These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7781722)

  • 1. Long-term evaluation after chincap treatment.
    Uner O; Yüksel S; Uçüncü N
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Apr; 17(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 7781722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term effects of chincap therapy on skeletal profile in mandibular prognathism.
    Sugawara J; Asano T; Endo N; Mitani H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Aug; 98(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 2378318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term effect of the chincap on hard and soft tissues.
    Abu Alhaija ES; Richardson A
    Eur J Orthod; 1999 Jun; 21(3):291-8. PubMed ID: 10407538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of chincap force on the timing and amount of mandibular growth associated with anterior reversed occlusion (Class III malocclusion) during puberty.
    Mitani H; Fukazawa H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1986 Dec; 90(6):454-63. PubMed ID: 3466526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of chincap and maxillary protraction appliances in the treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusions.
    Uçüncü N; Uçem TT; Yüksel S
    Eur J Orthod; 2000 Feb; 22(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 10721244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Long-term results of skeletal profile changes occurring during chincap therapy in male Japanese skeletal Class III cases].
    Tsuchikawa T; Sugawara J; Nakamura H; Mitani H
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1985 Dec; 44(4):644-59. PubMed ID: 3869183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Treatment effects of simple fixed appliance and reverse headgear in correction of anterior crossbites.
    Gu Y; Rabie AB; Hägg U
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):691-9. PubMed ID: 10842112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of treatment with a combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in skeletal Class III patients with different vertical skeletal morphologies.
    Yoshida I; Shoji T; Mizoguchi I
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 17218717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Early treatment of Class III incisor relationship using the chincap appliance.
    Allen RA; Connolly IH; Richardson A
    Eur J Orthod; 1993 Oct; 15(5):371-6. PubMed ID: 8223971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Treatment and posttreatment effects of a facial mask combined with a bite-block appliance in Class III malocclusion.
    Cozza P; Baccetti T; Mucedero M; Pavoni C; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 20816299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Treatment effect of combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in severe skeletal Class III cases.
    Ishii H; Morita S; Takeuchi Y; Nakamura S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Oct; 92(4):304-12. PubMed ID: 3477949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [A statistical study of the effect of a chincap combined with a maxillary protraction appliance to a case of reversed occlusion].
    Ishii H; Matsubara S; Kitano T; Morita S; Ogasawara J; Sato M
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1985 Sep; 44(3):556-67. PubMed ID: 3866813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of chin cup therapy on the mandible: a longitudinal study.
    Wendell PD; Nanda R; Sakamoto T; Nakamura S
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Apr; 87(4):265-74. PubMed ID: 3857003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Class III malocclusion: the post-retention findings following a non-extraction treatment approach.
    Battagel JM; Orton HS
    Eur J Orthod; 1993 Feb; 15(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 8436196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mandibular cervical headgear in orthopedic and orthodontic treatment of Class III cases.
    Rey D; Aristizabal JF; Oberti G; Angel D
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 16779976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Facial growth of skeletal Class III malocclusion and the effects, limitations, and long-term dentofacial adaptations to chincap therapy.
    Sugawara J; Mitani H
    Semin Orthod; 1997 Dec; 3(4):244-54. PubMed ID: 9573886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maxillary protraction and chincap appliance treatment effects and long-term changes in skeletal class III patients.
    Yoshida I; Ishii H; Yamaguchi N; Mizoguchi I
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Dec; 69(6):543-52. PubMed ID: 10593446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Early application of chincap therapy to skeletal Class III malocclusion.
    Mitani H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Jun; 121(6):584-5. PubMed ID: 12080307
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Experimental study on the effect of the orthopedic appliance to skeletal Class III cases with underdeveloped nasomaxillary complex (author's transl)].
    Ishii H
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1979; 38(2):187-209. PubMed ID: 121311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. FIXED OR REMOVABLE APPLIANCE FOR EARLY ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT OF FUNCTIONAL ANTERIOR CROSSBITE.
    Wiedel AP
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2015; (238):10-72. PubMed ID: 26939312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.