These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

468 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7784555)

  • 1. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions.
    Stavros AT; Thickman D; Rapp CL; Dennis MA; Parker SH; Sisney GA
    Radiology; 1995 Jul; 196(1):123-34. PubMed ID: 7784555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic workup.
    Buchberger W; DeKoekkoek-Doll P; Springer P; Obrist P; Dünser M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Oct; 173(4):921-7. PubMed ID: 10511149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tl-201 scintigraphy, mammography and ultrasonography in the evaluation of palpable and nonpalpable breast lesions: a correlative study.
    Ozdemir A; Oznur II; Vural G; Atasever T; Karabacak NI; Gökçora N; Işik S; Unlü M
    Eur J Radiol; 1997 Feb; 24(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 9097057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do mammography, sonography, and MR mammography have a diagnostic benefit compared with mammography and sonography?
    Müller-Schimpfle M; Stoll P; Stern W; Kurz S; Dammann F; Claussen CD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1323-9. PubMed ID: 9129436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Color Doppler sonography in the evaluation of palpable breast masses.
    McNicholas MM; Mercer PM; Miller JC; McDermott EW; O'Higgins NJ; MacErlean DP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Oct; 161(4):765-71. PubMed ID: 8372754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features.
    Hong AS; Rosen EL; Soo MS; Baker JA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Apr; 184(4):1260-5. PubMed ID: 15788607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated Breast Volume Scanning: Identifying 3-D Coronal Plane Imaging Features May Help Categorize Complex Cysts.
    Wang HY; Jiang YX; Zhu QL; Zhang J; Xiao MS; Liu H; Dai Q; Li JC; Sun Q
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Mar; 42(3):689-98. PubMed ID: 26742895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of sonographic features in the differentiation of fibroadenoma and invasive ductal carcinoma.
    Skaane P; Engedal K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 9423610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamic multidetector CT of breast tumors: diagnostic features and comparison with conventional techniques.
    Inoue M; Sano T; Watai R; Ashikaga R; Ueda K; Watatani M; Nishimura Y
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Sep; 181(3):679-86. PubMed ID: 12933459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sonographic detection of multifocality in breast carcinoma.
    Park JM; Yoon GS; Kim SM; Ahn SH
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2003; 31(6):293-8. PubMed ID: 12811787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of unenhanced Doppler sonography in the evaluation of solid breast lesions.
    del Cura JL; Elizagaray E; Zabala R; Legórburu A; Grande D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jun; 184(6):1788-94. PubMed ID: 15908531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Streaming detection for evaluation of indeterminate sonographic breast masses: a pilot study.
    Soo MS; Ghate SV; Baker JA; Rosen EL; Walsh R; Warwick BN; Ramachandran AR; Nightingale KR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 May; 186(5):1335-41. PubMed ID: 16632728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions: detection and classification with high-resolution sonography.
    Buchberger W; Niehoff A; Obrist P; DeKoekkoek-Doll P; Dünser M
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2000 Aug; 21(4):325-36. PubMed ID: 11014255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The accuracy of breast ultrasound in the evaluation of clinically benign discrete, symptomatic breast lumps.
    Lister D; Evans AJ; Burrell HC; Blamey RW; Wilson AR; Pinder SE; Ellis IO; Elston CW; Kollias J
    Clin Radiol; 1998 Jul; 53(7):490-2. PubMed ID: 9714387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultrasonographic hyperechoic lesions of the breast: are they always benign?
    Nam SY; Ko ES; Han BK; Shin S; Ko EY; Shin JH; Hahn SY
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Jan; 56(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 24252817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of ultrasound elastography, mammography, and sonography in the diagnosis of solid breast lesions.
    Zhi H; Ou B; Luo BM; Feng X; Wen YL; Yang HY
    J Ultrasound Med; 2007 Jun; 26(6):807-15. PubMed ID: 17526612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hyperechoic lesions of the breast: not always benign.
    Linda A; Zuiani C; Lorenzon M; Furlan A; Girometti R; Londero V; Bazzocchi M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 May; 196(5):1219-24. PubMed ID: 21512095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Automated mammary sonography and mammography: the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions].
    Richter K; Hamm B; Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Fobbe F; Prihoda H; Schmitt KJ; Frohberg HD; Winzer KJ; Aldinger HU; Guski H; Döinghaus K; Löhr G
    Rofo; 1998 Sep; 169(3):245-52. PubMed ID: 9779063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Role of radiologic features in the management of papillary lesions of the breast.
    Lam WW; Chu WC; Tang AP; Tse G; Ma TK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 May; 186(5):1322-7. PubMed ID: 16632726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Role of breast MR imaging for predicting malignancy of histologically borderline lesions diagnosed at core needle biopsy: prospective evaluation.
    Pediconi F; Padula S; Dominelli V; Luciani M; Telesca M; Casali V; Kirchin MA; Passariello R; Catalano C
    Radiology; 2010 Dec; 257(3):653-61. PubMed ID: 20884914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.