These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7783520)

  • 1. [SVIR, the national intensive care registry. An important evaluation of expensive care].
    Karling M; Bäcklund U; Nolin T; Wernerman J; Lundberg D; Larsson A; Sandstedt S; Nilsson A; Mälstam J
    Lakartidningen; 1995 Jun; 92(24):2492-4. PubMed ID: 7783520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Application of scoring systems for quality assurance and cost estimation in intensive care medicine].
    Vesely H; Gregor T
    Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 1998 Jan; 33(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 9530485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Risk-adjusted mortality in intensive care. Self-analysis is needed to draw the right conclusions from the national registry].
    Engerström L; Walther S; Svensson R
    Lakartidningen; 2012 Jun 5-19; 109(23-24):1160-3. PubMed ID: 22834208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are scoring systems adequate indicators for quality and performance of the ICU?
    Rowan K
    Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 1998 Jan; 33(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 9530484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Intensive care medicine in the Netherlands, 1997-2001. I. Patient population and treatment outcome].
    de Jonge E; Bosman RJ; van der Voort PH; Korsten HH; Scheffer GJ; de Keizer NF
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 May; 147(21):1013-7. PubMed ID: 12811973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Apache II score and prognosis of intensive care patients after trauma--results of a quality assurance study of 939 patients].
    Lefering R; Dicke S; Böttcher B; Neugebauer E
    Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd; 1997; 114():1387-9. PubMed ID: 9574437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The performance of intensive care services].
    Le Gall JR
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 2000; 184(8):1653-63; discussion 1664. PubMed ID: 11471386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The national health care registry had not found its form. Scrutiny shows the value for quality control].
    Garpenby P; Carlsson P
    Lakartidningen; 1994 Jun; 91(25):2509-11. PubMed ID: 8046964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Clinical database for intensive care patients].
    Rønholm E; Christensen S; Andersen JS; Jensen RH; Sørensen HT
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2007 Feb; 169(8):724-7. PubMed ID: 17313928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality assurance in an adult intensive care unit, Eastern region, Saudi Arabia.
    Iqbal M; Rehmani R; Venter J; Alaithan AM
    Saudi Med J; 2007 Mar; 28(3):408-11. PubMed ID: 17334470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Principles of quality control in the high-risk patient.
    Moreno R
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl; 1997; 111():9-11. PubMed ID: 9420935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Readmission to surgical intensive care increases severity-adjusted patient mortality.
    Alban RF; Nisim AA; Ho J; Nishi GK; Shabot MM
    J Trauma; 2006 May; 60(5):1027-31. PubMed ID: 16688065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The acute physiology and chronic health evaluation III outcome prediction in patients admitted to the intensive care unit after pneumonectomy.
    Keegan MT; Harrison BA; Brown DR; Whalen FX; Cassivi SD; Afessa B
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2007 Dec; 21(6):832-7. PubMed ID: 18068061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcome and quality of life of patients with acute pancreatitis requiring intensive care.
    Soran A; Chelluri L; Lee KK; Tisherman SA
    J Surg Res; 2000 Jun; 91(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 10816356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [A national registry on diabetes--cooperation is necessary for quality].
    Falkenberg M; Wernerson M
    Lakartidningen; 1996 Apr; 93(14):1318. PubMed ID: 8656857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Methods for cost-effectiveness evaluation of intensive care].
    Heslet L; Andersen JS; Keiding H
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2007 Feb; 169(8):721-4. PubMed ID: 17313927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Re-evaluation of established risk scores by measurement of nucleated red blood cells in blood of surgical intensive care patients.
    Stachon A; Becker A; Kempf R; Holland-Letz T; Friese J; Krieg M
    J Trauma; 2008 Sep; 65(3):666-73. PubMed ID: 18784582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) scoring in the Medical Intensive Care Unit, National University Hospital, Singapore.
    Lee KH; Hui KP; Lim TK; Tan WC
    Singapore Med J; 1993 Feb; 34(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 8266127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [A national registry on diabetes does not improve the quality of diabetic care].
    Olsson B; Persson L
    Lakartidningen; 1996 Jan; 93(4):235. PubMed ID: 8569342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Limitations of score-based daily outcome predictions in the individual intensive care patient. An example of the RIAHDH algorithm.
    Lefering R; Wolfrum B; Wauer H; Neugebauer EA
    Inflamm Res; 2004 Aug; 53 Suppl 2():S169-74. PubMed ID: 15338071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.