172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7783097)
1. Accuracy of an oscillometric automatic blood pressure device: the Omron HEM403C.
Walma EP; van Dooren C; van der Does E; Prins A; Mulder P; Hoes AW
J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Mar; 9(3):169-74. PubMed ID: 7783097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Random zero sphygmomanometer versus automatic oscillometric blood pressure monitor; is either the instrument of choice?
Goonasekera CD; Dillon MJ
J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Nov; 9(11):885-9. PubMed ID: 8583467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) upper-arm blood pressure measuring device according to the International Protocol in adults and obese adults.
Altunkan S; Ilman N; Kayatürk N; Altunkan E
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 17625394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer underestimate blood pressure, and by how much?
Mackie A; Whincup P; McKinnon M
J Hum Hypertens; 1995 May; 9(5):337-43. PubMed ID: 7623370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of the Omron HEM 706 portable monitor for home measurement of blood pressure.
Foster C; McKinlay S; Cruickshank JM; Coats AJ
J Hum Hypertens; 1994 Sep; 8(9):661-4. PubMed ID: 7807495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of two automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension: the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) and the Omron R7 (HEM 637-IT).
Topouchian JA; El Assaad MA; Orobinskaia LV; El Feghali RN; Asmar RG
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Jun; 11(3):165-71. PubMed ID: 16702826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of the Omron M7 (HEM-780-E) oscillometric blood pressure monitoring device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol.
Coleman A; Steel S; Freeman P; de Greeff A; Shennan A
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Feb; 13(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 18199924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the accuracy of the Omron HEM-907 blood pressure device.
Gurpreet K; Tee GH; Karuthan C
Med J Malaysia; 2008 Aug; 63(3):239-43. PubMed ID: 19248698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of blood pressure measurements between an automated oscillometric device and a Hawksley random-zero sphygmomanometer in the northern Sweden MONICA study.
Eriksson M; Carlberg B; Jansson JH
Blood Press Monit; 2012 Aug; 17(4):164-70. PubMed ID: 22781634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of the Omron M5-I, R5-I and HEM-907 automated blood pressure monitors in elderly individuals according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
Omboni S; Riva I; Giglio A; Caldara G; Groppelli A; Parati G
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):233-42. PubMed ID: 17625396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical validation of an automatic device measuring blood pressure in the fingers.
Arosio E; Zannoni M
Panminerva Med; 1999 Jun; 41(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 10479914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of noninvasive oscillometric and intra-arterial blood pressure measurements in hyperacute stroke.
Manios E; Vemmos K; Tsivgoulis G; Barlas G; Koroboki E; Spengos K; Zakopoulos N
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):149-56. PubMed ID: 17496464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of the Microlife Watch BP Office professional device for office blood pressure measurement according to the International protocol.
Stergiou GS; Tzamouranis D; Protogerou A; Nasothimiou E; Kapralos C
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Oct; 13(5):299-303. PubMed ID: 18799957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of the OMRON M7 (HEM-780-E) blood pressure measuring device in a population requiring large cuff use according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
El Feghali RN; Topouchian JA; Pannier BM; El Assaad HA; Asmar RG;
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 17496467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy and 'range of uncertainty' of oscillometric blood pressure monitors around the upper arm and the wrist.
Dieterle T; Battegay E; Bucheli B; Martina B
Blood Press Monit; 1998; 3(6):339-46. PubMed ID: 10212375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Arm position and blood pressure: a risk factor for hypertension?
Mourad A; Carney S; Gillies A; Jones B; Nanra R; Trevillian P
J Hum Hypertens; 2003 Jun; 17(6):389-95. PubMed ID: 12764401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Disagreement of the two oscillometric blood pressure measurement devices, Datascope Accutorr Plus and Omron HEM-705CP II, and bidirectional conversion of blood pressure values.
Adler C; Ellert U; Neuhauser HK
Blood Press Monit; 2014 Apr; 19(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 24583967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation between objective automatic and auscultatory mercury manometer blood pressure measurements.
Gonzalez Biosca MD; Fernandez-Cruz A; Mizushima S; Yamori Y
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol; 1990; 16 Suppl 8():S26-7. PubMed ID: 1706023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The trained observer better predicts daytime ABPM diastolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients than does an automated (Omron) device.
Graves JW; Grossardt BR; Gullerud RE; Bailey KR; Feldstein J
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 16534405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of the shapes of the oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes and their characteristic ratios on the differences between auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure measurements.
Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 17890968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
