BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7788237)

  • 21. Calibrating automatic exposure control devices for digital radiography.
    Doyle P; Martin CJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5475-85. PubMed ID: 17047264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Quality assurance of computed and digital radiography systems.
    Walsh C; Gorman D; Byrne P; Larkin A; Dowling A; Malone JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18319281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Variations of patient doses in interventional examinations at different angiographic units.
    Bor D; Toklu T; Olğar T; Sancak T; Cekirge S; Onal B; Bilgiç S
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2006; 29(5):797-806. PubMed ID: 16718424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Technical advances of interventional fluoroscopy and flat panel image receptor.
    Lin PJ
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 18849699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effective doses for coronary angiography.
    Leung KC; Martin CJ
    Br J Radiol; 1996 May; 69(821):426-31. PubMed ID: 8705181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Digital image intensifier radiography--one year's experience with a Polytron system].
    Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
    Rofo; 1989 Sep; 151(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 2552516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Automatic exposure control in pediatric and adult computed tomography examinations: can we estimate organ and effective dose from mean MAS reduction?
    Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Oikonomou I; Damilakis J
    Invest Radiol; 2011 Oct; 46(10):654-62. PubMed ID: 21673583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Patient absorbed doses in digital grey-scale fluorography.
    Cowen AR; Taylor C
    Br J Radiol; 1986 Jul; 59(703):689-93. PubMed ID: 3730767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An investigation into the radiation dose associated with different imaging systems for chest radiology.
    Marshall NW; Faulkner K; Busch HP; Marsh DM; Pfenning H
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Apr; 67(796):353-9. PubMed ID: 8173876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents. Typical patient radiation doses in diagnostic radiology.
    Parry RA; Glaze SA; Archer BR
    Radiographics; 1999; 19(5):1289-302. PubMed ID: 10489180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) on patient radiation doses for examination of the lateral lumbar spine.
    Weatherburn GC; Bryan S
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Jun; 72(858):534-45. PubMed ID: 10560334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Exposure variations under error conditions in automatic exposure controlled film-screen projection radiography.
    Walsh C; Larkin A; Dennan S; O'Reilly G
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Nov; 77(923):931-3. PubMed ID: 15507417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Technical note: potentially higher patient radiation doses using digital equipment for barium studies.
    Hart D; Wall BF
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Oct; 68(814):1112-5. PubMed ID: 7496715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Digital fluorography in gastroenterological radiology].
    Bellomi M; Severini A; Cozzi G; Zonca G; Brusa A; Colnago L; Salvetti M; Colnago MF
    Radiol Med; 1994 Apr; 87(4):460-8. PubMed ID: 8190930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An investigation into patient and staff doses from X-ray angiography during coronary interventional procedures.
    Morrish OW; Goldstone KE
    Br J Radiol; 2008 Jan; 81(961):35-45. PubMed ID: 18039722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A survey of fluoroscopic equipment in Victoria.
    Boal TJ; Dessent KW; Facci M
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1998 Dec; 21(4):161-9. PubMed ID: 10050346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Initial experiences with pulsed fluoroscopy on a multifunctional fluoroscopic unit].
    Herrmann K; Helmberger T; Waggershauser T; Schätzl M; Allmendinger H; Reiser M
    Rofo; 1996 Nov; 165(5):475-9. PubMed ID: 8998321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Comparison of radiation exposure of patients caused by selected interventional and angiography procedures--initial results].
    Seifert H; Roth R; Urbanczyk K; Kramann B
    Rofo; 1999 Feb; 170(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 10101360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Diagnostic and interventional radiology: a strategy to introduce reference dose level taking into account the national practice.
    Verdun FR; Aroua A; Trueb PR; Vock P; Valley JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):188-91. PubMed ID: 15933106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.