These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7784859)

  • 1. Reducing random measurement error in assessing postural load on the back in epidemiologic surveys.
    Burdorf A
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 1995 Feb; 21(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 7784859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sources of variance in exposure to postural load on the back in occupational groups.
    Burdorf A
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 1992 Dec; 18(6):361-7. PubMed ID: 1485161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bias in risk estimates from variability of exposure to postural load on the back in occupational groups.
    Burdorf A
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 1993 Feb; 19(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 8465172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of methods for the assessment of postural load on the back.
    Burdorf A; Laan J
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 1991 Dec; 17(6):425-9. PubMed ID: 1838618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preparation of dynamic posture and occurrence of low back pain.
    Omino K; Hayashi Y
    Ergonomics; 1992; 35(5-6):693-707. PubMed ID: 1535315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bias and power in group-based epidemiologic studies of low-back pain exposure and outcome--effects of study size and exposure measurement efforts.
    Coenen P; Mathiassen SE; Kingma I; Boot CR; Bongers PM; van Dieën JH
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2015 May; 59(4):439-54. PubMed ID: 25433002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Challenges in assessing risk factors in epidemiologic studies on back disorders.
    Burdorf A; Rossignol M; Fathallah FA; Snook SH; Herrick RF
    Am J Ind Med; 1997 Aug; 32(2):142-52. PubMed ID: 9215436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reproducibility of postural control measurement during unstable sitting in low back pain patients.
    Van Daele U; Huyvaert S; Hagman F; Duquet W; Van Gheluwe B; Vaes P
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2007 May; 8():44. PubMed ID: 17519016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Occupational sitting behaviour and its relationship with back pain - A pilot study.
    Zemp R; Fliesser M; Wippert PM; Taylor WR; Lorenzetti S
    Appl Ergon; 2016 Sep; 56():84-91. PubMed ID: 27184315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interview versus questionnaire for assessing physical loads in the population-based MUSIC-Norrtälje Study.
    Wiktorin C; Vingård E; Mortimer M; Pernold G; Wigaeus-Hjelm E; Kilbom A; Alfredsson L
    Am J Ind Med; 1999 May; 35(5):441-55. PubMed ID: 10212697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Flexion and rotation of the trunk and lifting at work are risk factors for low back pain: results of a prospective cohort study.
    Hoogendoorn WE; Bongers PM; de Vet HC; Douwes M; Koes BW; Miedema MC; Ariëns GA; Bouter LM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Dec; 25(23):3087-92. PubMed ID: 11145822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative postural load assessment for whole body manual tasks based on perceived discomfort.
    Chung MK; Lee I; Kee D
    Ergonomics; 2005 Apr; 48(5):492-505. PubMed ID: 16040522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prevalence of back discomfort and estimates of back load in two manufacturing facilities.
    Liu WC; Sanchez-Monroy D
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1998 Nov; 42(8):549-56. PubMed ID: 9838868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intra-session absolute and relative reliability of pressure pain thresholds in the low back region of vine-workers: ffect of the number of trials.
    Balaguier R; Madeleine P; Vuillerme N
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Aug; 17(1):350. PubMed ID: 27538914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Studies of spinal shrinkage to evaluate low-back loading in the workplace.
    McGill SM; van Wijk MJ; Axler CT; Gletsu M
    Ergonomics; 1996 Jan; 39(1):92-102. PubMed ID: 8851075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy and precision of variance components in occupational posture recordings: a simulation study of different data collection strategies.
    Liv P; Mathiassen SE; Svendsen SW
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Jun; 12():58. PubMed ID: 22533627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of measurement strategy and statistical analysis on dose-response relations between physical workload and low back pain.
    Jansen JP; Burdorf A
    Occup Environ Med; 2003 Dec; 60(12):942-7. PubMed ID: 14634186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of Lumbar Spine Load by Computational Method in Order to Acknowledge Low-back Disorders as Occupational Diseases.
    Hlávková J; Lebeda T; Tichý T; Gaďourek P; Urban P; Nakládalová M; Laštovková A; Fenclová Z; Ridzoň P; Ehler E; Richter M; Pešáková L; Pelclová D
    Cent Eur J Public Health; 2016 Mar; 24(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 27070971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimation of compressive forces on lumbar spine from categorical posture data.
    Tak S; Punnett L; Paquet V; Woskie S; Buchholz B
    Ergonomics; 2007 Dec; 50(12):2082-94. PubMed ID: 17852375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of mental processing on low back load while lifting an object.
    Katsuhira J; Matsudaira K; Iwakiri K; Kimura Y; Ohashi T; Ono R; Sugita S; Fukuda K; Abe S; Maruyama H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(13):E832-9. PubMed ID: 23722573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.