These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7788237)

  • 1. Analysis of patient doses for myelogram and discogram examinations and their reduction through changes in equipment set-up.
    Martin CJ; Hunter S
    Br J Radiol; 1995 May; 68(809):508-14. PubMed ID: 7788237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reduction of patient doses from barium meal and barium enema examinations through changes in equipment factors.
    Martin CJ; Hunter S
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Dec; 67(804):1196-205. PubMed ID: 7874418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patient doses from barium meal and barium enema examinations and potential for reduction through proper set-up of equipment.
    Yakoumakis E; Tsalafoutas IA; Sandilos P; Koulentianos H; Kasfiki A; Vlahos L; Proukakis C
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Feb; 72(854):173-8. PubMed ID: 10365069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Collective effective dose from diagnostic radiology in Ukraine.
    Stadnyk L; Shalopa O; Nosyk O
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):146-9. PubMed ID: 25848100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Organ and effective doses in infants undergoing upper gastrointestinal (UGI) fluoroscopic examination.
    Staton RJ; Williams JL; Arreola MM; Hintenlang DE; Bolch WE
    Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):703-10. PubMed ID: 17388188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of patient dose for examinations of the upper gastrointestinal tract at 11 conventional and digital X-ray units in The Netherlands.
    Geleijns J; Broerse JJ; Chandie Shaw MP; Schultz FW; Teeuwisse W; Van Unnik JG; Zoetelief J
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Jul; 71(847):745-53. PubMed ID: 9771385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of radiation doses to patients undergoing standard radiographic examinations with conventional screen-film radiography, computed radiography and direct digital radiography.
    Compagnone G; Baleni MC; Pagan L; Calzolaio FL; Barozzi L; Bergamini C
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Nov; 79(947):899-904. PubMed ID: 17065288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital radiography in paediatrics: radiation dose considerations and magnitude of possible dose reduction.
    Hufton AP; Doyle SM; Carty HM
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Feb; 71(842):186-99. PubMed ID: 9579183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Design of a database with graphical analysis for X-ray quality assurance and dose information to assist in a programme for patient dose reduction.
    Lam C; Martin CJ
    Br J Radiol; 1991 Sep; 64(765):831-5. PubMed ID: 1913047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Paediatric dose reduction with the introduction of digital fluorography.
    Mooney RB; McKinstry J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):117-20. PubMed ID: 11487817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. AEC set-up optimisation with computed radiography imaging.
    Mazzocchi S; Belli G; Busoni S; Gori C; Menchi I; Salucci P; Taddeucci A; Zatelli G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):169-73. PubMed ID: 16461503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lumbar discography. Its value in diagnosis and treatment of lumbar disc lesions.
    Brodsky AE; Binder WF
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1979; 4(2):110-20. PubMed ID: 162547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dose performance evaluation of a charge coupled device and a flat-panel digital fluoroscopy system recently installed in an interventional cardiology laboratory.
    Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Kollaros N; Dafnomili P; Kyriakidis Z; Neofotistou V
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 15266080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Data analysis from a multi-centre, comparative study of angiographic examinations leading to practical guidelines for the optimisation of patient doses.
    Struelens L; Vanhavere F; Bosmans H; Van Loon R; Geukens M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):87-92. PubMed ID: 16461507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of the problem: pediatric doses in screen-film and digital radiography.
    Huda W
    Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct; 34 Suppl 3():S173-82; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of AEC chamber selection on patient dose and image quality.
    Hawking N; Elmore A
    Radiol Technol; 2009; 80(5):411-9. PubMed ID: 19457845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methods for monitoring patient dose in dental radiology.
    Helmrot E; Thilander-Klang A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):303-5. PubMed ID: 20223852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Reduction of the radiation exposure of patients caused by selected interventional and angiographic procedures].
    Seifert H; el-Jamal A; Roth R; Urbanczyk K; Kramann B
    Rofo; 2000 Dec; 172(12):1057-64. PubMed ID: 11199435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A review of factors affecting patient doses for barium enemas and meals.
    Martin CJ
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Oct; 77(922):864-8. PubMed ID: 15482999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patient doses for barium meal examination in Serbia and Montenegro and potentials for dose reduction through changes in equipment settings.
    Ciraj O; Markovic S; Kosutic D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):158-63. PubMed ID: 15933099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.