153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7788241)
21. [Pelvimetry].
Lode OI; Sundalsfoll S; Austad T
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1991 Aug; 111(18):2261-4. PubMed ID: 1896980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Fetal dose estimates for CT pelvimetry.
Moore MM; Shearer DR
Radiology; 1989 Apr; 171(1):265-7. PubMed ID: 2928535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Computed tomography pelvimetry: accuracy and radiation dose compared with conventional pelvimetry.
Morris CW; Heggie JC; Acton CM
Australas Radiol; 1993 May; 37(2):186-91. PubMed ID: 8512510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Low radiation exposure pelvimetry by digital radiography.
Anderson JC; Chu WK; Dobry CA
Nebr Med J; 1983 Nov; 68(11):363-5. PubMed ID: 6656948
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. A comparative study of X-ray pelvimetry and CT pelvimetry.
Raman S; Samuel D; Suresh K
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1991 Aug; 31(3):217-20. PubMed ID: 1804081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [CT pelvimetry: a new approach using multi detector CT and volume rendering].
Balleyguier C; Jouanic JM; Corréas JM; Benachi A; Dumez Y; Menu Y
J Radiol; 2003 Apr; 84(4 Pt 1):425-7. PubMed ID: 12759661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Radiation exposure of patients examined by a digital x-ray unit].
Volobuev AI; Denisov PI; Kokhanskiĭ IN; Khabakhpashev AG; Shekhtman LI
Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1989; (1):59-62. PubMed ID: 2718363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of radiation doses to patients undergoing standard radiographic examinations with conventional screen-film radiography, computed radiography and direct digital radiography.
Compagnone G; Baleni MC; Pagan L; Calzolaio FL; Barozzi L; Bergamini C
Br J Radiol; 2006 Nov; 79(947):899-904. PubMed ID: 17065288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Perceptibility of details in conventional and digital teleradiography--a comparative study].
Ruppenthal T; Doll G; Sergl HG; Fricke B
Orthod Fr; 1991; 62 Pt 3():1033-42. PubMed ID: 1842243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Digital image intensifier radiography--what dose for what clinical problem?].
Lehmann KJ; Busch HP; Georgi M
Aktuelle Radiol; 1992 Jan; 2(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 1547288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Digital chest x-rays with a selenium detector: a prospective comparison with a conventional film-screen combination].
Freund M; Reuter M; Palmié S; Harder E; Hutzelmann A; Heller M
Rofo; 1997 Feb; 166(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 9116250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Radiation dosage in computed tomographic and X-ray pelvimetry.
Gafoor FA; Moodley J; Rana MD; Bassa A; Chamberlain AC
S Afr Med J; 1994 Jun; 84(6):368-9. PubMed ID: 7740403
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Helical CT pelvimetry: advantages of a low dose volume acquisition technique].
Breidt D; Bouquigny F; Clément JP; Menéchal P; Levert M; Quéreux C; Piérot L
J Radiol; 2003 Sep; 84(9):1027-30. PubMed ID: 13679759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Can three-dimensional pelvimetry using low-dose stereoradiography replace low-dose CT pelvimetry?
Aubry S; Padoin P; Petegnief Y; Vidal C; Riethmuller D; Delabrousse E
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2018 Sep; 99(9):569-576. PubMed ID: 29567122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. An investigation into the radiation dose associated with different imaging systems for chest radiology.
Marshall NW; Faulkner K; Busch HP; Marsh DM; Pfenning H
Br J Radiol; 1994 Apr; 67(796):353-9. PubMed ID: 8173876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Pelvimetry using x-ray computed tomography].
Camus M; Buthiau D; Vauthier D; Heitz F; Darbois Y
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1987; 16(3):327-33. PubMed ID: 3598097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Digital image intensifier radiography--one year's experience with a Polytron system].
Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
Rofo; 1989 Sep; 151(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 2552516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Comparison of classic and digital pelvimetry for measuring the medial transverse diameter in 50 female patients].
Montoy JC; Ravaux S; Blache G
J Radiol; 1990 Nov; 71(11):633-8. PubMed ID: 2283626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparative dose levels between CT-scanner and slot-scanning device (EOS system) in pregnant women pelvimetry.
Ben Abdennebi A; Aubry S; Ounalli L; Fayache MS; Delabrousse E; Petegnief Y
Phys Med; 2017 Jan; 33():77-86. PubMed ID: 27993442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [New aspects of radiologic pelvimetry. Digital image intensification radiography: preliminary results of validation possibilities and results in various types of pelvic disproportion].
Wischnik A; Lehmann KJ; Busch HP; Englmeier KH; Sterescu D; Georgi M; Melchert F
Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1989; 193(3):145-51. PubMed ID: 2763609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
