238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7788234)
21. Studying the dose level for different X-ray energy conventional radiography by TLD-100.
Ghoneam SM; Mahmoud KR; Diab HM; El-Sersy A
Appl Radiat Isot; 2022 Mar; 181():110066. PubMed ID: 34968881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The effect of a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) on patient radiation doses for examination of the lateral lumbar spine.
Weatherburn GC; Bryan S
Br J Radiol; 1999 Jun; 72(858):534-45. PubMed ID: 10560334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Entrance surface and ovarian doses in hysterosalpingography.
Fife IA; Wilson DJ; Lewis CA
Br J Radiol; 1994 Sep; 67(801):860-3. PubMed ID: 7953227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Computed radiography in scoliosis. Diagnostic information and radiation dose.
Jónsson A; Jonsson K; Eklund K; Holje G; Pettersson H
Acta Radiol; 1995 Jul; 36(4):429-33. PubMed ID: 7619625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Implementation of a programme for reduction of radiographic doses and results achieved through increases in tube potential.
Martin CJ; Darragh CL; McKenzie GA; Bayliss AP
Br J Radiol; 1993 Mar; 66(783):228-33. PubMed ID: 8472116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Survey of patient doses from conventional diagnostic radiographic examinations in Syria.
Kharita MH; Khedr MS; Wannus KM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Jul; 140(2):163-5. PubMed ID: 20332131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Estimation of patients' organ doses and conceptus doses from selected X-ray examinations in two Nigeria X-ray centres.
Ogundare FO; Olarinoye IO; Obed RI
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 132(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 19129203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. DETERMINATION OF ENTRANCE SURFACE DOSE FOR THREE COMMON PLANAR DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY EXAMINATIONS.
Jeyasugiththan J; Ehalagasthanna GPNT; Hishaam U; Satharasinghe DM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2022 Oct; 198(18):1361-1367. PubMed ID: 36037526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of entrance surface doses of some X ray examinations with CEC reference doses.
Ogunseyinde AO; Adeniran SA; Obed RI; Akinlade BI; Ogundare FO
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 98(2):231-4. PubMed ID: 11930883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An investigation of X-ray equipment factors influencing patient dose in radiography.
Williams JR; Catling MK
Br J Radiol; 1998 Nov; 71(851):1192-8. PubMed ID: 10434915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Results of a patient dose survey on diagnostic radiology in Lithuania.
Ziliukas J; Morkunas G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):172-5. PubMed ID: 15933102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. ESTIMATION OF ENTRANCE SURFACE AIR KERMA IN DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHIC EXAMINATIONS.
Kaushik C; Sandhu IS; Srivastava AK; Chitkara M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2021 Jan; 193(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 33683324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessment of Patient Radiation Dose during Conventional Diagnostic X-ray Examinations in Three Public Hospitals in Northern Jordan using TLDs.
Ababneh ZQ; Ababneh AM; Bani Hani MS; Ababneh RS; Aljarrah KM
Health Phys; 2020 Jun; 118(6):593-599. PubMed ID: 32348097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effect of breast shielding outside the field of view on breast entrance surface dose in axial X-ray examinations: a phantom study.
Hurley L; Alashban Y; Albeshan S; England A; McEntee MF
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2023 May; 29(3):555-560. PubMed ID: 37129301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Dosimetry of pediatric chest X-Ray examinations in Togo.
Adambounou K; Sedo K; Yao Adigo AM; Sonhaye L; Sodogas F; Adjenou V
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2021 Jun; 52(2):265-271. PubMed ID: 33632622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. LOW BMI PATIENT DOSE IN DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY.
Efthymiou FO; Metaxas VI; Dimitroukas CP; Panayiotakis GS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Jul; 189(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 32043128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Dose reduction in a paediatric X-ray department following optimization of radiographic technique.
Mooney R; Thomas PS
Br J Radiol; 1998 Aug; 71(848):852-60. PubMed ID: 9828798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Achieving dose reduction in lumbar spine radiography.
Heriard JB; Terry JA; Arnold AL
Radiol Technol; 1993; 65(2):97-103; quiz 104-6. PubMed ID: 8284371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. DETERMINATION OF DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVEL IN ROUTINE EXAMINATIONS OF DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY IN MAZANDARAN PROVINCE.
Hoseini Motlagh Z; Shabestani Monfared A; Deevband MR; Abedi-Firouzjah R; Ghaemian N; Abdi R; Ebrahimnejad Gorji K
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Aug; 190(1):31-37. PubMed ID: 32491180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A pilot study investigating two dose reduction techniques for AP lumbar spine radiography using direct dosimetry and Projection VR.
Shanahan MC
Radiography (Lond); 2017 Aug; 23(3):222-228. PubMed ID: 28687290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
