318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7784021)
21. Preoperative staging of cervical carcinoma with MR imaging: a reappraisal of diagnostic accuracy and pitfalls.
Sheu MH; Chang CY; Wang JH; Yen MS
Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(9):1828-33. PubMed ID: 11511909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. (18)F-FDG PET/CT can correct the clinical stages and predict pathological parameters before operation in cervical cancer.
Yang Z; Xu W; Ma Y; Liu K; Li Y; Wang D
Eur J Radiol; 2016 May; 85(5):877-84. PubMed ID: 27130046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Magnetic Resonance Imaging for local preoperative staging in endometrial cancer: Nantes local experience].
Coussoou C; Laigle-Quérat V; Loussouarn D; Vaucel E; Frampas E
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2020 Apr; 48(4):374-383. PubMed ID: 32058046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting pelvic lymph-node metastases in patients with early-stage uterine cervical cancer: comparison with MRI findings.
Lv K; Guo HM; Lu YJ; Wu ZX; Zhang K; Han JK
Nucl Med Commun; 2014 Dec; 35(12):1204-11. PubMed ID: 25222911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Early invasive cervical cancer: CT and MR imaging in preoperative evaluation - ACRIN/GOG comparative study of diagnostic performance and interobserver variability.
Hricak H; Gatsonis C; Coakley FV; Snyder B; Reinhold C; Schwartz LH; Woodward PJ; Pannu HK; Amendola M; Mitchell DG
Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):491-8. PubMed ID: 17940305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Invasive carcinoma of the cervix uteri (Stage IB-IIB). Comparison of CT and MR for the assessment of the parametrium].
Sironi S; Zanello A; Rodighiero MG; Vanzulli A; Taccagni GL; Belloni C; Del Maschio A
Radiol Med; 1991 May; 81(5):671-7. PubMed ID: 2057595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Transvaginal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of presence, size and extent of invasive cervical cancer.
Testa AC; Ludovisi M; Manfredi R; Zannoni G; Gui B; Basso D; Di Legge A; Licameli A; Di Bidino R; Scambia G; Ferrandina G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Sep; 34(3):335-44. PubMed ID: 19705403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Pre-operative staging of cervical cancer: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) with histologic results.
Oellinger JJ; Blohmer JU; Michniewicz K; Siewert C; Wust P; Gutberlet M; Lichtenegger W; Felix R
Zentralbl Gynakol; 2000; 122(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 10721187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Early invasive cervical cancer: tumor delineation by magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and clinical examination, verified by pathologic results, in the ACRIN 6651/GOG 183 Intergroup Study.
Mitchell DG; Snyder B; Coakley F; Reinhold C; Thomas G; Amendola M; Schwartz LH; Woodward P; Pannu H; Hricak H
J Clin Oncol; 2006 Dec; 24(36):5687-94. PubMed ID: 17179104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Preoperative staging of cervical carcinoma: phased array coil fast spin-echo versus body coil spin-echo T2-weighted MR imaging.
Yu KK; Hricak H; Subak LL; Zaloudek CJ; Powell CB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Sep; 171(3):707-11. PubMed ID: 9725301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Role of X-ray CT and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of gynecological malignant tumor].
Suzuki M
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Aug; 41(8):942-52. PubMed ID: 2809344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison between 3-T magnetic resonance imaging and multi-detector row computed tomography for the preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer.
Kim CK; Kim SH; Choi D; Kim MJ; Chun HK; Lee SJ; Lee JM
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(6):853-9. PubMed ID: 18043346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Role of imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer: results of the intergroup study American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6651-Gynecologic Oncology Group 183.
Hricak H; Gatsonis C; Chi DS; Amendola MA; Brandt K; Schwartz LH; Koelliker S; Siegelman ES; Brown JJ; McGhee RB; Iyer R; Vitellas KM; Snyder B; Long HJ; Fiorica JV; Mitchell DG; ;
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Dec; 23(36):9329-37. PubMed ID: 16361632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis and deep stromal invasion in women with invasive cervical cancer: prospective multicenter study using 2D and 3D ultrasound.
Pálsdóttir K; Fischerova D; Franchi D; Testa A; Di Legge A; Epstein E
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 45(4):470-5. PubMed ID: 25092154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MR findings.
Kim SH; Choi BI; Lee HP; Kang SB; Choi YM; Han MC; Kim CW
Radiology; 1990 Apr; 175(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 2315503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Contrast-enhanced MRI in preoperative assessment of myometrial and cervical invasion, and lymph node metastasis: diagnostic value and error analysis in endometrial carcinoma.
Teng F; Zhang YF; Wang YM; Yu J; Lang X; Tian WY; Jiang CX; Xue FX
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Mar; 94(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 25545203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Fusion of PET and MRI for staging of uterine cervical cancer: comparison with contrast-enhanced (18)F-FDG PET/CT and pelvic MRI.
Kitajima K; Suenaga Y; Ueno Y; Kanda T; Maeda T; Deguchi M; Ebina Y; Yamada H; Takahashi S; Sugimura K
Clin Imaging; 2014; 38(4):464-469. PubMed ID: 24642250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Role of X-ray computed tomography in the staging of cervical carcinoma].
Kojima Y
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Mar; 41(3):341-8. PubMed ID: 2732565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Value of magnetic resonance imaging with an endovaginal receiver coil in the pre-operative assessment of Stage I and IIa cervical neoplasia.
deSouza NM; McIndoe GA; Soutter WP; Krausz T; Chui KM; Hughes C; Mason WP
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 May; 105(5):500-7. PubMed ID: 9637118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. What Is the Role of Imaging at Primary Diagnostic Work-Up in Uterine Cervical Cancer?
Haldorsen IS; Lura N; Blaakær J; Fischerova D; Werner HMJ
Curr Oncol Rep; 2019 Jul; 21(9):77. PubMed ID: 31359169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
