BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 778258)

  • 21. Inefficiency of upward displacement operating theatre ventilation.
    Friberg B; Friberg S; Burman LG; Lundholm R; Ostensson R
    J Hosp Infect; 1996 Aug; 33(4):263-72. PubMed ID: 8999051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The surgeon's garb.
    Ritter MA; Eitzen HE; Hart JB; French ML
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1980; (153):204-9. PubMed ID: 7449218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A randomised prospective comparison of Rotecno versus new Gore occlusive surgical gowns using bacterial air counts in ultraclean air.
    Gulihar A; Taub NA; Taylor GJ
    J Hosp Infect; 2009 Sep; 73(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 19646783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Occlusive clothing and ultraviolet radiation in hip surgery.
    Sanzén L; Carlsson AS; Walder M
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1989 Dec; 60(6):664-7. PubMed ID: 2696322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reduction of contamination at total hip replacement by special working clothes.
    Blomgren G; Hoborn J; Nyström B
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1990 Nov; 72(6):985-7. PubMed ID: 2246302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Non-woven, disposable theatre gowns for 'high-risk' surgery.
    Jones DR; Harris R; Wilson K
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1993 May; 75(3):154-6. PubMed ID: 8323206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Direct measurement of bacterial penetration through surgical gowns: a new method.
    Lankester BJ; Bartlett GE; Garneti N; Blom AW; Bowker KE; Bannister GC
    J Hosp Infect; 2002 Apr; 50(4):281-5. PubMed ID: 12014901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bacterial sedimentation during cardiac surgery reduced by disposable clothing.
    Lippert S; Gutschik E
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992; 26(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 1529303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Air contamination during hip and knee arthroplasties. Horizontal laminar flow randomized vs. conventional ventilation.
    Ahl T; Dalén N; Jörbeck H; Hoborn J
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1995 Feb; 66(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 7863761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of laundering on the barrier properties of reusable surgical gown fabrics.
    Leonas KK
    Am J Infect Control; 1998 Oct; 26(5):495-501. PubMed ID: 9795678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The relationship of selected fabric characteristics and the barrier effectiveness of surgical gown fabrics.
    Leonas KK; Jinkins RS
    Am J Infect Control; 1997 Feb; 25(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 9057939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Microbial penetration of surgical gown materials.
    Schwartz JT; Saunders DE
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1980 Apr; 150(4):507-12. PubMed ID: 7361235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bacterial contamination of air and surgical wounds during joint replacement operations. Comparison of two different types of staff clothing.
    Scheibel JH; Jensen I; Pedersen S
    J Hosp Infect; 1991 Nov; 19(3):167-74. PubMed ID: 1685504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The conventionally ventilated operating theatre and air contamination control during cardiac surgery--bacteriological and particulate matter control garment options for low level contamination.
    Verkkala K; Eklund A; Ojajärvi J; Tiittanen L; Hoborn J; Mäkelä P
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1998 Aug; 14(2):206-10. PubMed ID: 9755009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dispersal of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis by staff in an operating suite for thoracic and cardiovascular surgery: relation to skin carriage and clothing.
    Tammelin A; Domicel P; Hambraeus A; Ståhle E
    J Hosp Infect; 2000 Feb; 44(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 10662562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. User experience of wearing comfort of reusable versus disposable surgical gowns and environmental perspectives: A cross-sectional survey.
    van Nieuwenhuizen KE; Friedericy HJ; van der Linden S; Jansen FW; van der Eijk AC
    BJOG; 2024 Apr; 131(5):709-715. PubMed ID: 37806784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Surgical area contamination--comparable bacterial counts using disposable head and mask and helmet aspirator system, but dramatic increase upon omission of head-gear: an experimental study in horizontal laminar air-flow.
    Friberg B; Friberg S; Ostensson R; Burman LG
    J Hosp Infect; 2001 Feb; 47(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 11170774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Barrier efficiency of surgical gowns. Are we really protected from our patients' pathogens?
    Smith JW; Nichols RL
    Arch Surg; 1991 Jun; 126(6):756-63. PubMed ID: 2039364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The evaluation of fabrics in relation to their use as protective garments in nursing and surgery. II. Dispersal of skin organisms in a test chamber.
    Lidwell OM; Mackintosh CA; Towers AG
    J Hyg (Lond); 1978 Dec; 81(3):453-69. PubMed ID: 731025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Gown-glove Interface Is a Source of Contamination: A Comparative Study.
    Fraser JF; Young SW; Valentine KA; Probst NE; Spangehl MJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jul; 473(7):2291-7. PubMed ID: 25488405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.