217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7784853)
21. The introduction of a new contraceptive; two years experience with Norplant.
Davie J; Hiremath K; Glasier A
Health Bull (Edinb); 1996 Jul; 54(4):314-7. PubMed ID: 8783485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The performance of levonorgestrel rod and Norplant contraceptive implants: a 5 year randomized study.
Sivin I; Campodonico I; Kiriwat O; Holma P; Diaz S; Wan L; Biswas A; Viegas O; el din Abdalla K; Anant MP; Pavez M; Stern J
Hum Reprod; 1998 Dec; 13(12):3371-8. PubMed ID: 9886517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Acceptability of Norplant-2 rods as a method of family planning.
Singh K; Viegas OA; Ratnam SS
Contraception; 1992 May; 45(5):453-61. PubMed ID: 1623717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Continuation rates of long-acting methods of contraception. A comparative study of Norplant implants and intrauterine devices.
Fleming D; Davie J; Glasier A
Contraception; 1998 Jan; 57(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 9554246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Norplant debate: dollars v. sense? Price problems dog implant in Britain.
Kennett J
Family Plan World; 1994; 4(1):1, 16-7. PubMed ID: 12318851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Experience with NORPLANT in Egypt.
Shaaban MM
Ann Med; 1993 Apr; 25(2):167-9. PubMed ID: 8489755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Impact of patient counseling on acceptance of the levonorgestrel implant contraceptive in the United Kingdom.
Davie JE; Walling MR; Mansour DJ; Bromham D; Kishen M; Fowler P
Clin Ther; 1996; 18(1):150-9. PubMed ID: 8851460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Programmatic challenges: training, counseling and removals.
Finger WR
Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1990 Dec; 11(4):9-12. PubMed ID: 12283721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Norplant implants in the UK: first year continuation and removals.
Peers T; Stevens JE; Graham J; Davey A
Contraception; 1996 Jun; 53(6):345-51. PubMed ID: 8773421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Characteristics and attitudes of early contraceptive implant acceptors in Texas.
Frank ML; Poindexter AN; Johnson ML; Bateman L
Fam Plann Perspect; 1992; 24(5):208-13. PubMed ID: 1426182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Another view on Norplant: match method with users.
Herndon N
Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1992 Oct; 13(2):24-6. PubMed ID: 12286081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Norplant: what health educators need to know.
Ogletree RJ; Welshimer KJ
J Health Educ; 1994; 25(4):230-3. PubMed ID: 12288963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Three countries' experience with Norplant introduction.
Hardee K; Balogh S; Villinski MT
Health Policy Plan; 1997 Sep; 12(3):199-213. PubMed ID: 10173401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A five-year clinical evaluation of Norplant contraceptive subdermal implants in Bangladeshi acceptors.
Akhter H; Dunson TR; Amatya RN; Begum K; Chowdhury T; Dighe N; Krueger SL; Rahman S
Contraception; 1993 Jun; 47(6):569-82. PubMed ID: 8334891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Perceptions and satisfaction among Norplant users in Finland.
Sihvo S; Ollila E; Hemminki E
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1995 Jul; 74(6):441-5. PubMed ID: 7604687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Injectable and implantable contraceptives.
Cullins VE
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Aug; 4(4):536-43. PubMed ID: 1387011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Training, counseling and extraction: challenges posed by Norplant].
Finger W
Netw Fr; 1991 May; 6(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 12319668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Norplant contraceptive implants: rods versus capsules.
Pasquale SA; Brandeis V; Cruz RI; Kelly S; Sweeney M
Contraception; 1987 Sep; 36(3):305-16. PubMed ID: 3119287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Acceptability of an experimental intracervical device: results of a study controlling for selection bias.
Shain RN; Ratsula K; Toivonen J; Lähteenmäki P; Luukkainen T; Holden AE; Rosenthal M
Contraception; 1989 Jan; 39(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 2491982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Assessing the acceptability of Norplant contraceptive in four patient populations.
Dugoff L; Jones OW; Allen-Davis J; Hurst BS; Schlaff WD
Contraception; 1995 Jul; 52(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 8521714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
