These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7782531)

  • 1. Influence of light intensity on two restorative systems.
    Unterbrink GL; Muessner R
    J Dent; 1995 Jun; 23(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 7782531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison between a plasma arc light source and conventional halogen curing units regarding flexural strength, modulus, and hardness of photoactivated resin composites.
    Hofmann N; Hugo B; Schubert K; Klaiber B
    Clin Oral Investig; 2000 Sep; 4(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 11000318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Resin polymerization problems--are they caused by resin curing lights, resin formulations, or both?
    Christensen RP; Palmer TM; Ploeger BJ; Yost MP
    Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl; 1999; (25):S42-54; quiz S74. PubMed ID: 11908396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of interfacial bond quality on the direction of polymerization shrinkage flow in resin composite restorations.
    Cho BH; Dickens SH; Bae JH; Chang CG; Son HH; Um CM
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 12022463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of shade and storage time on the flexural strength, flexural modulus, and hardness of composites used for indirect restorations.
    Cesar PF; Miranda WG; Braga RR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 11552166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Physical properties and gap formation of light-cured composites with and without 'softstart-polymerization'.
    Mehl A; Hickel R; Kunzelmann KH
    J Dent; 1997; 25(3-4):321-30. PubMed ID: 9175364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do dental composites always shrink toward the light?
    Versluis A; Tantbirojn D; Douglas WH
    J Dent Res; 1998 Jun; 77(6):1435-45. PubMed ID: 9649172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methacrylate- and silorane-based composite restorations: hardness, depth of cure and interfacial gap formation as a function of the energy dose.
    D'Alpino PH; Bechtold J; dos Santos PJ; Alonso RC; Di Hipólito V; Silikas N; Rodrigues FP
    Dent Mater; 2011 Nov; 27(11):1162-9. PubMed ID: 21925724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of mechanical properties of resin composites on the efficacy of the dentin bonding system.
    Hasegawa T; Itoh K; Koike T; Yukitani W; Hisamitsu H; Wakumoto S; Fujishima A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(6):323-30. PubMed ID: 10823080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Variable polymerisation shrinkage and the interfacial micropermeability of a dentin bonding system.
    Griffiths BM; Naasan M; Sherriff M; Watson TF
    J Adhes Dent; 1999; 1(2):119-31. PubMed ID: 11725677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of micro-tensile bond strengths of composite materials in comparison to their polymerization shrinkage.
    Ilie N; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
    Dent Mater; 2006 Jul; 22(7):593-601. PubMed ID: 16289723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Guidance of shrinkage vectors vs irradiation at reduced intensity for improving marginal seal of class V resin-based composite restorations in vitro.
    Hofmann N; Hiltl O; Hugo B; Klaiber B
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):510-5. PubMed ID: 12216571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without "softstart-polymerization".
    Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Märkl A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 11203787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of soft-start irradiation on the depth of cure and marginal adaptation to dentin.
    Hasegawa T; Itoh K; Yukitani W; Wakumoto S; Hisamitsu H
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(4):389-95. PubMed ID: 11504439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Curing units' ability to cure restorative composites and dual-cured composite cements under composite overlay.
    Park SH; Kim SS; Cho YS; Lee CK; Noh BD
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(6):627-35. PubMed ID: 15646217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of resin composite polymerization techniques on microleakage and microhardness.
    Amaral CM; de Castro AK; Pimenta LA; Ambrosano GM
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Oct; 33(9):685-9. PubMed ID: 12666894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of photo-activation versus chemical or dual-curing of resin-based luting cements regarding flexural strength, modulus and surface hardness.
    Hofmann N; Papsthart G; Hugo B; Klaiber B
    J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Nov; 28(11):1022-8. PubMed ID: 11722718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Depth of cure and microleakage with high-intensity and ramped resin-based composite curing lights.
    Jain P; Pershing A
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Sep; 134(9):1215-23. PubMed ID: 14528993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Directed polymerization shrinkage versus a horizontal incremental filling technique: interfacial adaptation in vivo in Class II cavities.
    van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P; Waern R
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 10388370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of new light curing units and bonding agents on the microleakage of Class V composite resin restorations.
    Pradelle-Plasse N; Besnault C; Souad N; Colon P
    Am J Dent; 2003 Dec; 16(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 15002957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.