These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7788241)
61. CT pelvimetry: the foveae are not an accurate landmark for the level of the ischial spines. Aronson D; Kier R AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Mar; 156(3):527-30. PubMed ID: 1899750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. [Indications of radio-pelvimetry at a university hospital and a district general hospital]. Berthet J; Racinet C; Eymery JP; Halabi M J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1988; 17(5):624-8. PubMed ID: 3230270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents. Typical patient radiation doses in diagnostic radiology. Parry RA; Glaze SA; Archer BR Radiographics; 1999; 19(5):1289-302. PubMed ID: 10489180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Improving the accuracy of digital CT pelvimetry. Smith RC; McCarthy S J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1991; 15(5):787-9. PubMed ID: 1885796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. An evaluation of the EOS X-ray imaging system in pelvimetry. Sigmann MH; Delabrousse E; Riethmuller D; Runge M; Peyron C; Aubry S Diagn Interv Imaging; 2014 Sep; 95(9):833-8. PubMed ID: 24906809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Pelvimetry with image intensifier camera. A low radiation dose method. Lauteala I Acta Radiol Suppl; 1974; 341():1-132. PubMed ID: 4526364 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
71. Three-dimensional pelvimetry by computed tomography. Lenhard M; Johnson T; Weckbach S; Nikolaou K; Friese K; Hasbargen U Radiol Med; 2009 Aug; 114(5):827-34. PubMed ID: 19551346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. [Pelvimetry (author's transl)]. Guinard J; Labrune M; Benardeau T; Papiernik-Berkhauer E J Radiol Electrol Med Nucl; 1975 Oct; 56(10):721-5. PubMed ID: 1195216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Slot-scan digital radiography of the lower extremities: a comparison to computed radiography with respect to image quality and radiation dose. Lee KH; Kwon JW; Yoon YC; Choi SH; Jung JY; Kim JH; Lee SJ Korean J Radiol; 2009; 10(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 19182503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Measurement of leg length inequalities by Micro-Dose digital radiographs. Altongy JF; Harcke HT; Bowen JR J Pediatr Orthop; 1987; 7(3):311-6. PubMed ID: 3584448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Comparison of pelvimetry techniques. Edwards PD; Brown V; Wade P Clin Radiol; 1997 Sep; 52(9):725. PubMed ID: 9313745 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
77. Routine lateral pelvimetry: a personal experience. al-Meshari AA Rays; 1988; 13(3):43-8. PubMed ID: 3256016 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. Improving pediatric radiation dose management using Agfa digital radiography DICOM header information. Juste B; Villaescusa N; Granero D; VerdĂș G Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():4457-9. PubMed ID: 18002994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. A computerized aid to Ball pelvimetry. Klapholz H Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1975 Apr; 121(8):1067-70. PubMed ID: 1119498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]