These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7790659)

  • 1. The identification of vowel-like harmonic complexes: effects of component phase, level, and fundamental frequency.
    Alcántara JI; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Jun; 97(6):3813-24. PubMed ID: 7790659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of phase and level on vowel identification: data and predictions based on a nonlinear basilar-membrane model.
    Alcántara JI; Holube I; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Oct; 100(4 Pt 1):2382-92. PubMed ID: 8865645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vowel identification based on amplitude modulation.
    Moore BC; Alcántara JI
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Apr; 99(4 Pt 1):2332-43. PubMed ID: 8730079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Difference limens for phase in normal and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Oct; 86(4):1351-65. PubMed ID: 2808909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimum spectral contrast for vowel identification by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Leek MR; Dorman MF; Summerfield Q
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jan; 81(1):148-54. PubMed ID: 3819173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Brainstem auditory responses to resolved and unresolved harmonics of a synthetic vowel in quiet and noise.
    Laroche M; Dajani HR; Prévost F; Marcoux AM
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 22814487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The representation of the spectra and fundamental frequencies of steady-state single- and double-vowel sounds in the temporal discharge patterns of guinea pig cochlear-nerve fibers.
    Palmer AR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1412-26. PubMed ID: 2229676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Frequency discrimination of stylized synthetic vowels with a single formant.
    Lyzenga J; Horst JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Sep; 102(3):1755-67. PubMed ID: 9301053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptual learning of fundamental frequency discrimination: effects of fundamental frequency, harmonic number, and component phase.
    Miyazono H; Glasberg BR; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3649-57. PubMed ID: 21218897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of hearing impairment and presentation level on masking period patterns for Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes.
    Summers V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Nov; 108(5 Pt 1):2307-17. PubMed ID: 11108371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Macaque thresholds for detecting increases in intensity: effects of formant structure.
    Le Prell CG; Niemiec AJ; Moody DB
    Hear Res; 2001 Dec; 162(1-2):29-42. PubMed ID: 11707349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Formant-frequency matching between sounds with different bandwidths and on different fundamental frequencies.
    Dissard P; Darwin CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jul; 110(1):409-15. PubMed ID: 11508966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensitivity of envelope following responses to vowel polarity.
    Easwar V; Beamish L; Aiken S; Choi JM; Scollie S; Purcell D
    Hear Res; 2015 Feb; 320():38-50. PubMed ID: 25500177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perception of front vowels: the role of harmonics in the first formant region.
    Assmann PF; Nearey TM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Feb; 81(2):520-34. PubMed ID: 3558970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved Detection of Vowel Envelope Frequency Following Responses Using Hotelling's T2 Analysis.
    Vanheusden FJ; Bell SL; Chesnaye MA; Simpson DM
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):116-127. PubMed ID: 29757799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech coding in the auditory nerve: I. Vowel-like sounds.
    Delgutte B; Kiang NY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Mar; 75(3):866-78. PubMed ID: 6707316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fundamental frequency effects on thresholds for vowel formant discrimination.
    Kewley-Port D; Li X; Zheng Y; Neel AT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Oct; 100(4 Pt 1):2462-70. PubMed ID: 8865651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech coding in the auditory nerve: II. Processing schemes for vowel-like sounds.
    Delgutte B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Mar; 75(3):879-86. PubMed ID: 6707317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Absence of effect of coherent frequency modulation on grouping a mistuned harmonic with a vowel.
    Darwin CJ; Sandell GJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 May; 97(5 Pt 1):3135-8. PubMed ID: 7759653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.