating orthodontic treatment from the lay perspective: An eye-tracking study.
    Wang X; Cai B; Cao Y; Zhou C; Yang L; Liu R; Long X; Wang W; Gao D; Bao B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Oct; 150(4):601-610. PubMed ID: 27692417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Development of scales of severity of facial cleft impairment.
    Tobiasen JM; Hiebert JM; Boraz RA
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1991 Oct; 28(4):419-24. PubMed ID: 1742313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Influence of sense of coherence on adolescents' self-perceived dental aesthetics; a cross-sectional study.
    da Costa AC; Rodrigues FS; da Fonte PP; Rosenblatt A; Innes NPT; Heimer MV
    BMC Oral Health; 2017 Aug; 17(1):117. PubMed ID: 28818059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison of perceptions on the dental aesthetics of different malocclusions between orthodontists and schoolchildren.
    Zheng B; Muhammed FK; An N; Bai L; Liu F; Zheng Y; Liu Y
    Saudi Med J; 2018 Sep; 39(9):946-950. PubMed ID: 30251740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.
    Maple JR; Vig KW; Beck FM; Larsen PE; Shanker S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):690-6; quiz 801. PubMed ID: 16360907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Reproducibility of the implant crown aesthetic index--rating aesthetics of single-implant crowns and adjacent soft tissues with regard to observer dental specialization.
    Gehrke P; Degidi M; Lulay-Saad Z; Dhom G
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):201-13. PubMed ID: 18657148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Photographic assessment of burn wounds: a simple strategy in a resource-poor setting.
    Kiser M; Beijer G; Mjuweni S; Muyco A; Cairns B; Charles A
    Burns; 2013 Feb; 39(1):155-61. PubMed ID: 22647494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A photographic scale for the evaluation of facial skin aging in Indian women.
    Bernois A; Huber A; Derome C; Drouault Y; de Quéral D; Schnebert S; Perrier E; Heusèle C
    Eur J Dermatol; 2011; 21(5):700-4. PubMed ID: 21719407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Perception of facial profile attractiveness of a brown subject displaying different degrees of lip projection or retrusion, in the city of Salvador/Bahia.
    Carneiro EN; Pithon MM; Machado AW; Braga E
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2018; 23(2):62-67. PubMed ID: 29898159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.