BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7784877)

  • 1. [Personnel and instrumental differences in the treatment of root surfaces. A comparison on a phantom model].
    Stassinakis A; Hugo B; Hotz P
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1995; 105(5):623-8. PubMed ID: 7784877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vivo scaling and root planing forces in molars.
    Zappa U; Röthlisberger JP; Simona C; Case D
    J Periodontol; 1993 May; 64(5):349-54. PubMed ID: 8515364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vivo ultrasonic debridement forces in bicuspids: a pilot study.
    Ruppert M; Cadosch J; Guindy J; Case D; Zappa U
    J Periodontol; 2002 Apr; 73(4):418-22. PubMed ID: 11990443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effectiveness of scaling and root planing with curets designed for deep pockets.
    Nagy RJ; Otomo-Corgel J; Stambaugh R
    J Periodontol; 1992 Dec; 63(12):954-9. PubMed ID: 1474467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Root instrumentation. Power-driven versus manual scalers, which one?
    Drisko CH
    Dent Clin North Am; 1998 Apr; 42(2):229-44. PubMed ID: 9597335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of miniaturized manual versus mechanical instruments on calculus removal and root surface characteristics: An in vitro light microscopic study.
    Profili F; Sparabombe S; Tawse Smith A; D'Isidoro O; Quaranta A
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2019 Oct; 5(5):519-527. PubMed ID: 31687186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical evaluation of the speed and effectiveness of subgingival calculus removal on single-rooted teeth with diamond-coated ultrasonic tips.
    Yukna RA; Scott JB; Aichelmann-Reidy ME; LeBlanc DM; Mayer ET
    J Periodontol; 1997 May; 68(5):436-42. PubMed ID: 9182738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative in vitro effectiveness of closed root debridement with fine instruments on specific areas of mandibular first molar furcations. II. Furcation area.
    Otero-Cagide FJ; Long BA
    J Periodontol; 1997 Nov; 68(11):1098-101. PubMed ID: 9407403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparative study between different techniques in non-surgical periodontal treatment.
    Forabosco A; Spinato S; Grandi T; Prini M
    Minerva Stomatol; 2006 May; 55(5):289-96. PubMed ID: 16688105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Er:YAG laser in defocused mode for scaling of periodontally involved root surfaces: an in vitro pilot study.
    Crespi R; Romanos GE; Barone A; Sculean A; Covani U
    J Periodontol; 2005 May; 76(5):686-90. PubMed ID: 15898927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical evaluation of subgingival debridement with ultrasonic instruments used by trained and untrained operators.
    Dragoo MR; Wheeler BG
    Gen Dent; 1996; 44(3):234-7. PubMed ID: 8957817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of a new periodontal curet. An in vitro study.
    Singer DL; Long BA; Lozanoff S; Senthilselvan A
    J Clin Periodontol; 1992 Sep; 19(8):549-52. PubMed ID: 1447379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative in vitro effectiveness of closed root debridement with fine instruments on specific areas of mandibular first molar furcations. I. Root trunk and furcation entrance.
    Otero-Cagide FJ; Long BA
    J Periodontol; 1997 Nov; 68(11):1093-7. PubMed ID: 9407402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Learning root debridement with curettes and power-driven instruments. Part I: a training program to increase effectivity.
    Rühling A; Schlemme H; König J; Kocher T; Schwahn C; Plagmann HC
    J Clin Periodontol; 2002 Jul; 29(7):622-9. PubMed ID: 12354087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vivo scaling and root planing forces.
    Zappa U; Cadosch J; Simona C; Graf H; Case D
    J Periodontol; 1991 May; 62(5):335-40. PubMed ID: 2072247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The clinical effectiveness of open versus closed scaling and root planing on multi-rooted teeth.
    Wylam JM; Mealey BL; Mills MP; Waldrop TC; Moskowicz DC
    J Periodontol; 1993 Nov; 64(11):1023-8. PubMed ID: 8295086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative clinical responses related to the use of various periodontal instrumentation.
    Obeid PR; D'Hoore W; Bercy P
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 31(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 15016023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Instruments and methods for the quantitative measurement of factors affecting hygienist/dentist efforts during scaling and root planing of the teeth.
    White DJ; Cox ER; Arends J; Nieborg JH; Leydsman H; Wieringa DW; Dijkman AG; Ruben JR
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(2 Spec No):32-40. PubMed ID: 9238895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vivo and in vitro effects of an Er:YAG laser, a GaAlAs diode laser, and scaling and root planing on periodontally diseased root surfaces: a comparative histologic study.
    Schwarz F; Sculean A; Berakdar M; Szathmari L; Georg T; Becker J
    Lasers Surg Med; 2003; 32(5):359-66. PubMed ID: 12766958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scaling and root planing without overinstrumentation: hand versus power-driven scalers.
    Drisko CL
    Curr Opin Periodontol; 1993; ():78-88. PubMed ID: 8401851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.