153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7786643)
1. Cross calibration of QDR-2000 and QDR-1000 dual-energy X-ray densitometers for bone mineral and soft-tissue measurements.
Abrahamsen B; Gram J; Hansen TB; Beck-Nielsen H
Bone; 1995 Mar; 16(3):385-90. PubMed ID: 7786643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparisons between Hologic QDR 1000W, QDR 4500A, and Lunar Expert dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanners used for measuring total body bone and soft tissue.
Tothill P; Hannan WJ
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2000 May; 904():63-71. PubMed ID: 10865711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cross-calibration of DXA equipment: upgrading from a Hologic QDR 1000/W to a QDR 2000.
Faulkner KG; Glüer CC; Estilo M; Genant HK
Calcif Tissue Int; 1993 Feb; 52(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 8443695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cross-Calibrated Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Scanners Demonstrate Systematic Bias in Pediatric and Young Adult Females.
Dowthwaite JN; Dunsmore KA; Wang D; Rosenbaum PF; Scerpella TA
J Clin Densitom; 2018; 21(2):281-294. PubMed ID: 28258886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Total body and regional bone mineral densitometry (BMD) and soft tissue measurements: correlations of BMD parameter to lumbar spine and hip.
Franck H; Munz M
Calcif Tissue Int; 2000 Aug; 67(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 10920214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone mineral measurement--comparison of a single-beam and fan-beam design: the effect of osteophytic calcification on spine bone mineral density.
Franck H; Munz M; Scherrer M
Calcif Tissue Int; 1995 Mar; 56(3):192-5. PubMed ID: 7750022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparisons between a pencil beam and two fan beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometers used for measuring total body bone and soft tissue.
Tothill P; Hannan WJ; Wilkinson S
Br J Radiol; 2001 Feb; 74(878):166-76. PubMed ID: 11718390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: clinical evaluation of a new cone-beam system.
Blake GM; Knapp KM; Fogelman I
Calcif Tissue Int; 2005 Feb; 76(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 15645160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of body composition and bone mineral measurements from two DXA instruments in young men.
Modlesky CM; Lewis RD; Yetman KA; Rose B; Rosskopf LB; Snow TK; Sparling PB
Am J Clin Nutr; 1996 Nov; 64(5):669-76. PubMed ID: 8901784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Switching from DXA pencil-beam to fan-beam. I: Studies in vitro at four centers.
Eiken P; Bärenholdt O; Bjørn Jensen L; Gram J; Pors Nielsen S
Bone; 1994; 15(6):667-70. PubMed ID: 7873295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bone mineral density of opposing hips using dual energy X-Ray absorptiometry in single-beam and fan-beam design.
Franck H; Munz M; Scherrer M
Calcif Tissue Int; 1997 Dec; 61(6):445-7. PubMed ID: 9383269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison and cross-calibration of DXA systems: ODX-240 and Sophos L-XRA versus Hologic QDR-4500, for spinal bone mineral measurement. Translation of a reference database.
Benmalek A; Sabatier JP
Osteoporos Int; 1998; 8(6):570-7. PubMed ID: 10326063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of four methods for cross-calibrating dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers to eliminate systematic errors when upgrading equipment.
Finkelstein JS; Butler JP; Cleary RL; Neer RM
J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Dec; 9(12):1945-52. PubMed ID: 7872060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements in small subjects: conditions affecting clinical measurements.
Koo WW; Hockman EM; Hammami M
J Am Coll Nutr; 2004 Jun; 23(3):212-9. PubMed ID: 15190045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hologic QDR 2000 whole-body scans: a comparison of three combinations of scan modes and analysis software.
Spector E; LeBlanc A; Shackelford L
Osteoporos Int; 1995; 5(6):440-5. PubMed ID: 8695965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intersite comparison of the Hologic QDR-1000 dual energy X-ray bone densitometer.
Blake GM; Tong CM; Fogelman I
Br J Radiol; 1991 May; 64(761):440-6. PubMed ID: 2036569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Switching from DXA pencil-beam to fan-beam. II: Studies in vivo.
Eiken P; Kolthoff N; Bärenholdt O; Hermansen F; Pors Nielsen S
Bone; 1994; 15(6):671-6. PubMed ID: 7873296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A DXA Whole Body Composition Cross-Calibration Experience: Evaluation With Humans, Spine, and Whole Body Phantoms.
Krueger D; Libber J; Sanfilippo J; Yu HJ; Horvath B; Miller CG; Binkley N
J Clin Densitom; 2016; 19(2):220-5. PubMed ID: 26071169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of two Hologic DXA systems (QDR 1000 and QDR 4500/A).
Barthe N; Braillon P; Ducassou D; Basse-Cathalinat B
Br J Radiol; 1997 Jul; 70(835):728-39. PubMed ID: 9245885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anomalies in dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of total-body bone mineral during weight change using Lunar, Hologic and Norland instruments.
Tothill P; Laskey MA; Orphanidou CI; van Wijk M
Br J Radiol; 1999 Jul; 72(859):661-9. PubMed ID: 10624323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
