These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7789228)

  • 1. [Mandibular drift-orthodontics after first premolar extraction].
    Jia Q; Gao X; Fu M
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1995 Jan; 30(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 7789228
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Mechanics of the mesial movement of teeth in the posterior mandibular segment for treating class II by extraction of l4-24 and 35-45 in Tweed's technic].
    Horn AJ
    Orthod Fr; 1984; 55(2):495-501. PubMed ID: 6599560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cephalometric assessment of dentofacial vertical changes in Class I subjects treated with and without extraction.
    Sivakumar A; Valiathan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):869-75. PubMed ID: 18538251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. First or second premolar extraction effects on facial vertical dimension.
    Kim TK; Kim JT; Mah J; Yang WS; Baek SH
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Mar; 75(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 15825779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Asymmetric extraction treatment of an Angle Class II Division 2 subdivision left malocclusion with anterior and posterior crossbites.
    Shelley A; Beam W; Mergen J; Parks CT; Casko J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Oct; 118(4):462-6. PubMed ID: 11029744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Re: The effects of first premolar extractions on third molar angulations.
    Upadhyay M
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Nov; 76(6):iii; author reply iii. PubMed ID: 17120354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Premolar and additional first molar extraction effects on soft tissue. Effects on high Angle Class II division 1 patients.
    Ozaki T; Ozaki S; Kuroda K
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Mar; 77(2):244-53. PubMed ID: 17319758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of changes in the vertical facial dimension with different anchorage systems in extraction and non-extraction subjects treated by Begg fixed appliances: a retrospective study.
    Alkumru P; Erdem D; Altug-Atac AT
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):508-16. PubMed ID: 17974541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of orthodontic treatment with early extraction of four second molars.
    Jäger A; el-Kabarity A; Singelmann C
    J Orofac Orthop; 1997 Feb; 58(1):30-43. PubMed ID: 9300837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cephalometric comparison of maxillary second molar extraction and nonextraction treatments in patients with Class II malocclusions.
    Waters D; Harris EF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Dec; 120(6):608-13; quiz 677. PubMed ID: 11742305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cephalometric evaluation of symmetric and asymmetric extraction treatment for patients with Class II subdivision malocclusions.
    Janson G; Carvalho PE; Cançado RH; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 17628247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The vertical dimension: the "low-angle" patient.
    Vaden JL
    World J Orthod; 2005; 6(2):115-24. PubMed ID: 15952548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Third molar angulation during and after treatment of adolescent orthodontic patients.
    Artun J; Thalib L; Little RM
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):590-6. PubMed ID: 16009666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of mandibular third-molar impaction in adolescent orthodontic patients.
    Behbehani F; Artun J; Thalib L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jul; 130(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 16849071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prevalence of extraction space reopening in different orthodontic treatment protocols.
    Janson G; Valarelli DP; Rizzo M; Valarelli FP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Sep; 152(3):320-326. PubMed ID: 28863912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A review of second molar extractions in orthodontics.
    Anderson RH
    J Gen Orthod; 1992 Dec; 3(4):26-7. PubMed ID: 1308150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A relatively minor adult case becomes significantly complex: A lesson in humility.
    Derakhshan M; Sadowsky C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):546-53. PubMed ID: 11343028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term stability of Class II malocclusion treated with 2- and 4-premolar extraction protocols.
    Janson G; Leon-Salazar V; Leon-Salazar R; Janson M; de Freitas MR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):154.e1-10; discussion 154-5. PubMed ID: 19651339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of cephalometric characteristics on the occlusal success rate of Class II malocclusions treated with 2- and 4-premolar extraction protocols.
    Janson G; Janson M; Nakamura A; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):861-8. PubMed ID: 18538250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Extraction of maxillary first permanent molars in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Stalpers MJ; Booij JW; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Katsaros C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 17826599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.