152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7790660)
1. Frequency glide discrimination in the F2 region by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Summers V; Leek MR
J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Jun; 97(6):3825-32. PubMed ID: 7790660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of cochlear hearing loss on perceptual grouping cues in competing-vowel perception.
Rossi-Katz JA; Arehart KH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Oct; 118(4):2588-98. PubMed ID: 16266179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Double-vowel perception in listeners with cochlear hearing loss: differences in fundamental frequency, ear of presentation, and relative amplitude.
Arehart KH; Rossi-Katz J; Swensson-Prutsman J
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Feb; 48(1):236-52. PubMed ID: 15938067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tone-glide discrimination: normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
Collins MJ
J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Sep; 27(3):403-12. PubMed ID: 6482410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of relative and overall amplitude on perception of voiceless stop consonants by listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
Hedrick MS; Schulte L; Jesteadt W
J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Sep; 98(3):1292-303. PubMed ID: 7560503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reduced frequency selectivity and the preservation of spectral contrast in noise.
Leek MR; Summers V
J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Sep; 100(3):1796-806. PubMed ID: 8817905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of audibility on better-ear glimpsing as a function of frequency in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Rana B; Buchholz JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Apr; 143(4):2195. PubMed ID: 29716302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
Phatak SA; Grant KW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Speech perception in gated noise: the effects of temporal resolution.
Jin SH; Nelson PB
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 May; 119(5 Pt 1):3097-108. PubMed ID: 16708964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners.
Dubno JR; Schaefer AB
J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2110-21. PubMed ID: 1597602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Consonant identification in noise using Hilbert-transform temporal fine-structure speech and recovered-envelope speech for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
Léger AC; Reed CM; Desloge JG; Swaminathan J; Braida LD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):389-403. PubMed ID: 26233038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. II: Articulation index predictions.
Dubno JR; Dirks DD; Schaefer AB
J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):355-64. PubMed ID: 2921418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A psychophysical evaluation of spectral enhancement.
DiGiovanni JJ; Nelson PB; Schlauch RS
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1121-35. PubMed ID: 16411801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing.
Strelcyk O; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3328-45. PubMed ID: 19425674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perceptual weighting of stop consonant cues by normal and impaired listeners in reverberation versus noise.
Hedrick MS; Younger MS
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):254-69. PubMed ID: 17463228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Effect of Cochlear Damage on the Sensitivity to Harmonicity.
Bonnard D; Dauman R; Semal C; Demany L
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 27992390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of Simulated Hearing Loss on Bilingual Children's Consonant Recognition in Noise.
Nishi K; Trevino AC; Rosado Rogers L; García P; Neely ST
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e292-e304. PubMed ID: 28353522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Labeling of /s/ and [see text] by listeners with normal and impaired hearing, revisited.
Hedrick MS; Younger MS
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2003 Jun; 46(3):636-48. PubMed ID: 14696991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of relative amplitude, presentation level, and vowel duration on perception of voiceless stop consonants by normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
Hedrick MS; Jesteadt W
J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Nov; 100(5):3398-407. PubMed ID: 8914319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationship between masking release in fluctuating maskers and speech reception thresholds in stationary noise.
Christiansen C; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1655-66. PubMed ID: 22978894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
