186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7781720)
1. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of enamel surface following five composite removal methods after bracket debonding.
Hong YH; Lew KK
Eur J Orthod; 1995 Apr; 17(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 7781720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding: A Comparative Study using Three Different Burs.
Garg R; Dixit P; Khosla T; Gupta P; Kalra H; Kumar P
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 May; 19(5):521-526. PubMed ID: 29807961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Enamel surface morphology after bracket debonding.
Osorio R; Toledano M; García-Godoy F
ASDC J Dent Child; 1998; 65(5):313-7, 354. PubMed ID: 9795734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of enamel surface roughness after orthodontic bracket debonding with atomic force microscopy.
Mohebi S; Shafiee HA; Ameli N
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Mar; 151(3):521-527. PubMed ID: 28257737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Enamel loss and adhesive remnants following bracket removal and various clean-up procedures in vitro.
Ryf S; Flury S; Palaniappan S; Lussi A; van Meerbeek B; Zimmerli B
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 21228118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stereomicroscope analysis of enamel surface after orthodontic bracket debonding.
Miksić M; Slaj M; Mestrović S
Coll Antropol; 2003; 27 Suppl 2():83-9. PubMed ID: 12971175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Enamel surface roughness following debonding using two resin grinding methods.
Eliades T; Gioka C; Eliades G; Makou M
Eur J Orthod; 2004 Jun; 26(3):333-8. PubMed ID: 15222720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Enamel surface evaluation after bracket debonding and different resin removal methods.
Vidor MM; Felix RP; Marchioro EM; Hahn L
Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 25992989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Enamel surface roughness after debonding.
Karan S; Kircelli BH; Tasdelen B
Angle Orthod; 2010 Nov; 80(6):1081-8. PubMed ID: 20677958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of different debonding techniques on the enamel surface: an in vitro qualitative study.
Zarrinnia K; Eid NM; Kehoe MJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Sep; 108(3):284-93. PubMed ID: 7661146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Orthodontic bracket removal using conventional and ultrasonic debonding techniques, enamel loss, and time requirements.
Krell KV; Courey JM; Bishara SE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Mar; 103(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 8456784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of enamel roughness after orthodontic debonding and clean-up procedures using zirconia, tungsten carbide, and white stone burs: an in vitro study.
Thawaba AA; Albelasy NF; Elsherbini AM; Hafez AM
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jul; 23(1):478. PubMed ID: 37443027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of various debonding and adhesive clearance methods on enamel surface: an in vitro study.
Fan XC; Chen L; Huang XF
BMC Oral Health; 2017 Feb; 17(1):58. PubMed ID: 28241812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of different splint removal techniques on the surface roughness of human enamel: a three-dimensional optical profilometry analysis.
Cehreli ZC; Lakshmipathy M; Yazici R
Dent Traumatol; 2008 Apr; 24(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 18352920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ER: YAG laser for composite removal after bracket debonding: a qualitative SEM analysis.
Almeida HC; Vedovello Filho M; Vedovello SA; Young AA; Ramirez-Yañez GO
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2009; 20(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 19438107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Comparative Evaluation of Enamel Surface Roughness of Two Different Bonding Adhesives After Debonding With Atomic Force Microscopy.
Doddavarapu S; K B; Singaraju GS; Yamini Priyanka JS; Vivek Reddy G; Mandava P
Cureus; 2022 Nov; 14(11):e31661. PubMed ID: 36420047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro evaluation of enamel surface roughness and morphology after orthodontic debonding: Traditional cleanup systems versus polymer bur.
Soares Tenório KC; Neupmann Feres MF; Tanaka CJ; Augusto MKM; Rodrigues JA; Pereira da Silva HD; Arana-Chavez VE; Roscoe MG
Int Orthod; 2020 Sep; 18(3):546-554. PubMed ID: 32493624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative evaluation of three methods of adhesive remnant removal after orthodontic bracket debonding.
Yassaei S; Joshan N; Abdolahy S; Abadi AHR
Dental Press J Orthod; 2023; 27(6):e2220352. PubMed ID: 36995841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of debonding of orthodontic brackets on topography and surface roughness of composite restorations.
Moradi M; Hormozi E; Shamohammadi M; Rakhshan V
Int Orthod; 2018 Dec; 16(4):623-637. PubMed ID: 30343063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Enamel preservation during composite removal after orthodontic debonding comparing hydroabrasion with rotary instruments.
Bosco E; Potrubacz MI; Arrizza L; Chimenti C; Tepedino M
Dent Mater J; 2020 Jun; 39(3):367-374. PubMed ID: 31827057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
