These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7785937)
1. [How to compose an expert report]. Grateau P Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1994; 111(6):355-8. PubMed ID: 7785937 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Choice of the expert medical witness: his objection and incompatibilities]. Doll PJ Nouv Presse Med; 1972 Sep; 1(34):2257-8. PubMed ID: 5081774 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Use of expert testimony]. L'Epée P; Lazarini HJ Med Leg Dommage Corpor; 1973; 6(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 4800658 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Medical expertise]. Rousseau C Med Leg Dommage Corpor; 1969; 2(2):132-40 concl. PubMed ID: 5408987 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Apropos of Project 1720 on major incompetence: discussion of several passages]. Baruk H Ann Med Psychol (Paris); 1967 Jun; 125(1):79-94. PubMed ID: 6073823 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Medical responsibility. Viewpoint of the jurist and the physician]. Bréhant J Presse Med (1893); 1971 Jan; 79(6):257-8. PubMed ID: 5546797 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Use of tables indicating disability]. Dérobert L Med Leg Dommage Corpor; 1974; 7(4):292-6. PubMed ID: 4470130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Expert medical testimony is generally required to prove medical negligence. McCarter WD; Hayek TJ Mo Med; 2001 Oct; 98(10):488-9. PubMed ID: 11668860 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Medical and expert legislation. Notes on the newest jurisdictions]. Friederichs H Fortschr Med; 1978 Sep; 96(36):1821-2. PubMed ID: 151663 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Comments on U.Stern: Med. Klin. 67(1972), 505 and 1604 and G.Könnecke: Med. Klin. 67(1972),1603. The necessity of the knowledge of laws for the delivery of a useful medical expert testimony]. Jessnitzer K Med Klin; 1973 Aug; 68(34):1132-4. PubMed ID: 4790873 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The "imparital" medical expert: a new look at an old issue. Moenssens AA Med Trial Tech Q; 1978; 25(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 723530 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [New regulation of compensation for legal advisers. Supplement to the report in Med Klin 63 (1968), 231]. Jessnitzer K Med Klin; 1970 Feb; 65(7):322-4. PubMed ID: 5519228 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Medical consultation and expert testimony in claims litigation. Professional and ethical guidelines. Roberts HJ J Insur Med; 1991; 23(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 10148473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiological investigation for expert and medico-legal purposes. Villari N; Norelli GA; Corridoni F; Minigrilli M Radiol Med; 2003 Apr; 105(4):370-5. PubMed ID: 12835631 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Expert witness malfeasance: how should specialty societies respond? Feld AD; Carey WD Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 May; 100(5):991-5. PubMed ID: 15842567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Expert witnesses: setting standards--improving credibility. Botney M Mo Med; 2006; 103(6):579-81. PubMed ID: 17256261 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [On the remuneration of medical experts with especial professional knowledge]. Rieger HJ Med Welt; 1966 Jan; 5():257-8. PubMed ID: 5945460 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Legal aspects in ophthalmological expert assessment: part I]. Tost F; Gass C Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2007 May; 224(5):R57-72; quiz R73-4. PubMed ID: 17516366 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]