These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7788241)

  • 41. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic].
    Fiedler E; Aichinger U; Böhner C; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
    Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Artifacts seen during CT pelvimetry: implications for digital systems with scanning beams.
    Brody AS; Saks BJ; Field DR; Skinner SR; Capra RE
    Radiology; 1986 Jul; 160(1):269-71. PubMed ID: 3715043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [A technic of magnetic resonance tomographic pelvimetry in obstetrics].
    Sigmund G; Bauer M; Henne K; DeGregorio G; Wenz W
    Rofo; 1991 Apr; 154(4):370-4. PubMed ID: 1850151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Low-dose digital computed radiography in pediatric chest imaging.
    Kogutt MS; Jones JP; Perkins DD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Oct; 151(4):775-9. PubMed ID: 3262278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. AMBER and conventional chest radiography: comparison of radiation dose and image quality.
    Geleijns J; Broerse JJ; Julius HW; Vrooman HA; Zoetelief J; Zweers D; Kool LJ
    Radiology; 1992 Dec; 185(3):719-23. PubMed ID: 1438752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Clinical experience with an advanced laser digitizer for cost-effective digital radiography.
    MacMahon H; Xu XW; Hoffmann KR; Giger ML; Yoshimura H; Doi K; Carlin M; Kano A; Yao L; Abe K
    Radiographics; 1993 May; 13(3):635-45; discussion 645-6. PubMed ID: 8316670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Assessment of the problem: pediatric doses in screen-film and digital radiography.
    Huda W
    Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct; 34 Suppl 3():S173-82; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Optimization of chest radiographic imaging parameters: a comparison of image quality and entrance skin dose for digital chest radiography systems.
    Sun Z; Lin C; Tyan Y; Ng KH
    Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 22726965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. An ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Börjesson J; Mattsson S; Schlossman D
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Nov; 9(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 2591385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Fetal radiation exposure is minimal after pelvimetry by modified digital radiography.
    Ferguson JE; DeAngelis GA; Newberry YG; Finnerty JJ; Agarwal S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Aug; 175(2):260-7; discussion 267-9. PubMed ID: 8765240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Patient dose in digital projection radiography.
    Compagnone G; Pagan L; Baleni MC; Calzolaio FL; Barozzi L; Bergamini C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):135-7. PubMed ID: 18252850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Pelvimetry by digital radiography.
    Adam P; Alberge Y; Castellano S; Kassab M; Escude B
    Clin Radiol; 1985 May; 36(3):327-30. PubMed ID: 4064519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Radiographic pelvimetry--its use and possible radiation risk.
    Lundh C; Lindmark G; Wilbrand H; Ytterbergh C
    Ups J Med Sci; 1984; 89(2):135-46. PubMed ID: 6464243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Image quality evaluation and dosage requirements of digital image intensifier radiography].
    Braunschweig R; Bauer J; Seeger W
    Rofo; 1993 Sep; 159(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 8374118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Contrast resolution of line-scanned digital radiography.
    Sommer FG; Brody WR
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1982 Apr; 6(2):373-7. PubMed ID: 7076928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Experience with computed tomography (CT) pelvimetry in Ibadan, Nigeria: a preliminary report.
    Obajimi MO; Omigbodun AO; Ogunseyinde AO; Adekunle AO
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2001 Sep; 30(3):237-9. PubMed ID: 14510137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [A comparative study of the possibility of reducing the dosage in lateral teleradiographs].
    Ruppenthal T; Fricke B; Sergl HG; Doll G
    Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1992 Feb; 53(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 1551627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
    MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
    Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Strategies for dose reduction in ordinary radiographic examinations using CR and DR.
    Willis CE
    Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct; 34 Suppl 3():S196-200; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Radiologic low-dose pelvimetry. Indications and pelvimetry data.
    Ohlsén H
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1980; 21(6):747-58. PubMed ID: 7234487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.