154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7789060)
1. Long-term performance in vitro and in vivo of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Reginster JY; Deroisy R; Zegels B; Jupsin I; Albert A; Franchimont P
Clin Rheumatol; 1995 Mar; 14(2):180-6. PubMed ID: 7789060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: clinical evaluation of a new cone-beam system.
Blake GM; Knapp KM; Fogelman I
Calcif Tissue Int; 2005 Feb; 76(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 15645160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of bone mineral density of lumbar spine, hip, femoral neck and Ward's triangle by forearm bone mineral density.
Trivitayaratana W; Trivitayaratana P; Kongkiatikul S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Mar; 84(3):390-6. PubMed ID: 11460941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The accuracy of bone mineral density at distal radius on non-forearm osteoporosis identification.
Trivitayaratana W; Trivitayaratana P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Apr; 84(4):566-71. PubMed ID: 11460970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: cross-calibration of a new fan-beam system.
Blake GM; Harrison EJ; Adams JE
Calcif Tissue Int; 2004 Jul; 75(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 15037973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: a comparison between fan beam and pencil beam scans.
Blake GM; Parker JC; Buxton FM; Fogelman I
Br J Radiol; 1993 Oct; 66(790):902-6. PubMed ID: 8220974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of two Hologic DXA systems (QDR 1000 and QDR 4500/A).
Barthe N; Braillon P; Ducassou D; Basse-Cathalinat B
Br J Radiol; 1997 Jul; 70(835):728-39. PubMed ID: 9245885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of phantoms for cross-calibration of lumbar spine DXA.
Pearson D; Cawte SA; Green DJ
Osteoporos Int; 2002 Dec; 13(12):948-54. PubMed ID: 12459937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy and precision of in vivo bone mineral measurements in sheep using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Pouilles JM; Collard P; Tremollieres F; Frayssinet P; Railhac JJ; Cahuzac JP; Autefage A; Ribot C
Calcif Tissue Int; 2000 Jan; 66(1):70-3. PubMed ID: 10602849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bone mineral density of opposing hips using dual energy X-Ray absorptiometry in single-beam and fan-beam design.
Franck H; Munz M; Scherrer M
Calcif Tissue Int; 1997 Dec; 61(6):445-7. PubMed ID: 9383269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term change in the bone mineral density of adults with adult onset growth hormone (GH) deficiency in response to short or long-term GH replacement therapy.
Rahim A; Holmes SJ; Adams JE; Shalet SM
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf); 1998 Apr; 48(4):463-9. PubMed ID: 9640413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differences between dual X-ray absorptiometry using pencil beam and fan beam modes and their determinants in vivo and in vitro.
Ruetsche AG; Lippuner K; Jaeger P; Casez JP
J Clin Densitom; 2000; 3(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 10871910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variations in diagnostic performances of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the northwest of The Netherlands.
Staal KP; Roos JC; Manoliu RA; Kostense PJ; Lips P;
Osteoporos Int; 2004 Apr; 15(4):335-44. PubMed ID: 14628109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation and application of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to measure bone mineral density in rabbit vertebrae.
Norris SA; Pettifor JM; Gray DA; Biscardi A; Buffenstein R
J Clin Densitom; 2000; 3(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 10917741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intersite comparison of the Hologic QDR-1000 dual energy X-ray bone densitometer.
Blake GM; Tong CM; Fogelman I
Br J Radiol; 1991 May; 64(761):440-6. PubMed ID: 2036569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry measurement of bone mineral content in newborns: validation of the technique.
Braillon PM; Salle BL; Brunet J; Glorieux FH; Delmas PD; Meunier PJ
Pediatr Res; 1992 Jul; 32(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 1635849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of peripheral dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: comparison with single photon absorptiometry of the forearm and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the spine or femur.
Mole PA; McMurdo ME; Paterson CR
Br J Radiol; 1998 Apr; 71(844):427-32. PubMed ID: 9659136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone mineral measurement--comparison of a single-beam and fan-beam design: the effect of osteophytic calcification on spine bone mineral density.
Franck H; Munz M; Scherrer M
Calcif Tissue Int; 1995 Mar; 56(3):192-5. PubMed ID: 7750022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of body composition and bone mineral measurements from two DXA instruments in young men.
Modlesky CM; Lewis RD; Yetman KA; Rose B; Rosskopf LB; Snow TK; Sparling PB
Am J Clin Nutr; 1996 Nov; 64(5):669-76. PubMed ID: 8901784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of two Hologic DXA systems (QDR 1000 and QDR 4500/A) for in vivo bone mass measurement in the baboon (Papio ursinus).
Mas ID; Biscardi A; Ripamonti U
J Clin Densitom; 2002; 5(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 12357069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
