246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7790517)
1. The accuracy of children's reports with anatomically correct dolls.
Katz SM; Schonfeld DJ; Carter AS; Leventhal JM; Cicchetti DV
J Dev Behav Pediatr; 1995 Apr; 16(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 7790517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Children's use of anatomically detailed dolls to recount an event.
Goodman GS; Aman C
Child Dev; 1990 Dec; 61(6):1859-71. PubMed ID: 2083502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interviewing young children about body touch and handling.
Steward MS; Steward DS
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 1996; 61(4-5):1-214. PubMed ID: 8972588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Developmental differences in the function and use of anatomical dolls during interviews with alleged sexual abuse victims.
Thierry KL; Lamb ME; Orbach Y; Pipe ME
J Consult Clin Psychol; 2005 Dec; 73(6):1125-34. PubMed ID: 16392985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of dolls to interview young children: issues of symbolic representation.
DeLoache JS; Marzolf DP
J Exp Child Psychol; 1995 Aug; 60(1):155-73. PubMed ID: 7545206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anatomically correct dolls used in interviews of young children suspected of having been sexually abused.
Leventhal JM; Hamilton J; Rekedal S; Tebano-Micci A; Eyster C
Pediatrics; 1989 Nov; 84(5):900-6. PubMed ID: 2797984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing the effectiveness of the NICHD investigative interview protocol when interviewing French-speaking alleged victims of child sexual abuse in Quebec.
Cyr M; Lamb ME
Child Abuse Negl; 2009 May; 33(5):257-68. PubMed ID: 19481261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. When initial interviews are delayed a year: effect on children's 2-year recall.
Peterson C; Pardy L; Tizzard-Drover T; Warren KL
Law Hum Behav; 2005 Oct; 29(5):527-41. PubMed ID: 16254741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Children's eyewitness memory: a comparison of two interviewing strategies as realized by forensic professionals.
Melinder A; Alexander K; Cho YI; Goodman GS; Thoresen C; Lonnum K; Magnussen S
J Exp Child Psychol; 2010 Mar; 105(3):156-77. PubMed ID: 19969304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anatomically-neutral dolls: their effects on the memory and suggestibility of 4- to 6-year-old eyewitnesses.
Samra J; Yuille JC
Child Abuse Negl; 1996 Dec; 20(12):1261-72. PubMed ID: 8985617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Specificity and sensitivity of sexually anatomically correct dolls in substantiating abuse: a pilot study.
Realmuto GM; Jensen JB; Wescoe S
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 1990 Sep; 29(5):743-6. PubMed ID: 2228927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of drawing on children's accounts of sexual abuse.
Katz C; Hershkowitz I
Child Maltreat; 2010 May; 15(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 19926626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of nonanatomical dolls in the sexual abuse interview.
Britton HL; O'Keefe MA
Child Abuse Negl; 1991; 15(4):567-73. PubMed ID: 1959088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dynamics of forensic interviews with suspected abuse victims who do not disclose abuse.
Hershkowitz I; Orbach Y; Lamb ME; Sternberg KJ; Horowitz D
Child Abuse Negl; 2006 Jul; 30(7):753-69. PubMed ID: 16846642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exploratory assessments of child abuse: children's responses to interviewer's questions across multiple interview sessions.
Patterson T; Pipe ME
Child Abuse Negl; 2009 Aug; 33(8):490-504. PubMed ID: 19766310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigative interviews of alleged sexual abuse victims with and without anatomical dolls.
Lamb ME; Hershkowitz I; Sternberg KJ; Boat B; Everson MD
Child Abuse Negl; 1996 Dec; 20(12):1251-9. PubMed ID: 8985616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of intra- versus post-interview feedback during simulated practice interviews about child abuse.
Powell MB; Fisher RP; Hughes-Scholes CH
Child Abuse Negl; 2008 Feb; 32(2):213-27. PubMed ID: 18313750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Socioemotional factors in child sexual abuse investigations.
Hershkowitz I
Child Maltreat; 2009 May; 14(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 19047478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An examination of the association between interviewer question type and story-grammar detail in child witness interviews about abuse.
Feltis BB; Powell MB; Snow PC; Hughes-Scholes CH
Child Abuse Negl; 2010 Jun; 34(6):407-13. PubMed ID: 20417968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of anatomical dolls as a demonstration aid in child sexual abuse interviews: a study of forensic interviewers' perceptions.
Hlavka HR; Olinger SD; Lashley JL
J Child Sex Abus; 2010 Sep; 19(5):519-53. PubMed ID: 20924909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
