These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7783572)

  • 1. The covariance decomposition of the probability score and its use in evaluating prognostic estimates. SUPPORT Investigators.
    Arkes HR; Dawson NV; Speroff T; Harrell FE; Alzola C; Phillips R; Desbiens N; Oye RK; Knaus W; Connors AF
    Med Decis Making; 1995; 15(2):120-31. PubMed ID: 7783572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prevalence of and Factors Related to Discordance About Prognosis Between Physicians and Surrogate Decision Makers of Critically Ill Patients.
    White DB; Ernecoff N; Buddadhumaruk P; Hong S; Weissfeld L; Curtis JR; Luce JM; Lo B
    JAMA; 2016 May; 315(19):2086-94. PubMed ID: 27187301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Double Conjunction Fallacies in Physicians' Probability Judgment.
    Crupi V; Elia F; Aprà F; Tentori K
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Aug; 38(6):756-760. PubMed ID: 29978726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Overestimation of test effects in clinical judgment.
    Lyman GH; Balducci L
    J Cancer Educ; 1993; 8(4):297-307. PubMed ID: 8186081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What difference do two days make? The inertia of physicians' sequential prognostic judgments for critically ill patients.
    Poses RM; Bekes C; Copare FJ; Scott WE
    Med Decis Making; 1990; 10(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 2325526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Probability judgement in medicine: discounting unspecified possibilities.
    Redelmeier DA; Koehler DJ; Liberman V; Tversky A
    Med Decis Making; 1995; 15(3):227-30. PubMed ID: 7564936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating physicians' probabilistic judgments.
    Poses RM; Cebul RD; Centor RM
    Med Decis Making; 1988; 8(4):233-40. PubMed ID: 3054395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing physicians' estimates of the probability of coronary artery disease: the influence of patient characteristics.
    Schulman KA; Escarce JJ; Eisenberg JM; Hershey JC; Young MJ; McCarthy DM; Williams SV
    Med Decis Making; 1992; 12(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 1306640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does choosing a treatment depend on making a diagnosis? US and French physicians' decision making about acute otitis media.
    Sorum PC; Stewart TR; Mullet E; González-Vallejo C; Shim J; Chasseigne G; Sastre MT; Grenier B
    Med Decis Making; 2002; 22(5):394-402. PubMed ID: 12365481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Availability, wishful thinking, and physicians' diagnostic judgments for patients with suspected bacteremia.
    Poses RM; Anthony M
    Med Decis Making; 1991; 11(3):159-68. PubMed ID: 1881270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How well can physicians estimate mortality in a medical intensive care unit?
    McClish DK; Powell SH
    Med Decis Making; 1989; 9(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 2747449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Information order and outcome framing: an assesment of judgment bias in a naturalistic decision-making context.
    Perrin BM; Barnett BJ; Walrath L; Grossman JD
    Hum Factors; 2001; 43(2):227-38. PubMed ID: 11592664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characterizing physicians' perceptions of ambiguity.
    Curley SP; Young MJ; Yates JF
    Med Decis Making; 1989; 9(2):116-24. PubMed ID: 2747448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Structured Clinical Decision Aids Are Seldom Compared With Subjective Physician Judgment, and Are Seldom Superior.
    Schriger DL; Elder JW; Cooper RJ
    Ann Emerg Med; 2017 Sep; 70(3):338-344.e3. PubMed ID: 28238497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Value-induced bias in medical decision making.
    Levy AG; Hershey JC
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(2):269-76. PubMed ID: 18349431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. FRAMING EFFECTS ON PHYSICIANS' JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING.
    Bui TC; Krieger HA; Blumenthal-Barby JS
    Psychol Rep; 2015 Oct; 117(2):508-22. PubMed ID: 26444837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of clinical judgment analysis to explain regional variations in physicians' accuracies in diagnosing pneumonia.
    Tape TG; Heckerling PS; Ornato JP; Wigton RS
    Med Decis Making; 1991; 11(3):189-97. PubMed ID: 1881275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two studies of good clinical judgment.
    Christensen-Szalanski JJ; Diehr PH; Bushyhead JB; Wood RW
    Med Decis Making; 1982; 2(3):275-83. PubMed ID: 6133204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intuitive symbolic magnitude judgments and decision making under risk in adults.
    Patalano AL; Zax A; Williams K; Mathias L; Cordes S; Barth H
    Cogn Psychol; 2020 May; 118():101273. PubMed ID: 32028073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How convergence of research paradigms can improve research on diagnostic judgment.
    Hammond KR
    Med Decis Making; 1996; 16(3):281-7. PubMed ID: 8818127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.