These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7784853)

  • 41. Family planning in Russia: experience and attitudes of gynecologists.
    Visser AP; Bruyniks N; Remennick L
    Adv Contracept; 1993 Jun; 9(2):93-104. PubMed ID: 8237572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. An evaluation of the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD: its advantages and disadvantages when compared to the copper-releasing IUDs.
    Chi IC
    Contraception; 1991 Dec; 44(6):573-88. PubMed ID: 1773615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Characteristics and experiences of American women electing for early removal of contraceptive implants.
    Frank ML; Ditmore JR; Ilegbodu AE; Bateman L; Poindexter AN
    Contraception; 1995 Sep; 52(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 7587187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Innovations in contraception: the Norplant system.
    Klaisle CM; Wysocki S
    NAACOGS Clin Issu Perinat Womens Health Nurs; 1992; 3(2):267-79. PubMed ID: 1596435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. New IPPF statement on breastfeeding, fertility and post-partum contraception.
    International Planned Parenthood Federation IPPF. International Medical Advisory Panel IMAP
    IPPF Med Bull; 1990 Apr; 24(2):2-4. PubMed ID: 12316285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Assessing the acceptability of NORPLANT implants in four countries: findings from focus group research.
    Zimmerman M; Haffey J; Crane E; Szumowski D; Alvarez F; Bhiromrut P; Brache V; Lubis F; Salah M; Shaaban M
    Stud Fam Plann; 1990; 21(2):92-103. PubMed ID: 2112794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Patient satisfaction with a levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implant. Reasons for and patterns of removal.
    Haugen MM; Evans CB; Kim MH
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Nov; 41(11):849-54. PubMed ID: 8951137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Clinicians, patients, Medicaid: is anyone to blame for Norplant removal dilemma? Part II.
    Contracept Technol Update; 1993 Oct; 14(10):149-53. PubMed ID: 12286902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Metabolic parameter, bleeding, and weight changes in U.S. women using progestin only contraceptives.
    Mainwaring R; Hales HA; Stevenson K; Hatasaka HH; Poulson AM; Jones KP; Peterson CM
    Contraception; 1995 Mar; 51(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 7621683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Contraceptive implants.
    Ladipo O; Coutinho EM
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Dec; 6(6):564-9. PubMed ID: 7893965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Reasons for pregnancy termination: negligence or failure of contraception?
    Savonius H; Pakarinen P; Sjöberg L; Kajanoja P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1995 Nov; 74(10):818-21. PubMed ID: 8533567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A preliminary report of Norplant implant insertions in a large urban family planning program.
    Crosby UD; Schwarz BE; Gluck KL; Heartwell SF
    Contraception; 1993 Oct; 48(4):359-66. PubMed ID: 8222663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Set clear guidelines for Norplant removals.
    Contracept Technol Update; 1999 Mar; 20(3):29-31. PubMed ID: 12321964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Clinics: Norplant cost chokes services.
    Family Plan World; 1993; 3(5):1, 28. PubMed ID: 12319135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Interest in Norplant escalates as UK launch approaches.
    Fam Plann Today; 1993; ():2. PubMed ID: 12287164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Attitudes towards contraceptive implants and injectables among present and former users in Singapore.
    Singh K; Viegas OA; Ratnam SS
    J Biosoc Sci; 1990 Jan; 22(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 2105323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. NORPLANT contraceptive implants advancing.
    Segal SJ
    Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1984; 5(3):1-3. PubMed ID: 12279797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Experience with side effects and health risks associated with Norplant implant use in adolescents.
    Rosenthal SL; Biro FM; Kollar LM; Hillard PJ; Rauh JL
    Contraception; 1995 Nov; 52(5):283-5. PubMed ID: 8585884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The case of Norplant as an example of media coverage over the life of a new health technology.
    Entwistle VA; Watt IS; Johnson F
    Lancet; 2000 May; 355(9215):1633-6. PubMed ID: 10821380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Statement on Norplant subdermal contraceptive implant system.
    International Planned Parenthood Federation IPPF. International Medical Advisory Panel IMAP
    IPPF Med Bull; 1985 Dec; 19(6):1-3. PubMed ID: 12267509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.