These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7790517)

  • 21. Young children's references to temporal attributes of allegedly experienced events in the course of forensic interviews.
    Orbach Y; Lamb ME
    Child Dev; 2007; 78(4):1100-20. PubMed ID: 17650128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assumptions and beliefs about the role of AD dolls in child sexual abuse validation interviews: are they supported empirically?
    Skinner LJ
    Behav Sci Law; 1996; 14(2):167-85. PubMed ID: 10160234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Which sexual abuse victims receive a forensic medical examination? The impact of Children's Advocacy Centers.
    Walsh WA; Cross TP; Jones LM; Simone M; Kolko DJ
    Child Abuse Negl; 2007 Oct; 31(10):1053-68. PubMed ID: 17996300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Children exposed to obscene phone calls: what they remember and tell.
    Leander L; Granhag PA; Christianson SA
    Child Abuse Negl; 2005 Aug; 29(8):871-88. PubMed ID: 16125231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [The influence of cognitive abilities, age and characteristics of their sexual abuse experience on the statement of the presumed victims].
    Dion J; Cyr M; Richard N; McDuff P
    Child Abuse Negl; 2006 Aug; 30(8):945-60. PubMed ID: 16930700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Props and children's event reports: the impact of a 1-year delay.
    Salmon K; Pipe ME
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1997 Jun; 65(3):261-92. PubMed ID: 9178961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Using a human figure drawing to elicit information from alleged victims of child sexual abuse.
    Aldridge J; Lamb ME; Sternberg KJ; Orbach Y; Esplin PW; Bowler L
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2004 Apr; 72(2):304-16. PubMed ID: 15065963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Age differences in young children's responses to open-ended invitations in the course of forensic interviews.
    Lamb ME; Sternberg KJ; Orbach Y; Esplin PW; Stewart H; Mitchell S
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2003 Oct; 71(5):926-34. PubMed ID: 14516241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The development of communicative and narrative skills among preschoolers: lessons from forensic interviews about child abuse.
    Hershkowitz I; Lamb ME; Orbach Y; Katz C; Horowitz D
    Child Dev; 2012; 83(2):611-22. PubMed ID: 22181976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The use of the NICHD protocol to enhance the quantity of details obtained from children with low verbal abilities in investigative interviews: a pilot study.
    Dion J; Cyr M
    J Child Sex Abus; 2008; 17(2):144-62. PubMed ID: 19042243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of multipart prompts on children's testimonies in sexual abuse investigations.
    Katz C; Hershkowitz I
    Child Abuse Negl; 2012; 36(11-12):753-9. PubMed ID: 23069782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The response of young, non-sexually abused children to anatomically correct dolls.
    Glaser D; Collins C
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 1989 Jul; 30(4):547-60. PubMed ID: 2768357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A missing link in suggestibility research: what is known about the behavior of field interviewers in unstructured interviews with young children?
    Gilstrap LL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2004 Mar; 10(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 15053699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Child forensic interviewing in Children's Advocacy Centers: empirical data on a practice model.
    Cross TP; Jones LM; Walsh WA; Simone M; Kolko D
    Child Abuse Negl; 2007 Oct; 31(10):1031-52. PubMed ID: 17996298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Psychological science and the use of anatomically detailed dolls in child sexual-abuse assessments.
    Koocher GP; Goodman GS; White CS; Friedrich WN; Sivan AB; Reynolds CR
    Psychol Bull; 1995 Sep; 118(2):199-222. PubMed ID: 7568570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The strategic regulation of children's memory performance and suggestibility.
    Roebers CM; Schneider W
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2005 May; 91(1):24-44. PubMed ID: 15814094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Does the nature of the experience influence suggestibility? A study of children's event memory.
    Gobbo C; Mega C; Pipe ME
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2002 Apr; 81(4):502-30. PubMed ID: 11890734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Factors influencing child witnesses.
    Cederborg AC
    Scand J Psychol; 2004 Jul; 45(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 15182237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Children's use of anatomically detailed dolls to report genital touching in a medical examination: developmental and gender comparisons.
    Bruck M; Ceci SJ; Francoeur E
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2000 Mar; 6(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 10937313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Children's questions: a mechanism for cognitive development.
    Chouinard MM
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2007; 72(1):vii-ix, 1-112; discussion 113-26. PubMed ID: 17394580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.