102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7788237)
1. Analysis of patient doses for myelogram and discogram examinations and their reduction through changes in equipment set-up.
Martin CJ; Hunter S
Br J Radiol; 1995 May; 68(809):508-14. PubMed ID: 7788237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reduction of patient doses from barium meal and barium enema examinations through changes in equipment factors.
Martin CJ; Hunter S
Br J Radiol; 1994 Dec; 67(804):1196-205. PubMed ID: 7874418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient doses from barium meal and barium enema examinations and potential for reduction through proper set-up of equipment.
Yakoumakis E; Tsalafoutas IA; Sandilos P; Koulentianos H; Kasfiki A; Vlahos L; Proukakis C
Br J Radiol; 1999 Feb; 72(854):173-8. PubMed ID: 10365069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Collective effective dose from diagnostic radiology in Ukraine.
Stadnyk L; Shalopa O; Nosyk O
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):146-9. PubMed ID: 25848100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Organ and effective doses in infants undergoing upper gastrointestinal (UGI) fluoroscopic examination.
Staton RJ; Williams JL; Arreola MM; Hintenlang DE; Bolch WE
Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):703-10. PubMed ID: 17388188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of patient dose for examinations of the upper gastrointestinal tract at 11 conventional and digital X-ray units in The Netherlands.
Geleijns J; Broerse JJ; Chandie Shaw MP; Schultz FW; Teeuwisse W; Van Unnik JG; Zoetelief J
Br J Radiol; 1998 Jul; 71(847):745-53. PubMed ID: 9771385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of radiation doses to patients undergoing standard radiographic examinations with conventional screen-film radiography, computed radiography and direct digital radiography.
Compagnone G; Baleni MC; Pagan L; Calzolaio FL; Barozzi L; Bergamini C
Br J Radiol; 2006 Nov; 79(947):899-904. PubMed ID: 17065288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital radiography in paediatrics: radiation dose considerations and magnitude of possible dose reduction.
Hufton AP; Doyle SM; Carty HM
Br J Radiol; 1998 Feb; 71(842):186-99. PubMed ID: 9579183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Design of a database with graphical analysis for X-ray quality assurance and dose information to assist in a programme for patient dose reduction.
Lam C; Martin CJ
Br J Radiol; 1991 Sep; 64(765):831-5. PubMed ID: 1913047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Paediatric dose reduction with the introduction of digital fluorography.
Mooney RB; McKinstry J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):117-20. PubMed ID: 11487817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. AEC set-up optimisation with computed radiography imaging.
Mazzocchi S; Belli G; Busoni S; Gori C; Menchi I; Salucci P; Taddeucci A; Zatelli G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):169-73. PubMed ID: 16461503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lumbar discography. Its value in diagnosis and treatment of lumbar disc lesions.
Brodsky AE; Binder WF
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1979; 4(2):110-20. PubMed ID: 162547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dose performance evaluation of a charge coupled device and a flat-panel digital fluoroscopy system recently installed in an interventional cardiology laboratory.
Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Kollaros N; Dafnomili P; Kyriakidis Z; Neofotistou V
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 15266080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Data analysis from a multi-centre, comparative study of angiographic examinations leading to practical guidelines for the optimisation of patient doses.
Struelens L; Vanhavere F; Bosmans H; Van Loon R; Geukens M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):87-92. PubMed ID: 16461507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of the problem: pediatric doses in screen-film and digital radiography.
Huda W
Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct; 34 Suppl 3():S173-82; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of AEC chamber selection on patient dose and image quality.
Hawking N; Elmore A
Radiol Technol; 2009; 80(5):411-9. PubMed ID: 19457845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Methods for monitoring patient dose in dental radiology.
Helmrot E; Thilander-Klang A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):303-5. PubMed ID: 20223852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Reduction of the radiation exposure of patients caused by selected interventional and angiographic procedures].
Seifert H; el-Jamal A; Roth R; Urbanczyk K; Kramann B
Rofo; 2000 Dec; 172(12):1057-64. PubMed ID: 11199435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A review of factors affecting patient doses for barium enemas and meals.
Martin CJ
Br J Radiol; 2004 Oct; 77(922):864-8. PubMed ID: 15482999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient doses for barium meal examination in Serbia and Montenegro and potentials for dose reduction through changes in equipment settings.
Ciraj O; Markovic S; Kosutic D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):158-63. PubMed ID: 15933099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
