206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7784558)
21. Peripheral washout sign on contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast.
Sherif H; Mahfouz AE; Oellinger H; Hadijuana J; Blohmer JU; Taupitz M; Felix R; Hamm B
Radiology; 1997 Oct; 205(1):209-13. PubMed ID: 9314987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Fast 3D Near-infrared breast imaging using indocyanine green for detection and characterization of breast lesions.
Schneider P; Piper S; Schmitz CH; Schreiter NF; Volkwein N; Lüdemann L; Malzahn U; Poellinger A
Rofo; 2011 Oct; 183(10):956-63. PubMed ID: 21972043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. MR lesion detection in a breast cancer population.
Obdeijn IM; Kuijpers TJ; van Dijk P; Wiggers T; Oudkerk M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1996; 6(6):849-54. PubMed ID: 8956127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent.
Boetes C; Mus RD; Holland R; Barentsz JO; Strijk SP; Wobbes T; Hendriks JH; Ruys SH
Radiology; 1995 Dec; 197(3):743-7. PubMed ID: 7480749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Primary breast abnormalities: selective pixel sampling on dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR images.
Mussurakis S; Gibbs P; Horsman A
Radiology; 1998 Feb; 206(2):465-73. PubMed ID: 9457201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Contrast medium assisted dynamic MR-mammography after diagnostic and therapeutic interventions on the breast].
Fischer U; Vosshenrich R; Kopka L; Kahlen O; Grabbe E
Bildgebung; 1996 Jun; 63(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 8756151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Benign and malignant breast lesions: diagnosis with multiparametric MR imaging.
Jacobs MA; Barker PB; Bluemke DA; Maranto C; Arnold C; Herskovits EH; Bhujwalla Z
Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):225-32. PubMed ID: 14519877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation.
Orel SG; Schnall MD; LiVolsi VA; Troupin RH
Radiology; 1994 Feb; 190(2):485-93. PubMed ID: 8284404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast in patients with breast implants after cancer surgery.
Boné B; Aspelin P; Isberg B; Perbeck L; Veress B
Acta Radiol; 1995 Mar; 36(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 7710787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The variability of fibroadenoma in contrast-enhanced dynamic MR mammography.
Brinck U; Fischer U; Korabiowska M; Jutrowski M; Schauer A; Grabbe E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1331-4. PubMed ID: 9129437
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Focal liver lesions: characterization with nonenhanced and dynamic contrast material-enhanced MR imaging.
Hamm B; Thoeni RF; Gould RG; Bernardino ME; Lüning M; Saini S; Mahfouz AE; Taupitz M; Wolf KJ
Radiology; 1994 Feb; 190(2):417-23. PubMed ID: 8284392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of mammographic breast lesions with Tc-99m sestamibi scintimammography and contrast enhanced MRI.
Sommer H; Tiling R; Pechmann M; Kindermann G; Kress K; Moser R; Tatsch K; Hahn K; Pfluger T; Assemi C
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1997; 119(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 9050197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Washout of mass-like benign breast lesions at dynamic magnetic resonance imaging.
Tannaphai P; Trimboli RM; Carbonaro LA; Viganò S; Di Leo G; Sardanelli F
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):301-5. PubMed ID: 22592612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Differentiation between benign and malignant findings on MR-mammography: usefulness of morphological criteria.
Wedegärtner U; Bick U; Wörtler K; Rummeny E; Bongartz G
Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(9):1645-50. PubMed ID: 11511885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: pulse sequence with fat suppression and magnetization transfer contrast. Work in progress.
Pierce WB; Harms SE; Flamig DP; Griffey RH; Evans WP; Hagans JE
Radiology; 1991 Dec; 181(3):757-63. PubMed ID: 1947093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Dynamic 3D-MR mammography: is there a benefit of sophisticated evaluation of enhancement curves for clinical routine?
Müller-Schimpfle M; Ohmenhäuser K; Sand J; Stoll P; Claussen CD
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1997; 7(1):236-40. PubMed ID: 9039622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [MRI of the breast. Techniques and current values].
Gilles R
Cancer Radiother; 2003 Nov; 7 Suppl 1():115s-119s. PubMed ID: 15124552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [MR mammography in patients at risk].
Kaiser WA; Mittelmeier O
Rofo; 1992 Jun; 156(6):576-81. PubMed ID: 1617179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Dynamic MR imaging of the breast combined with analysis of contrast agent kinetics in the differentiation of primary breast tumours.
Mussurakis S; Buckley DL; Drew PJ; Fox JN; Carleton PJ; Turnbull LW; Horsman A
Clin Radiol; 1997 Jul; 52(7):516-26. PubMed ID: 9240704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Is there a correlation in breast carcinomas between tumor size and number of tumor vessels detected by gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography?
Siewert C; Oellinger H; Sherif HK; Blohmer JU; Hadijuana J; Felix R
MAGMA; 1997 Mar; 5(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 9219176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
